美国生猪生产中抗菌素的使用和耐药性监测。

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.20506/rst.42.3348
T Spronk, A L Green, M Vuolo, L Ruesch, R Edler, C Haley, J Scaria, J Hennings, S Dee, C B Shivley
{"title":"美国生猪生产中抗菌素的使用和耐药性监测。","authors":"T Spronk,&nbsp;A L Green,&nbsp;M Vuolo,&nbsp;L Ruesch,&nbsp;R Edler,&nbsp;C Haley,&nbsp;J Scaria,&nbsp;J Hennings,&nbsp;S Dee,&nbsp;C B Shivley","doi":"10.20506/rst.42.3348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on farms is recognised as an important component of antimicrobial stewardship, yet the process can be resource intensive. This paper describes a subset of findings from the first year of a collaboration across government, academia and a private sector veterinary practice focused on swine production in the Midwestern United States. The work is supported by participating farmers and the greater swine industry. Twice-annual collection of samples from pigs along with AMU monitoring occurred on 138 swine farms. Detection and resistance of Escherichia coli from pig tissues was assessed, and associations between AMU and AMR were evaluated. This paper describes the methods utilised and the first-year E. coli-related results from this project. Higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for enrofloxacin and danofloxacin in E. coli from swine tissues were associated with the purchase of fluoroquinolones. There were no other significant associations between MIC and AMU combinations in E. coli isolated from pig tissues. This project represents one of the first attempts to monitor AMU as well as AMR in E. coli in a large-scale commercial swine system in the United States of America.</p>","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance monitoring in pig production in the United States of America.\",\"authors\":\"T Spronk,&nbsp;A L Green,&nbsp;M Vuolo,&nbsp;L Ruesch,&nbsp;R Edler,&nbsp;C Haley,&nbsp;J Scaria,&nbsp;J Hennings,&nbsp;S Dee,&nbsp;C B Shivley\",\"doi\":\"10.20506/rst.42.3348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on farms is recognised as an important component of antimicrobial stewardship, yet the process can be resource intensive. This paper describes a subset of findings from the first year of a collaboration across government, academia and a private sector veterinary practice focused on swine production in the Midwestern United States. The work is supported by participating farmers and the greater swine industry. Twice-annual collection of samples from pigs along with AMU monitoring occurred on 138 swine farms. Detection and resistance of Escherichia coli from pig tissues was assessed, and associations between AMU and AMR were evaluated. This paper describes the methods utilised and the first-year E. coli-related results from this project. Higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for enrofloxacin and danofloxacin in E. coli from swine tissues were associated with the purchase of fluoroquinolones. There were no other significant associations between MIC and AMU combinations in E. coli isolated from pig tissues. This project represents one of the first attempts to monitor AMU as well as AMR in E. coli in a large-scale commercial swine system in the United States of America.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.42.3348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.42.3348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监测农场的抗菌素使用(AMU)和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)被认为是抗菌素管理的重要组成部分,但这一过程可能是资源密集型的。本文描述了政府、学术界和私营部门兽医实践合作第一年的一些研究结果,重点关注美国中西部的生猪生产。这项工作得到了参与的农民和更大的养猪业的支持。在138个养猪场进行了每年两次的猪样本采集和AMU监测。评估了猪组织中大肠杆菌的检测和耐药性,并评估了AMU和AMR之间的关系。本文介绍了所采用的方法和该项目第一年的大肠杆菌相关结果。猪组织中大肠杆菌对恩诺沙星和danoflo沙星的最低抑制浓度(MIC)与购买氟喹诺酮类药物有关。从猪组织中分离的大肠杆菌中MIC和AMU组合之间没有其他显著关联。该项目是在美国大规模商业养猪系统中监测大肠杆菌中AMU和AMR的首次尝试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance monitoring in pig production in the United States of America.

Monitoring antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on farms is recognised as an important component of antimicrobial stewardship, yet the process can be resource intensive. This paper describes a subset of findings from the first year of a collaboration across government, academia and a private sector veterinary practice focused on swine production in the Midwestern United States. The work is supported by participating farmers and the greater swine industry. Twice-annual collection of samples from pigs along with AMU monitoring occurred on 138 swine farms. Detection and resistance of Escherichia coli from pig tissues was assessed, and associations between AMU and AMR were evaluated. This paper describes the methods utilised and the first-year E. coli-related results from this project. Higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for enrofloxacin and danofloxacin in E. coli from swine tissues were associated with the purchase of fluoroquinolones. There were no other significant associations between MIC and AMU combinations in E. coli isolated from pig tissues. This project represents one of the first attempts to monitor AMU as well as AMR in E. coli in a large-scale commercial swine system in the United States of America.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
期刊最新文献
A Collaborating Centre for animal health economics in the Americas. A methodological framework for attributing the burden of animal disease to specific causes. Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study. Burden assessment of antimicrobial use and resistance in livestock in data-scarce contexts. Estimating livestock biomass across diverse populations and data ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1