Kim A. Hoffman , Canyon Foot , Ximena A. Levander , Ryan Cook , Javier Ponce Terashima , John W. McIlveen , P. Todd Korthuis , Dennis McCarty
{"title":"两种农村阿片类药物治疗方案中美沙酮带回家剂量放松后的治疗保留、恢复使用和康复支持:混合方法分析","authors":"Kim A. Hoffman , Canyon Foot , Ximena A. Levander , Ryan Cook , Javier Ponce Terashima , John W. McIlveen , P. Todd Korthuis , Dennis McCarty","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (<em>n</em> = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], <em>p</em> = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], <em>p</em> = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080674/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment retention, return to use, and recovery support following COVID-19 relaxation of methadone take-home dosing in two rural opioid treatment programs: A mixed methods analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kim A. Hoffman , Canyon Foot , Ximena A. Levander , Ryan Cook , Javier Ponce Terashima , John W. McIlveen , P. Todd Korthuis , Dennis McCarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (<em>n</em> = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], <em>p</em> = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], <em>p</em> = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
摘要
2020年3月,美国药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局允许阿片类药物治疗项目(OTPs)放宽对带回家的美沙酮的限制,并促进远程医疗,以尽量减少对COVID-19的潜在暴露。我们评估了为俄勒冈州五个农村县服务的两个otp中与covid -19相关的变化对美沙酮带回家剂量的影响。方法采用混合方法收敛设计。OTPs提取了377例患者的尿药检(UDT)结果、带回家的美沙酮方案和电子健康记录(EHR)中的治疗保留。混合效应负二项回归模型评估了COVID-19政策变化前后患者带回家剂量的差异,以及与停药和UDT阳性的关系。半结构化定性访谈(n = 32)探讨了患者对增加带回家剂量和减少门诊就诊的反应,为定量结果提供背景。结果在接受治疗超过180天的患者中,covid -19后带回家的剂量增加(中位数:每月8剂vs 13剂,p = 0.011)。治疗天数较少的患者,带回家的钱并没有增加。在没有COVID-19政策变化的情况下,带回家剂量每增加一个百分点,与阿片类药物UDT阳性百分比(B = - 0.12, CI [- 0.21, - 0.04], p = 0.005)和停药概率(aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], p = 0.003)呈负相关。定性分析揭示了三个主题,解释了增加的带回家剂量如何支持康复:1)承担更多责任的信任感的价值;2)减少旅行时间,增加就业和娱乐;3)减少与恢复不稳定和潜在诱因的个体的接触。结论在临床稳定的患者中,美沙酮剂量放松与美沙酮带回家剂量增加、保留率改善和UDT阿片阳性结果降低相关。定性调查结果表明,减少带回家的限制是可行和可取的,不会对安全或公共卫生造成危害。
Treatment retention, return to use, and recovery support following COVID-19 relaxation of methadone take-home dosing in two rural opioid treatment programs: A mixed methods analysis
Objectives
In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.
Methods
We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (n = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.
Results
The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, p = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], p = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], p = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.
Conclusions
Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.