评估儿童疼痛评估量表在线培训课程的法语版本

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine Recherche en Soins Infirmiers Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3917/rsi.148.0040
Julie Chartrand, Juliana Choueiry, Élyse Patry, Jemila S Hamid, Jodi Wilding, Jessica Reszel, Nicholas Mitsakakis, Denise Harrison
{"title":"评估儿童疼痛评估量表在线培训课程的法语版本","authors":"Julie Chartrand,&nbsp;Juliana Choueiry,&nbsp;Élyse Patry,&nbsp;Jemila S Hamid,&nbsp;Jodi Wilding,&nbsp;Jessica Reszel,&nbsp;Nicholas Mitsakakis,&nbsp;Denise Harrison","doi":"10.3917/rsi.148.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is no French-language training to educate nurses on the use of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scale, whose scores guide the treatment of pediatric pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate a French online training program for the FLACC scale offered to Francophone undergraduate nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online training was offered to nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course. Participants completed online questionnaires pre- and post-training to assess their perception of their knowledge and confidence, the accuracy of their pain assessment scores, as well as the usefulness and user-friendliness of the training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FLACC online training improved students’ perceived knowledge (p = 0.0004) and confidence (p = 0.0053) in the FLACC pediatric pain scale. Students’ accuracy of severe pain assessment scores significantly improved (p = 0.0159) and slightly improved for moderate pain (p = 0.6363). However, accuracy for mild pain assessment was slightly decreased post-training (p = 0.7686).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An improvement of the quality of videos linked to mild pain, and the quantity of videos for all levels of pain, is required for this study to be replicated among a larger sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online training fills the gap in nurses’ lack of knowledge about the use of the FLACC pain scale and improves access to quality training in French.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the French version of an online training course for a pediatric pain assessment scale\",\"authors\":\"Julie Chartrand,&nbsp;Juliana Choueiry,&nbsp;Élyse Patry,&nbsp;Jemila S Hamid,&nbsp;Jodi Wilding,&nbsp;Jessica Reszel,&nbsp;Nicholas Mitsakakis,&nbsp;Denise Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rsi.148.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is no French-language training to educate nurses on the use of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scale, whose scores guide the treatment of pediatric pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate a French online training program for the FLACC scale offered to Francophone undergraduate nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online training was offered to nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course. Participants completed online questionnaires pre- and post-training to assess their perception of their knowledge and confidence, the accuracy of their pain assessment scores, as well as the usefulness and user-friendliness of the training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FLACC online training improved students’ perceived knowledge (p = 0.0004) and confidence (p = 0.0053) in the FLACC pediatric pain scale. Students’ accuracy of severe pain assessment scores significantly improved (p = 0.0159) and slightly improved for moderate pain (p = 0.6363). However, accuracy for mild pain assessment was slightly decreased post-training (p = 0.7686).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An improvement of the quality of videos linked to mild pain, and the quantity of videos for all levels of pain, is required for this study to be replicated among a larger sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online training fills the gap in nurses’ lack of knowledge about the use of the FLACC pain scale and improves access to quality training in French.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.148.0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.148.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:没有法语培训来教育护士如何使用面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(FLACC)疼痛量表,该量表的评分指导儿科疼痛的治疗。目的:本研究的目的是评估法语本科护理学生FLACC量表的法语在线培训计划。方法:对注册儿科护理课程的护生进行在线培训。参与者在培训前和培训后完成在线问卷,以评估他们对自己的知识和信心的感知,他们的疼痛评估分数的准确性,以及培训的有用性和用户友好性。结果:FLACC在线培训提高了学生对FLACC儿童疼痛量表的感知知识(p = 0.0004)和信心(p = 0.0053)。学生对重度疼痛评分的准确性显著提高(p = 0.0159),对中度疼痛评分的准确性略有提高(p = 0.6363)。然而,训练后轻度疼痛评估的准确性略有下降(p = 0.7686)。讨论:为了在更大的样本中复制本研究,需要改进与轻度疼痛相关的视频质量,以及所有疼痛级别的视频数量。结论:在线培训填补了护士对FLACC疼痛量表使用知识缺乏的空白,提高了法语培训的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the French version of an online training course for a pediatric pain assessment scale

Context: There is no French-language training to educate nurses on the use of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scale, whose scores guide the treatment of pediatric pain.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate a French online training program for the FLACC scale offered to Francophone undergraduate nursing students.

Methods: Online training was offered to nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course. Participants completed online questionnaires pre- and post-training to assess their perception of their knowledge and confidence, the accuracy of their pain assessment scores, as well as the usefulness and user-friendliness of the training.

Results: The FLACC online training improved students’ perceived knowledge (p = 0.0004) and confidence (p = 0.0053) in the FLACC pediatric pain scale. Students’ accuracy of severe pain assessment scores significantly improved (p = 0.0159) and slightly improved for moderate pain (p = 0.6363). However, accuracy for mild pain assessment was slightly decreased post-training (p = 0.7686).

Discussion: An improvement of the quality of videos linked to mild pain, and the quantity of videos for all levels of pain, is required for this study to be replicated among a larger sample.

Conclusion: The online training fills the gap in nurses’ lack of knowledge about the use of the FLACC pain scale and improves access to quality training in French.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Supporting nursing students with dyslexia: The situation in France in 2022 and outlook For a better understanding of the profile of nurses working in France who hold or are working toward a Ph.D: A quantitative descriptive study “It’s possible”, reducing the coercion in care for adults living with neurodevelopmental disorders: A mixed-methods study For a better understanding of the relationship between caregivers and young adults living with a concomitant substance-related mental health and substance use disorder: An integrative review The value of preventing constipation in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis: An advanced practice nursing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1