国际注销登记和性别法改革圆桌会议。

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Feminist Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7
Jess Smith, Pieter Cannoot, Pierre Cloutier de Repentigny, Lena Holzer, Shelley Leung, Tanya Ni Mhuirthile, Evan Vipond, Nipuna Varman
{"title":"国际注销登记和性别法改革圆桌会议。","authors":"Jess Smith,&nbsp;Pieter Cannoot,&nbsp;Pierre Cloutier de Repentigny,&nbsp;Lena Holzer,&nbsp;Shelley Leung,&nbsp;Tanya Ni Mhuirthile,&nbsp;Evan Vipond,&nbsp;Nipuna Varman","doi":"10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this roundtable discussion, early-career researchers working in the field of law, gender, and sexuality discuss international and trans-national developments to legal gender. 'The Future of Legal Gender' research project focused on the legislative framework of England and Wales to develop a prototype for decertification. The domestic legislation, however, was situated within a wider international context throughout the project. This roundtable discussion, therefore, provided an opportunity for reflection on the transnational issues raised by decertification, with a particular focus on developments arising in the jurisdiction(s) studied by the early career researchers. The roundtable began with a brief outline of these recent developments before moving to an open discussion on key themes including the value of reform on wider society, changes on-the-ground by non-state actors, and alternative processes for tackling gender inequalities without certifying legal gender. The online conversation took place on 28 June 2021 and has been transcribed and edited for continuity, clarity, and referencing.</p>","PeriodicalId":45822,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Legal Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"145-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034875/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roundtable on Deregistration and Gender Law Reform Internationally.\",\"authors\":\"Jess Smith,&nbsp;Pieter Cannoot,&nbsp;Pierre Cloutier de Repentigny,&nbsp;Lena Holzer,&nbsp;Shelley Leung,&nbsp;Tanya Ni Mhuirthile,&nbsp;Evan Vipond,&nbsp;Nipuna Varman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this roundtable discussion, early-career researchers working in the field of law, gender, and sexuality discuss international and trans-national developments to legal gender. 'The Future of Legal Gender' research project focused on the legislative framework of England and Wales to develop a prototype for decertification. The domestic legislation, however, was situated within a wider international context throughout the project. This roundtable discussion, therefore, provided an opportunity for reflection on the transnational issues raised by decertification, with a particular focus on developments arising in the jurisdiction(s) studied by the early career researchers. The roundtable began with a brief outline of these recent developments before moving to an open discussion on key themes including the value of reform on wider society, changes on-the-ground by non-state actors, and alternative processes for tackling gender inequalities without certifying legal gender. The online conversation took place on 28 June 2021 and has been transcribed and edited for continuity, clarity, and referencing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"145-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这次圆桌讨论中,在法律、性别和性领域工作的早期职业研究人员讨论了法律性别的国际和跨国发展。“法律性别的未来”研究项目侧重于英格兰和威尔士的立法框架,以开发取消认证的原型。然而,在整个项目中,国内立法是在更广泛的国际背景下进行的。因此,这次圆桌会议讨论提供了一个机会,可以对取消核证所引起的跨国问题进行反思,特别侧重于早期职业研究人员所研究的司法管辖区的发展情况。圆桌会议首先简要概述了这些最新发展,然后就关键主题进行了公开讨论,包括改革对更广泛社会的价值、非国家行为体在实地的变化,以及在不证明法律性别的情况下解决性别不平等问题的替代程序。该在线对话发生于2021年6月28日,为了连续性、清晰度和参考,已进行了转录和编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roundtable on Deregistration and Gender Law Reform Internationally.

In this roundtable discussion, early-career researchers working in the field of law, gender, and sexuality discuss international and trans-national developments to legal gender. 'The Future of Legal Gender' research project focused on the legislative framework of England and Wales to develop a prototype for decertification. The domestic legislation, however, was situated within a wider international context throughout the project. This roundtable discussion, therefore, provided an opportunity for reflection on the transnational issues raised by decertification, with a particular focus on developments arising in the jurisdiction(s) studied by the early career researchers. The roundtable began with a brief outline of these recent developments before moving to an open discussion on key themes including the value of reform on wider society, changes on-the-ground by non-state actors, and alternative processes for tackling gender inequalities without certifying legal gender. The online conversation took place on 28 June 2021 and has been transcribed and edited for continuity, clarity, and referencing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Feminist Legal Studies is committed to an internationalist perspective and to the promotion and advancement of feminist scholarship in all areas of law. It aims to publish critical, interdisciplinary, theoretically engaged feminist scholarship relating to law (broadly conceived) and has a particular interest in work that extends feminist debates and analysis by reference to critical and theoretical approaches and perspectives, including postcolonial, transnational and poststructuralist work.  Although the focus of the journal is law, the editorial board encourages the submission of papers from people working outside the academy, as well as academics other than lawyers as well as interdisciplinary work addressing the concerns not only of lawyers but others, women and men, interested in feminist work. The editorial board is a collective drawn from feminists working at leading law schools across the UK. A full list of the editorial board can found on the Journal’s website: http://www.springer.com/law/international/journal/10691?detailsPage=editorialBoardAlongside traditional articles and book reviews Feminist Legal Studies is committed to publishing material that challenges conventional forms of academic writing/knowledge and encourages creative approaches to scholarship, analysis and debate. Such material is normally published in our “Creative Content” section (see Instructions for Authors for more details). The board also welcomes proposals for themed issues of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Labour Law’s (Mis)Management of Menopausal Workers Those Lucky Enough to Transcend Gender: Travis Alabanza, Radical Transfeminism, and the Law Gender-Based Violence and Carceral Feminism in Australia: Towards Decarceral Approaches Separate But Equal: Is Segregated Schooling (Still) Good for Girls? The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1