调查新冠肺炎大流行期间的耻辱:三级转诊癌症中心员工的生活条件、社会决定因素和感染经历

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100412
Priya Ranganathan , Sandeep Tandon , Sufiyan Khan , Pooja Sharma , Sanjeev Sharma , Gauravi Mishra , Bindhulakshmi Pattadath , Sindhu Nair , Pankaj Rajput , Carlo Caduff
{"title":"调查新冠肺炎大流行期间的耻辱:三级转诊癌症中心员工的生活条件、社会决定因素和感染经历","authors":"Priya Ranganathan ,&nbsp;Sandeep Tandon ,&nbsp;Sufiyan Khan ,&nbsp;Pooja Sharma ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Sharma ,&nbsp;Gauravi Mishra ,&nbsp;Bindhulakshmi Pattadath ,&nbsp;Sindhu Nair ,&nbsp;Pankaj Rajput ,&nbsp;Carlo Caduff","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Healthcare workers (HCWs) have reported negative social experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, this data is largely from medical personnel. We examined living conditions, social determinants, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic among all cadres of employees who had recovered from COVID-19 at a tertiary referral cancer hospital in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a mixed methods study combining a questionnaire-based survey followed by semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions, among hospital staff who recovered from COVID-19 between April and November 2020. We initially administered a 79-point survey to all participants; based on their responses, we used purposive sampling to identify 60 interview participants. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of socio-economic factors on experiences and potential stigma faced by staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We surveyed 376 participants including doctors (10 %), nurses (20 %), support staff (29 %), administrators (18 %) and scientists/technicians (22 %). Of these, 126 (34 %) participants reported negative social experiences. Stigmatisation was lower among doctors compared to other professions, decreased in the second half of the study period, and was more among those living in less affluent surroundings. Interviews revealed 3 types of negative social experiences: neighbourhood tensions around restrictions of mobility, social distancing, and harassment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in India led to considerable negative social experiences among hospital employees, especially those lower in the socio-economic hierarchy, which was fuelled by restrictions imposed by the government and pressure on local neighbourhoods.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>It is important to not just document and count stigma experiences during global pandemics, but also to examine sociologically the conditions under which and the processes through which stigma happens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930404/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic: Living conditions, social determinants and experiences of infection among employees at a tertiary referral cancer centre\",\"authors\":\"Priya Ranganathan ,&nbsp;Sandeep Tandon ,&nbsp;Sufiyan Khan ,&nbsp;Pooja Sharma ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Sharma ,&nbsp;Gauravi Mishra ,&nbsp;Bindhulakshmi Pattadath ,&nbsp;Sindhu Nair ,&nbsp;Pankaj Rajput ,&nbsp;Carlo Caduff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Healthcare workers (HCWs) have reported negative social experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, this data is largely from medical personnel. We examined living conditions, social determinants, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic among all cadres of employees who had recovered from COVID-19 at a tertiary referral cancer hospital in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a mixed methods study combining a questionnaire-based survey followed by semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions, among hospital staff who recovered from COVID-19 between April and November 2020. We initially administered a 79-point survey to all participants; based on their responses, we used purposive sampling to identify 60 interview participants. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of socio-economic factors on experiences and potential stigma faced by staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We surveyed 376 participants including doctors (10 %), nurses (20 %), support staff (29 %), administrators (18 %) and scientists/technicians (22 %). Of these, 126 (34 %) participants reported negative social experiences. Stigmatisation was lower among doctors compared to other professions, decreased in the second half of the study period, and was more among those living in less affluent surroundings. Interviews revealed 3 types of negative social experiences: neighbourhood tensions around restrictions of mobility, social distancing, and harassment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in India led to considerable negative social experiences among hospital employees, especially those lower in the socio-economic hierarchy, which was fuelled by restrictions imposed by the government and pressure on local neighbourhoods.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>It is important to not just document and count stigma experiences during global pandemics, but also to examine sociologically the conditions under which and the processes through which stigma happens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医疗工作者(HCW)报告了新冠肺炎大流行期间的负面社会经历;然而,这些数据主要来自医务人员。我们调查了在新冠肺炎大流行期间,在印度癌症三级转诊医院从新冠肺炎中康复的所有员工干部的生活条件、社会决定因素和经历,在2020年4月至11月期间从新冠肺炎中康复的医院工作人员中。我们最初对所有参与者进行了79分的调查;根据他们的回答,我们使用有目的的抽样来确定60名面试参与者。该研究的主要目的是研究社会经济因素对新冠肺炎大流行期间工作人员的经历和潜在耻辱的影响。结果我们调查了376名参与者,包括医生(10%)、护士(20%)、支持人员(29%)、管理人员(18%)和科学家/技术人员(22%)。其中,126名(34%)参与者报告了负面的社会经历。与其他职业相比,医生的污名化程度较低,在研究期间的后半段有所下降,而生活在不太富裕环境中的医生则更多。采访揭示了三种类型的负面社会体验:围绕行动限制的邻里关系紧张、社交距离和骚扰。结论新冠肺炎疫情在印度的第一阶段导致医院员工,尤其是社会经济等级较低的员工,产生了相当大的负面社会体验,这是由政府施加的限制和对当地社区的压力所推动的。政策摘要重要的是,不仅要记录和统计全球流行病期间的耻辱经历,还要从社会学角度研究耻辱发生的条件和过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic: Living conditions, social determinants and experiences of infection among employees at a tertiary referral cancer centre

Aim

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have reported negative social experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, this data is largely from medical personnel. We examined living conditions, social determinants, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic among all cadres of employees who had recovered from COVID-19 at a tertiary referral cancer hospital in India.

Methods

We conducted a mixed methods study combining a questionnaire-based survey followed by semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions, among hospital staff who recovered from COVID-19 between April and November 2020. We initially administered a 79-point survey to all participants; based on their responses, we used purposive sampling to identify 60 interview participants. The primary aim of the study was to examine the impact of socio-economic factors on experiences and potential stigma faced by staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

We surveyed 376 participants including doctors (10 %), nurses (20 %), support staff (29 %), administrators (18 %) and scientists/technicians (22 %). Of these, 126 (34 %) participants reported negative social experiences. Stigmatisation was lower among doctors compared to other professions, decreased in the second half of the study period, and was more among those living in less affluent surroundings. Interviews revealed 3 types of negative social experiences: neighbourhood tensions around restrictions of mobility, social distancing, and harassment.

Conclusions

The first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in India led to considerable negative social experiences among hospital employees, especially those lower in the socio-economic hierarchy, which was fuelled by restrictions imposed by the government and pressure on local neighbourhoods.

Policy summary

It is important to not just document and count stigma experiences during global pandemics, but also to examine sociologically the conditions under which and the processes through which stigma happens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Income disparities have a significant impact on thyroid cancer recurrence and survival An assessment of cancer centre level designation and guideline adherent care in those with rectal cancer: A population based retrospective cohort study Spending on anticancer drugs among Medicare beneficiaries: Analyzing predictors of drug expenditures Barriers to identifying and addressing health-related social needs in cancer care: Patient and patient navigator perspectives Analysis of factors associated with use of real-world data in single technology appraisals of cancer drugs by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1