[在第2号法律中治疗自决的能力和权利]。219/2017。精神和认知障碍患者的案例。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Rivista di psichiatria Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1708/4056.40385
Edda Mariaelisa Turla, Corinna Porteri
{"title":"[在第2号法律中治疗自决的能力和权利]。219/2017。精神和认知障碍患者的案例。","authors":"Edda Mariaelisa Turla,&nbsp;Corinna Porteri","doi":"10.1708/4056.40385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Law no. 219/2017 represents Italy's most comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at enabling the exercise of the right to therapeutic self-determination and ensuring its best expression even for people without legal or natural capacity, through the tools of informed consent, shared care planning and advance care directives. Nevertheless, some criticalities affect the wording of the law, characterised by a promiscuous and heterogeneous use of the terms referring to capacity and by their interpretability. These criticalities may compromise the benefits of the law provisions at the implementation level, with particular reference to persons who may have a condition of limited capacity due to a psychiatric or cognitive disorder. We analysed the concept of capacity in the law and its critical aspects, both on a hermeneutical and applicative level. The analysis shows the difficulty of reconciling the rigidity of the legal categories of capacity with the changing and multifaceted nature of the clinical conditions. We underlined that possible correctives can come from both the healthcare contexts and legal practitioners and must be aimed at achieving maximum approximation between the formal plan of the law and the real contexts of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Capacity and right to therapeutic self-determination in law no. 219/2017. The case of persons with psychiatric and cognitive disorder.]\",\"authors\":\"Edda Mariaelisa Turla,&nbsp;Corinna Porteri\",\"doi\":\"10.1708/4056.40385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Law no. 219/2017 represents Italy's most comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at enabling the exercise of the right to therapeutic self-determination and ensuring its best expression even for people without legal or natural capacity, through the tools of informed consent, shared care planning and advance care directives. Nevertheless, some criticalities affect the wording of the law, characterised by a promiscuous and heterogeneous use of the terms referring to capacity and by their interpretability. These criticalities may compromise the benefits of the law provisions at the implementation level, with particular reference to persons who may have a condition of limited capacity due to a psychiatric or cognitive disorder. We analysed the concept of capacity in the law and its critical aspects, both on a hermeneutical and applicative level. The analysis shows the difficulty of reconciling the rigidity of the legal categories of capacity with the changing and multifaceted nature of the clinical conditions. We underlined that possible correctives can come from both the healthcare contexts and legal practitioners and must be aimed at achieving maximum approximation between the formal plan of the law and the real contexts of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1708/4056.40385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4056.40385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律没有。219/2017代表了意大利最全面的监管框架,旨在通过知情同意、共享护理计划和预先护理指示等工具,使没有法律或自然行为能力的人能够行使治疗自决权,并确保其最佳表达。然而,一些批评影响了法律的措辞,其特点是对有关能力的术语的使用混杂和不一致,以及这些术语的可解释性。这些批评可能会损害法律条款在执行层面的好处,特别是涉及到由于精神或认知障碍而可能出现能力有限状况的人。我们分析了法律中的能力概念及其关键方面,无论是在解释学层面还是在应用层面。分析表明,调和能力的法律类别的刚性与临床条件的变化和多面性的困难。我们强调,可能的纠正措施可以来自保健环境和法律从业人员,其目的必须是在法律的正式计划和实际护理环境之间实现最大程度的接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Capacity and right to therapeutic self-determination in law no. 219/2017. The case of persons with psychiatric and cognitive disorder.]

Law no. 219/2017 represents Italy's most comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at enabling the exercise of the right to therapeutic self-determination and ensuring its best expression even for people without legal or natural capacity, through the tools of informed consent, shared care planning and advance care directives. Nevertheless, some criticalities affect the wording of the law, characterised by a promiscuous and heterogeneous use of the terms referring to capacity and by their interpretability. These criticalities may compromise the benefits of the law provisions at the implementation level, with particular reference to persons who may have a condition of limited capacity due to a psychiatric or cognitive disorder. We analysed the concept of capacity in the law and its critical aspects, both on a hermeneutical and applicative level. The analysis shows the difficulty of reconciling the rigidity of the legal categories of capacity with the changing and multifaceted nature of the clinical conditions. We underlined that possible correctives can come from both the healthcare contexts and legal practitioners and must be aimed at achieving maximum approximation between the formal plan of the law and the real contexts of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
期刊最新文献
[Taking care of minor offenders: between methodological practices and experience.] Group psychoeducation for patients with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study on effectiveness in delaying relapse episodes and intensity. 'I Can't Get No Satisfaction'… Experience in the treatment, satisfaction, and professional support of young depressed people using SPARX. Problematic use of Internet in a sample of psychiatric outpatients: preliminary observations from the "real world". Suicide-risk-related factors in a psychiatric patient cohort: a cross sectional study on outpatients, inpatients, and therapeutic community patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1