利用机器学习预测淀粉样蛋白β阳性与MRI参数和认知功能。

Hye Jin Park, Ji Young Lee, Jin-Ju Yang, Hee-Jin Kim, Young Seo Kim, Ji Young Kim, Yun Young Choi
{"title":"利用机器学习预测淀粉样蛋白β阳性与MRI参数和认知功能。","authors":"Hye Jin Park,&nbsp;Ji Young Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Ju Yang,&nbsp;Hee-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Young Seo Kim,&nbsp;Ji Young Kim,&nbsp;Yun Young Choi","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2022.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the MRI markers for the prediction of amyloid β (Aβ)-positivity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to evaluate the differences in MRI markers between Aβ-positive (Aβ [+]) and -negative groups using the machine learning (ML) method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 139 patients with MCI and AD who underwent amyloid PET-CT and brain MRI. Patients were divided into Aβ (+) (<i>n</i> = 84) and Aβ-negative (<i>n</i> = 55) groups. Visual analysis was performed with the Fazekas scale of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMB) scores. The WMH volume and regional brain volume were quantitatively measured. The multivariable logistic regression and ML using support vector machine, and logistic regression were used to identify the best MRI predictors of Aβ-positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Fazekas scale of WMH (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and CMB scores (<i>p</i> = 0.04) were higher in Aβ (+). The volumes of hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and precuneus were smaller in Aβ (+) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The third ventricle volume was larger in Aβ (+) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The logistic regression of ML showed a good accuracy (81.1%) with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and regional brain volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of ML using the MMSE, third ventricle, and hippocampal volume is helpful in predicting Aβ-positivity with a good accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/34/jksr-84-638.PMC10265247.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Amyloid β-Positivity with both MRI Parameters and Cognitive Function Using Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Jin Park,&nbsp;Ji Young Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Ju Yang,&nbsp;Hee-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Young Seo Kim,&nbsp;Ji Young Kim,&nbsp;Yun Young Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/jksr.2022.0084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the MRI markers for the prediction of amyloid β (Aβ)-positivity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to evaluate the differences in MRI markers between Aβ-positive (Aβ [+]) and -negative groups using the machine learning (ML) method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 139 patients with MCI and AD who underwent amyloid PET-CT and brain MRI. Patients were divided into Aβ (+) (<i>n</i> = 84) and Aβ-negative (<i>n</i> = 55) groups. Visual analysis was performed with the Fazekas scale of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMB) scores. The WMH volume and regional brain volume were quantitatively measured. The multivariable logistic regression and ML using support vector machine, and logistic regression were used to identify the best MRI predictors of Aβ-positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Fazekas scale of WMH (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and CMB scores (<i>p</i> = 0.04) were higher in Aβ (+). The volumes of hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and precuneus were smaller in Aβ (+) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The third ventricle volume was larger in Aβ (+) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The logistic regression of ML showed a good accuracy (81.1%) with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and regional brain volumes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of ML using the MMSE, third ventricle, and hippocampal volume is helpful in predicting Aβ-positivity with a good accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/34/jksr-84-638.PMC10265247.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨MRI标志物对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)阳性的预测作用,并应用机器学习(ML)方法评价Aβ阳性(Aβ[+])组与阴性组间MRI标志物的差异。材料和方法:本研究纳入139例MCI和AD患者,接受淀粉样蛋白PET-CT和脑MRI检查。患者分为Aβ阳性(n = 84)组和Aβ阴性(n = 55)组。采用Fazekas白质高强度(WMH)量表和脑微出血(CMB)评分进行目视分析。定量测定WMH体积和局部脑体积。采用多变量logistic回归、支持向量机ML、logistic回归等方法确定a β阳性的最佳MRI预测因子。结果:Fazekas WMH评分(p = 0.02)和CMB评分(p = 0.04)以Aβ(+)较高。Aβ(+)大鼠海马、内嗅皮质、楔前叶体积较小(p < 0.05)。Aβ(+)组第三脑室容积较大(p = 0.002)。最小精神状态检查(MMSE)和区域脑容量对ML的逻辑回归显示出良好的准确率(81.1%)。结论:利用MMSE、第三脑室和海马体积进行ML检测有助于预测a β阳性,准确度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of Amyloid β-Positivity with both MRI Parameters and Cognitive Function Using Machine Learning.

Purpose: To investigate the MRI markers for the prediction of amyloid β (Aβ)-positivity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to evaluate the differences in MRI markers between Aβ-positive (Aβ [+]) and -negative groups using the machine learning (ML) method.

Materials and methods: This study included 139 patients with MCI and AD who underwent amyloid PET-CT and brain MRI. Patients were divided into Aβ (+) (n = 84) and Aβ-negative (n = 55) groups. Visual analysis was performed with the Fazekas scale of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMB) scores. The WMH volume and regional brain volume were quantitatively measured. The multivariable logistic regression and ML using support vector machine, and logistic regression were used to identify the best MRI predictors of Aβ-positivity.

Results: The Fazekas scale of WMH (p = 0.02) and CMB scores (p = 0.04) were higher in Aβ (+). The volumes of hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and precuneus were smaller in Aβ (+) (p < 0.05). The third ventricle volume was larger in Aβ (+) (p = 0.002). The logistic regression of ML showed a good accuracy (81.1%) with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and regional brain volumes.

Conclusion: The application of ML using the MMSE, third ventricle, and hippocampal volume is helpful in predicting Aβ-positivity with a good accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rare Manifestation of the Cutaneous and Cervical Lymph Node Metastases of Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder: A Case Report. Persistent Primitive Olfactory Artery Type 4 with Fusiform Aneurysm: A Case Report. Recurrent Post-Traumatic Adrenal Bleeding after Transcatheter Arterial Embolization: A Case Report. Typical and Atypical Imaging Features of Malignant Lymphoma in the Abdomen and Mimicking Diseases. Immunoglobulin G4-Related Lung Disease with Waxing and Waning Pulmonary Infiltrates: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1