应用Tinel试验结合临床神经感觉试验鉴别下颌第三磨牙拔除后舌神经病变的自发愈合。

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3
Shigeyuki Fujita, Itaru Tojyo, Shigeru Suzuki, Fumihiro Tajima
{"title":"应用Tinel试验结合临床神经感觉试验鉴别下颌第三磨牙拔除后舌神经病变的自发愈合。","authors":"Shigeyuki Fujita,&nbsp;Itaru Tojyo,&nbsp;Shigeru Suzuki,&nbsp;Fumihiro Tajima","doi":"10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extraction of the mandibular third molar, the most frequent and important surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery, is associated with the risk of injury of the lingual nerve. Neuropathy of the lingual nerve poses diagnostic challenges regarding the transient or permanent nature of the injury. No consensus or criteria have been established regarding the diagnosis of lingual nerve neuropathy. We applied both Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together, which can be easily used at the bedside in the early stages of injury. Therefore, we propose a new method to differentiate between lesions with the ability to heal spontaneously and those that cannot heal without surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients (29 women,  4 men; mean age, 35.5 years) were included in this study. For all patients, the median interval between nerve injury and initial examination was 1.6 months and that between nerve injury and the second examination before determining the need for surgical management was 4.5 months. The patients were assigned to either group A or B. The spontaneous healing group (group A, n = 10) revealed a tendency for recovery within 6 months after tooth extraction. In this group, although there were individual differences in the degree of recovery, a remarkable tendency for recovery was observed based on clinical neurosensory testing in all cases. None of the patients were diagnosed with allodynia. In seven cases, the Tinel test result was negative at the first inspection, and in three cases, the result changed to negative at the second inspection. Conversely, in group B(n = 23), no recovery trend was observed with regard to clinical neurosensory testing, and nine patients had allodynia. Further, the Tinel test result was positive for all patients in both examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that in case of transient lingual nerve paralysis, clinical neurosensory testing findings deteriorate immediately after tooth extraction and gradually recover, while Tinel's test shows a negative result. Using Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together enabled early and easy identification of the severity of the lingual nerve disorder and of lesions that would heal spontaneously without surgical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277267/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Tinel's test combed with clinical neurosensory test distinguishes spontaneous healing of lingual nerve neuropathy after mandibular third molar extraction.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeyuki Fujita,&nbsp;Itaru Tojyo,&nbsp;Shigeru Suzuki,&nbsp;Fumihiro Tajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extraction of the mandibular third molar, the most frequent and important surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery, is associated with the risk of injury of the lingual nerve. Neuropathy of the lingual nerve poses diagnostic challenges regarding the transient or permanent nature of the injury. No consensus or criteria have been established regarding the diagnosis of lingual nerve neuropathy. We applied both Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together, which can be easily used at the bedside in the early stages of injury. Therefore, we propose a new method to differentiate between lesions with the ability to heal spontaneously and those that cannot heal without surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients (29 women,  4 men; mean age, 35.5 years) were included in this study. For all patients, the median interval between nerve injury and initial examination was 1.6 months and that between nerve injury and the second examination before determining the need for surgical management was 4.5 months. The patients were assigned to either group A or B. The spontaneous healing group (group A, n = 10) revealed a tendency for recovery within 6 months after tooth extraction. In this group, although there were individual differences in the degree of recovery, a remarkable tendency for recovery was observed based on clinical neurosensory testing in all cases. None of the patients were diagnosed with allodynia. In seven cases, the Tinel test result was negative at the first inspection, and in three cases, the result changed to negative at the second inspection. Conversely, in group B(n = 23), no recovery trend was observed with regard to clinical neurosensory testing, and nine patients had allodynia. Further, the Tinel test result was positive for all patients in both examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that in case of transient lingual nerve paralysis, clinical neurosensory testing findings deteriorate immediately after tooth extraction and gradually recover, while Tinel's test shows a negative result. Using Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together enabled early and easy identification of the severity of the lingual nerve disorder and of lesions that would heal spontaneously without surgical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00389-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:下颌第三磨牙的拔除是口腔外科临床实践中最常见和最重要的手术步骤,它具有损伤舌神经的风险。神经病变的舌神经提出诊断挑战,关于暂时或永久性的性质的伤害。关于舌神经病变的诊断尚无共识或标准。我们将Tinel的测试和临床神经感觉测试结合起来,可以很容易地在损伤的早期阶段在床边使用。因此,我们提出了一种新的方法来区分具有自发愈合能力的病变和那些没有手术就无法愈合的病变。结果:33例患者(女性29例,男性4例;平均年龄35.5岁)纳入本研究。所有患者从神经损伤到初次检查的中位间隔为1.6个月,从神经损伤到第二次检查确定是否需要手术治疗的中位间隔为4.5个月。随机分为A组和b组。自发愈合组(n = 10)拔牙后6个月内均有恢复的趋势。在本组中,虽然恢复程度存在个体差异,但基于临床神经感觉测试,所有病例均有显著的恢复趋势。所有患者均未被诊断为异常性疼痛。其中7例第一次检查时Tinel测试结果为阴性,3例第二次检查时结果为阴性。相反,在B组(n = 23),临床神经感觉测试没有恢复趋势,9例患者出现异常性疼痛。此外,在两项检查中,所有患者的Tinel试验结果均为阳性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,一过性舌神经麻痹患者,拔牙后临床神经感觉测试结果立即恶化并逐渐恢复,而Tinel测试结果为阴性。使用Tinel的测试和临床神经感觉测试可以早期和轻松地识别舌神经紊乱的严重程度,以及不需要手术治疗即可自行愈合的病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Tinel's test combed with clinical neurosensory test distinguishes spontaneous healing of lingual nerve neuropathy after mandibular third molar extraction.

