在感染和非感染情况下,Omniflow® II 假体用于股骨道血管再通的疗效。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-12 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12692-9
David J Liesker, Barzi Gareb, Maarten J Speijers, Joost R VAN DER Vorst, Pieter B Salemans, Rudolf P Tutein Nolthenius, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem
{"title":"在感染和非感染情况下,Omniflow® II 假体用于股骨道血管再通的疗效。","authors":"David J Liesker, Barzi Gareb, Maarten J Speijers, Joost R VAN DER Vorst, Pieter B Salemans, Rudolf P Tutein Nolthenius, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12692-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding the outcomes of Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II prosthesis in peripheral arterial revascularization at different anatomical sites and for different indications is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II used at various positions within the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent reconstructive lower leg vascular surgery with implantation of an Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II from 2014 until 2021 at five medical centers were retrospectively included (N.=142). Patients were subdivided into the following categories: femoro-femoral crossover (N.=19), femoral interposition (N.=18), femoro-popliteal (above-the-knee [N.=25; AK] or below-the-knee [N.=47; BK]), and femoro-crural bypass grafts (N.=33). Primary outcome was primary patency and secondary outcomes included primary assisted patency, secondary patency, major amputation, vascular graft infection, and mortality. Outcomes were compared according to different subgroups and the surgical setting (infected versus non-infected).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 35.0 (17.5-54.3) months. Three years primary patency of 58% was observed for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 75% for femoral interposition graft, 44% for femoro-popliteal above-the-knee bypass, 42% for femoro-popliteal below-the-knee bypass, and 27% in the femoro-crural position (P=0.006). Freedom from major amputation at three years were 84% for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 88% for femoral interposition bypass, 90% for femoro-popliteal AK bypass, 83% for femoro-popliteal BK bypass, and 50% for femoro-crural bypass (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the use of Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II for femoro-femoral crossover-, femoral interposition-, and femoro-popliteal (AK and BK) bypass. Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II seems to be less suitable for femoro-crural bypass with a significantly lower patency compared to other positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting.\",\"authors\":\"David J Liesker, Barzi Gareb, Maarten J Speijers, Joost R VAN DER Vorst, Pieter B Salemans, Rudolf P Tutein Nolthenius, Clark J Zeebregts, Ben R Saleem\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12692-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding the outcomes of Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II prosthesis in peripheral arterial revascularization at different anatomical sites and for different indications is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II used at various positions within the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent reconstructive lower leg vascular surgery with implantation of an Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II from 2014 until 2021 at five medical centers were retrospectively included (N.=142). Patients were subdivided into the following categories: femoro-femoral crossover (N.=19), femoral interposition (N.=18), femoro-popliteal (above-the-knee [N.=25; AK] or below-the-knee [N.=47; BK]), and femoro-crural bypass grafts (N.=33). Primary outcome was primary patency and secondary outcomes included primary assisted patency, secondary patency, major amputation, vascular graft infection, and mortality. Outcomes were compared according to different subgroups and the surgical setting (infected versus non-infected).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 35.0 (17.5-54.3) months. Three years primary patency of 58% was observed for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 75% for femoral interposition graft, 44% for femoro-popliteal above-the-knee bypass, 42% for femoro-popliteal below-the-knee bypass, and 27% in the femoro-crural position (P=0.006). Freedom from major amputation at three years were 84% for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 88% for femoral interposition bypass, 90% for femoro-popliteal AK bypass, 83% for femoro-popliteal BK bypass, and 50% for femoro-crural bypass (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the use of Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II for femoro-femoral crossover-, femoral interposition-, and femoro-popliteal (AK and BK) bypass. Omniflow<sup>®</sup> II seems to be less suitable for femoro-crural bypass with a significantly lower patency compared to other positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12692-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12692-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关 Omniflow® II 假体在不同解剖部位和不同适应症的外周动脉血管再造术中的效果的证据很少。因此,本研究旨在评估 Omniflow® II 在感染和非感染情况下用于股骨道内不同位置的效果:回顾性纳入2014年至2021年期间在五家医疗中心接受小腿血管重建手术并植入Omniflow® II的患者(142人)。患者被细分为以下几类:股骨交叉(N.=19)、股骨插植(N.=18)、股骨-腘(膝上[N.=25;AK]或膝下[N.=47;BK])和股骨-硬膜旁路移植(N.=33)。主要结果为主要通畅率,次要结果包括主要辅助通畅率、次要通畅率、主要截肢率、血管移植感染率和死亡率。结果根据不同的亚组和手术环境(感染与非感染)进行比较:中位随访时间为 35.0(17.5-54.3)个月。股骨-股骨交叉旁路术的三年初次通畅率为58%,股骨穿插移植术为75%,股骨-膝上腘旁路术为44%,股骨-膝下腘旁路术为42%,股骨-胸壁位置为27%(P=0.006)。股骨-股骨交叉旁路术的三年内免大截肢率为84%,股骨间位旁路术为88%,股骨-腘动脉AK旁路术为90%,股骨-腘动脉BK旁路术为83%,股骨-硬膜外旁路术为50%:本研究证明了将 Omniflow® II 用于股-股骨交叉、股骨关节置换和股-腘(AK 和 BK)旁路的安全性和可行性。与其他位置相比,Omniflow® II 似乎不太适合股骨干旁路,其通畅率明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting.

Background: Evidence regarding the outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis in peripheral arterial revascularization at different anatomical sites and for different indications is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the Omniflow® II used at various positions within the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting.

Methods: Patients who underwent reconstructive lower leg vascular surgery with implantation of an Omniflow® II from 2014 until 2021 at five medical centers were retrospectively included (N.=142). Patients were subdivided into the following categories: femoro-femoral crossover (N.=19), femoral interposition (N.=18), femoro-popliteal (above-the-knee [N.=25; AK] or below-the-knee [N.=47; BK]), and femoro-crural bypass grafts (N.=33). Primary outcome was primary patency and secondary outcomes included primary assisted patency, secondary patency, major amputation, vascular graft infection, and mortality. Outcomes were compared according to different subgroups and the surgical setting (infected versus non-infected).

Results: The median follow-up was 35.0 (17.5-54.3) months. Three years primary patency of 58% was observed for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 75% for femoral interposition graft, 44% for femoro-popliteal above-the-knee bypass, 42% for femoro-popliteal below-the-knee bypass, and 27% in the femoro-crural position (P=0.006). Freedom from major amputation at three years were 84% for femoro-femoral crossover bypass, 88% for femoral interposition bypass, 90% for femoro-popliteal AK bypass, 83% for femoro-popliteal BK bypass, and 50% for femoro-crural bypass (P<0.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the use of Omniflow® II for femoro-femoral crossover-, femoral interposition-, and femoro-popliteal (AK and BK) bypass. Omniflow® II seems to be less suitable for femoro-crural bypass with a significantly lower patency compared to other positions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting. Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1