对直接和间接信息请求的椭圆形答复。

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Language and Speech Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-10 DOI:10.1177/00238309231176526
Katherine Chia, Michael P Kaschak
{"title":"对直接和间接信息请求的椭圆形答复。","authors":"Katherine Chia, Michael P Kaschak","doi":"10.1177/00238309231176526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present two studies examining the factors that lead speakers to produce elliptical responses to requests for information. Following Clark and Levelt and Kelter, experimenters called businesses and asked about their closing time (e.g., <i>Can you tell me what time you close?</i>). Participants provided the requested information in full sentence responses (<i>We close at 9</i>) or elliptical responses (<i>At 9</i>). A reanalysis of data from previous experiments using this paradigm shows that participants are more likely to produce an elliptical response when the question is a direct request for information (<i>What time do you close?</i>) than when the question is an indirect request for information (<i>Can you tell me what time you close?</i>). Participants were less likely to produce an elliptical response when they began their answer by providing a yes/no response (e.g., <i>Sure . . . we close at 9</i>). A new experiment replicated these findings, and further showed that elliptical responses were less likely when (1) irrelevant linguistic content was inserted between the question and the participant's response, and (2) participants verbalized signs of difficulty retrieving the requested information. This latter effect is most prominent in response to questions that are seen as very polite (<i>May I ask you what time you close?</i>). We discuss the role that the recoverability of the intended meaning of the ellipsis, the accessibility of potential antecedents for the ellipsis, pragmatic factors, and memory retrieval play in shaping the production of ellipsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51255,"journal":{"name":"Language and Speech","volume":" ","pages":"228-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elliptical Responses to Direct and Indirect Requests for Information.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Chia, Michael P Kaschak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00238309231176526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present two studies examining the factors that lead speakers to produce elliptical responses to requests for information. Following Clark and Levelt and Kelter, experimenters called businesses and asked about their closing time (e.g., <i>Can you tell me what time you close?</i>). Participants provided the requested information in full sentence responses (<i>We close at 9</i>) or elliptical responses (<i>At 9</i>). A reanalysis of data from previous experiments using this paradigm shows that participants are more likely to produce an elliptical response when the question is a direct request for information (<i>What time do you close?</i>) than when the question is an indirect request for information (<i>Can you tell me what time you close?</i>). Participants were less likely to produce an elliptical response when they began their answer by providing a yes/no response (e.g., <i>Sure . . . we close at 9</i>). A new experiment replicated these findings, and further showed that elliptical responses were less likely when (1) irrelevant linguistic content was inserted between the question and the participant's response, and (2) participants verbalized signs of difficulty retrieving the requested information. This latter effect is most prominent in response to questions that are seen as very polite (<i>May I ask you what time you close?</i>). We discuss the role that the recoverability of the intended meaning of the ellipsis, the accessibility of potential antecedents for the ellipsis, pragmatic factors, and memory retrieval play in shaping the production of ellipsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Speech\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Speech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309231176526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309231176526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了两项研究,考察了导致说话者对信息请求做出省略回答的因素。按照 Clark、Levelt 和 Kelter 的方法,实验者打电话给商家,询问他们的关门时间(例如,您能告诉我你们几点关门吗?)受试者以整句回答(我们 9 点关门)或省略句回答(9 点)的方式提供所要求的信息。对以前使用该范式进行的实验数据的重新分析表明,当问题是直接要求提供信息时(你们几点关门? ),参与者更有可能做出椭圆形回答,而当问题是间接要求提供信息时(你能告诉我你们几点关门吗?)当参与者以 "是"/"否 "开头回答问题时(例如:"当然......我们 9 点关门),他们做出椭圆形回答的可能性较小。一项新的实验重复了这些发现,并进一步表明,当(1)在问题和被试者的回答之间插入无关的语言内容,以及(2)被试者口头表示难以检索所要求的信息时,椭圆回答的可能性更低。后一种效应在回答被认为是非常礼貌的问题(请问您几点下班?)我们讨论了省略号预期意义的可恢复性、省略号潜在前因的可获得性、语用因素和记忆检索在影响省略号产生中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elliptical Responses to Direct and Indirect Requests for Information.

We present two studies examining the factors that lead speakers to produce elliptical responses to requests for information. Following Clark and Levelt and Kelter, experimenters called businesses and asked about their closing time (e.g., Can you tell me what time you close?). Participants provided the requested information in full sentence responses (We close at 9) or elliptical responses (At 9). A reanalysis of data from previous experiments using this paradigm shows that participants are more likely to produce an elliptical response when the question is a direct request for information (What time do you close?) than when the question is an indirect request for information (Can you tell me what time you close?). Participants were less likely to produce an elliptical response when they began their answer by providing a yes/no response (e.g., Sure . . . we close at 9). A new experiment replicated these findings, and further showed that elliptical responses were less likely when (1) irrelevant linguistic content was inserted between the question and the participant's response, and (2) participants verbalized signs of difficulty retrieving the requested information. This latter effect is most prominent in response to questions that are seen as very polite (May I ask you what time you close?). We discuss the role that the recoverability of the intended meaning of the ellipsis, the accessibility of potential antecedents for the ellipsis, pragmatic factors, and memory retrieval play in shaping the production of ellipsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language and Speech
Language and Speech AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language and Speech is a peer-reviewed journal which provides an international forum for communication among researchers in the disciplines that contribute to our understanding of the production, perception, processing, learning, use, and disorders of speech and language. The journal accepts reports of original research in all these areas.
期刊最新文献
Prosodic Cues for Broad, Narrow, and Corrective Focus in Persian. Effects of Systematicity on Word Learning in Preschool Children: The Case of Semitic Morpho-Phonology. How Templatic Is Arabic Input to Children? The Role of Child-Directed-Speech in the Acquisition of Semitic Morpho-Phonology. Preference for Distinct Variants in Learning Sound Correspondences During Dialect Acquisition. Politeness and Prosody: The Effect of Power, Distance, and Imposition on Pitch Contours in Spanish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1