结直肠癌的地理和人口差异:国家癌症数据库分析。

Turab Mohammed, Rohit Gosain, Navpreet Rana, Riccardo Lemini, Katy Wang, Asna Agha, Arun Neupane, Emmanuel M Gabriel, Steven Nurkin, Patrick Boland
{"title":"结直肠癌的地理和人口差异:国家癌症数据库分析。","authors":"Turab Mohammed,&nbsp;Rohit Gosain,&nbsp;Navpreet Rana,&nbsp;Riccardo Lemini,&nbsp;Katy Wang,&nbsp;Asna Agha,&nbsp;Arun Neupane,&nbsp;Emmanuel M Gabriel,&nbsp;Steven Nurkin,&nbsp;Patrick Boland","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Area of residence may adversely affect survival and outcomes in many cancers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of geographical and demographic disparities on survival of patients with colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) colon, rectosigmoid, and rectal datasets. Patients were categorized by area of residence, namely, metropolitan (MA), urban (UA), or rural (RA). Sociodemographic and tumor-related data were collected and analyzed to evaluate variables affecting overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 973,139 patients between 2004 and 2013 were included in the study, of which 83%, 15%, and 2% were MA, UA, and RA residents, respectively. RA and UA patients were mostly white male with low income and no comorbidities. In univariate analysis, OS was worse for RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10) and UA (HR 1.06) colorectal cancer patients than that for MA colorectal cancer patients. In multivariate analysis revealed significant association between OS and geographic residence, with worse OS for RA (HR 1.02, p = 0.04) and UA (HR 1.01, p = 0.003) patients. Black (HR 1.14) and Native American (HR 1.17) patients had worse outcomes, while Asians (HR 0.8), women (HR 0.88), and patients with higher income had improved OS (HR 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differences in the OS for RA and UA patients with colorectal cancer were significantly driven by economic disparity. Area of residence represents an important factor independently limiting access to care, particularly in geographically isolated individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"262-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Turab Mohammed,&nbsp;Rohit Gosain,&nbsp;Navpreet Rana,&nbsp;Riccardo Lemini,&nbsp;Katy Wang,&nbsp;Asna Agha,&nbsp;Arun Neupane,&nbsp;Emmanuel M Gabriel,&nbsp;Steven Nurkin,&nbsp;Patrick Boland\",\"doi\":\"10.56875/2589-0646.1061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Area of residence may adversely affect survival and outcomes in many cancers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of geographical and demographic disparities on survival of patients with colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) colon, rectosigmoid, and rectal datasets. Patients were categorized by area of residence, namely, metropolitan (MA), urban (UA), or rural (RA). Sociodemographic and tumor-related data were collected and analyzed to evaluate variables affecting overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 973,139 patients between 2004 and 2013 were included in the study, of which 83%, 15%, and 2% were MA, UA, and RA residents, respectively. RA and UA patients were mostly white male with low income and no comorbidities. In univariate analysis, OS was worse for RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10) and UA (HR 1.06) colorectal cancer patients than that for MA colorectal cancer patients. In multivariate analysis revealed significant association between OS and geographic residence, with worse OS for RA (HR 1.02, p = 0.04) and UA (HR 1.01, p = 0.003) patients. Black (HR 1.14) and Native American (HR 1.17) patients had worse outcomes, while Asians (HR 0.8), women (HR 0.88), and patients with higher income had improved OS (HR 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differences in the OS for RA and UA patients with colorectal cancer were significantly driven by economic disparity. Area of residence represents an important factor independently limiting access to care, particularly in geographically isolated individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"262-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:居住地区可能对许多癌症患者的生存和预后产生不利影响。本研究的目的是评估地理和人口差异对结直肠癌患者生存的影响。材料和方法:数据来自国家癌症数据库(NCDB)结肠、直肠乙状结肠和直肠数据集。患者按居住区域进行分类,即大都市(MA)、城市(UA)或农村(RA)。收集和分析社会人口学和肿瘤相关数据,以评估影响总生存期(OS)的变量。结果:2004 - 2013年共纳入973,139例患者,其中MA、UA和RA住院患者分别为83%、15%和2%。RA和UA患者多为低收入白人男性,无合并症。在单因素分析中,RA(风险比[HR] 1.10)和UA(风险比[HR] 1.06)结直肠癌患者的OS较MA结直肠癌患者差。多因素分析显示OS与地理居住地有显著相关性,RA (HR 1.02, p = 0.04)和UA (HR 1.01, p = 0.003)患者的OS较差。黑人(HR 1.14)和美洲原住民(HR 1.17)患者的预后较差,而亚洲人(HR 0.8)、女性(HR 0.88)和高收入患者的OS改善(HR 0.88)。结论:结直肠癌RA和UA患者的OS差异受经济差异的显著驱动。居住地区是限制获得保健的一个重要因素,对地理上孤立的个人来说尤其如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Background and objectives: Area of residence may adversely affect survival and outcomes in many cancers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of geographical and demographic disparities on survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

Materials and methods: Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) colon, rectosigmoid, and rectal datasets. Patients were categorized by area of residence, namely, metropolitan (MA), urban (UA), or rural (RA). Sociodemographic and tumor-related data were collected and analyzed to evaluate variables affecting overall survival (OS).

Results: In total, 973,139 patients between 2004 and 2013 were included in the study, of which 83%, 15%, and 2% were MA, UA, and RA residents, respectively. RA and UA patients were mostly white male with low income and no comorbidities. In univariate analysis, OS was worse for RA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10) and UA (HR 1.06) colorectal cancer patients than that for MA colorectal cancer patients. In multivariate analysis revealed significant association between OS and geographic residence, with worse OS for RA (HR 1.02, p = 0.04) and UA (HR 1.01, p = 0.003) patients. Black (HR 1.14) and Native American (HR 1.17) patients had worse outcomes, while Asians (HR 0.8), women (HR 0.88), and patients with higher income had improved OS (HR 0.88).

Conclusion: The differences in the OS for RA and UA patients with colorectal cancer were significantly driven by economic disparity. Area of residence represents an important factor independently limiting access to care, particularly in geographically isolated individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
期刊最新文献
Side Effects After Use of Bedside Thaw Method for Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Allogeneic Transplantations in a Pediatric Cohort: A Single-center Experience. Role of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Adult Immune Hematological Diseases. Improved Quality of Life of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Another Indication for Transplant. Therapy-related Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Risk, Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factor Analysis. Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intraluminal Brachytherapy vs Isolated Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage with internalization for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1