Background: Extraction of the mandibular third molar, the most frequent and important surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery, is associated with the risk of injury of the lingual nerve. Neuropathy of the lingual nerve poses diagnostic challenges regarding the transient or permanent nature of the injury. No consensus or criteria have been established regarding the diagnosis of lingual nerve neuropathy. We applied both Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together, which can be easily used at the bedside in the early stages of injury. Therefore, we propose a new method to differentiate between lesions with the ability to heal spontaneously and those that cannot heal without surgery.

Results: Thirty-three patients (29 women,  4 men; mean age, 35.5 years) were included in this study. For all patients, the median interval between nerve injury and initial examination was 1.6 months and that between nerve injury and the second examination before determining the need for surgical management was 4.5 months. The patients were assigned to either group A or B. The spontaneous healing group (group A, n = 10) revealed a tendency for recovery within 6 months after tooth extraction. In this group, although there were individual differences in the degree of recovery, a remarkable tendency for recovery was observed based on clinical neurosensory testing in all cases. None of the patients were diagnosed with allodynia. In seven cases, the Tinel test result was negative at the first inspection, and in three cases, the result changed to negative at the second inspection. Conversely, in group B(n = 23), no recovery trend was observed with regard to clinical neurosensory testing, and nine patients had allodynia. Further, the Tinel test result was positive for all patients in both examinations.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that in case of transient lingual nerve paralysis, clinical neurosensory testing findings deteriorate immediately after tooth extraction and gradually recover, while Tinel's test shows a negative result. Using Tinel's test and clinical neurosensory testing together enabled early and easy identification of the severity of the lingual nerve disorder and of lesions that would heal spontaneously without surgical management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual surgical plan with custom surgical guide for orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. The epidemiological and histopathological factors for delayed local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. A retrospective epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary referral hospital in istanbul: a seven-year study of 1,757 patients. Egyptian patients with cleft lip: our experience with primary rhinoplasty. Volume changes in the contralateral submandibular gland following unilateral gland excision in oral cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1