基于计算仿真的标准3D打印喷嘴与气动和活塞驱动生物打印的锥形喷嘴的对比分析。

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Bioprinting Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18063/ijb.730
Juan Carlos Gómez-Blanco, J Blas Pagador, Victor P Galván-Chacón, Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta, Manuel Matamoros, Alfonso Marcos, Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo
{"title":"基于计算仿真的标准3D打印喷嘴与气动和活塞驱动生物打印的锥形喷嘴的对比分析。","authors":"Juan Carlos Gómez-Blanco,&nbsp;J Blas Pagador,&nbsp;Victor P Galván-Chacón,&nbsp;Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta,&nbsp;Manuel Matamoros,&nbsp;Alfonso Marcos,&nbsp;Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo","doi":"10.18063/ijb.730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioprinting is an application of additive manufacturing that can deliver promising results in regenerative medicine. Hydrogels, as the most used materials in bioprinting, are experimentally analyzed to assure printability and suitability for cell culture. Besides hydrogel features, the inner geometry of the microextrusion head might have an equal impact not only on printability but also on cellular viability. In this regard, standard 3D printing nozzles have been widely studied to reduce inner pressure and get faster printings using highly viscous melted polymers. Computational fluid dynamics is a useful tool capable of simulating and predicting the hydrogel behavior when the extruder inner geometry is modified. Hence, the objective of this work is to comparatively study the performance of a standard 3D printing and conical nozzles in a microextrusion bioprinting process through computational simulation. Three bioprinting parameters, namely pressure, velocity, and shear stress, were calculated using the level-set method, considering a 22G conical tip and a 0.4 mm nozzle. Additionally, two microextrusion models, pneumatic and piston-driven, were simulated using dispensing pressure (15 kPa) and volumetric flow (10 mm<sup>3</sup>/s) as input, respectively. The results showed that the standard nozzle is suitable for bioprinting procedures. Specifically, the inner geometry of the nozzle increases the flow rate, while reducing the dispensing pressure and maintaining similar shear stress compared to the conical tip commonly used in bioprinting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48522,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioprinting","volume":"9 4","pages":"730"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/a3/IJB-9-4-730.PMC10261129.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational simulation-based comparative analysis of standard 3D printing and conical nozzles for pneumatic and piston-driven bioprinting.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Gómez-Blanco,&nbsp;J Blas Pagador,&nbsp;Victor P Galván-Chacón,&nbsp;Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta,&nbsp;Manuel Matamoros,&nbsp;Alfonso Marcos,&nbsp;Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo\",\"doi\":\"10.18063/ijb.730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioprinting is an application of additive manufacturing that can deliver promising results in regenerative medicine. Hydrogels, as the most used materials in bioprinting, are experimentally analyzed to assure printability and suitability for cell culture. Besides hydrogel features, the inner geometry of the microextrusion head might have an equal impact not only on printability but also on cellular viability. In this regard, standard 3D printing nozzles have been widely studied to reduce inner pressure and get faster printings using highly viscous melted polymers. Computational fluid dynamics is a useful tool capable of simulating and predicting the hydrogel behavior when the extruder inner geometry is modified. Hence, the objective of this work is to comparatively study the performance of a standard 3D printing and conical nozzles in a microextrusion bioprinting process through computational simulation. Three bioprinting parameters, namely pressure, velocity, and shear stress, were calculated using the level-set method, considering a 22G conical tip and a 0.4 mm nozzle. Additionally, two microextrusion models, pneumatic and piston-driven, were simulated using dispensing pressure (15 kPa) and volumetric flow (10 mm<sup>3</sup>/s) as input, respectively. The results showed that the standard nozzle is suitable for bioprinting procedures. Specifically, the inner geometry of the nozzle increases the flow rate, while reducing the dispensing pressure and maintaining similar shear stress compared to the conical tip commonly used in bioprinting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/a3/IJB-9-4-730.PMC10261129.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.730\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

生物打印是增材制造的一种应用,可以在再生医学中提供有希望的结果。水凝胶作为生物打印中最常用的材料,对其进行了实验分析,以确保其可打印性和细胞培养的适用性。除了水凝胶的特点,微挤出头的内部几何形状可能不仅对可打印性而且对细胞活力也有同样的影响。在这方面,标准3D打印喷嘴已经被广泛研究,以降低内部压力,并使用高粘性熔融聚合物获得更快的打印速度。计算流体力学是模拟和预测挤出机内部几何形状变化时水凝胶行为的有效工具。因此,本研究的目的是通过计算模拟,比较研究标准3D打印喷嘴和锥形喷嘴在微挤压生物打印过程中的性能。考虑到22G的锥形尖端和0.4 mm的喷嘴,采用水平集方法计算了三个生物打印参数,即压力、速度和剪切应力。此外,分别以点胶压力(15 kPa)和体积流量(10 mm3/s)为输入,模拟了气动和活塞驱动两种微挤压模型。结果表明,该标准喷嘴适用于生物打印过程。具体来说,与生物打印中常用的锥形喷嘴相比,喷嘴的内部几何形状增加了流速,同时降低了点胶压力并保持了相似的剪切应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computational simulation-based comparative analysis of standard 3D printing and conical nozzles for pneumatic and piston-driven bioprinting.

Bioprinting is an application of additive manufacturing that can deliver promising results in regenerative medicine. Hydrogels, as the most used materials in bioprinting, are experimentally analyzed to assure printability and suitability for cell culture. Besides hydrogel features, the inner geometry of the microextrusion head might have an equal impact not only on printability but also on cellular viability. In this regard, standard 3D printing nozzles have been widely studied to reduce inner pressure and get faster printings using highly viscous melted polymers. Computational fluid dynamics is a useful tool capable of simulating and predicting the hydrogel behavior when the extruder inner geometry is modified. Hence, the objective of this work is to comparatively study the performance of a standard 3D printing and conical nozzles in a microextrusion bioprinting process through computational simulation. Three bioprinting parameters, namely pressure, velocity, and shear stress, were calculated using the level-set method, considering a 22G conical tip and a 0.4 mm nozzle. Additionally, two microextrusion models, pneumatic and piston-driven, were simulated using dispensing pressure (15 kPa) and volumetric flow (10 mm3/s) as input, respectively. The results showed that the standard nozzle is suitable for bioprinting procedures. Specifically, the inner geometry of the nozzle increases the flow rate, while reducing the dispensing pressure and maintaining similar shear stress compared to the conical tip commonly used in bioprinting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bioprinting is a globally recognized publication that focuses on the advancements, scientific discoveries, and practical implementations of Bioprinting. Bioprinting, in simple terms, involves the utilization of 3D printing technology and materials that contain living cells or biological components to fabricate tissues or other biotechnological products. Our journal encompasses interdisciplinary research that spans across technology, science, and clinical applications within the expansive realm of Bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
Additive-manufactured synthetic bone model with biomimicking tunable mechanical properties for evaluation of medical implants Designing a 3D-printed medical implant with mechanically macrostructural topology and microbionic lattices: A novel wedge-shaped spacer for high tibial osteotomy and biomechanical study PBF-LB fabrication of microgrooves for induction of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells Building a degradable scaffold with 3D printing using Masquelet technique to promote osteoblast differentiation and angiogenesis in chronic tibial osteomyelitis with bone defects Design of biomedical gradient porous scaffold via a minimal surface dual-unit continuous transition connection strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1