两种农村阿片类药物治疗方案中美沙酮带回家剂量放松后的治疗保留、恢复使用和康复支持:混合方法分析

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108801
Kim A. Hoffman , Canyon Foot , Ximena A. Levander , Ryan Cook , Javier Ponce Terashima , John W. McIlveen , P. Todd Korthuis , Dennis McCarty
{"title":"两种农村阿片类药物治疗方案中美沙酮带回家剂量放松后的治疗保留、恢复使用和康复支持:混合方法分析","authors":"Kim A. Hoffman ,&nbsp;Canyon Foot ,&nbsp;Ximena A. Levander ,&nbsp;Ryan Cook ,&nbsp;Javier Ponce Terashima ,&nbsp;John W. McIlveen ,&nbsp;P. Todd Korthuis ,&nbsp;Dennis McCarty","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (<em>n</em> = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], <em>p</em> = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], <em>p</em> = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080674/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment retention, return to use, and recovery support following COVID-19 relaxation of methadone take-home dosing in two rural opioid treatment programs: A mixed methods analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kim A. Hoffman ,&nbsp;Canyon Foot ,&nbsp;Ximena A. Levander ,&nbsp;Ryan Cook ,&nbsp;Javier Ponce Terashima ,&nbsp;John W. McIlveen ,&nbsp;P. Todd Korthuis ,&nbsp;Dennis McCarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (<em>n</em> = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (<em>n</em> = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, <em>p</em> = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], <em>p</em> = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], <em>p</em> = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9080674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

2020年3月,美国药物滥用和精神卫生服务管理局允许阿片类药物治疗项目(OTPs)放宽对带回家的美沙酮的限制,并促进远程医疗,以尽量减少对COVID-19的潜在暴露。我们评估了为俄勒冈州五个农村县服务的两个otp中与covid -19相关的变化对美沙酮带回家剂量的影响。方法采用混合方法收敛设计。OTPs提取了377例患者的尿药检(UDT)结果、带回家的美沙酮方案和电子健康记录(EHR)中的治疗保留。混合效应负二项回归模型评估了COVID-19政策变化前后患者带回家剂量的差异,以及与停药和UDT阳性的关系。半结构化定性访谈(n = 32)探讨了患者对增加带回家剂量和减少门诊就诊的反应,为定量结果提供背景。结果在接受治疗超过180天的患者中,covid -19后带回家的剂量增加(中位数:每月8剂vs 13剂,p = 0.011)。治疗天数较少的患者,带回家的钱并没有增加。在没有COVID-19政策变化的情况下,带回家剂量每增加一个百分点,与阿片类药物UDT阳性百分比(B = - 0.12, CI [- 0.21, - 0.04], p = 0.005)和停药概率(aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], p = 0.003)呈负相关。定性分析揭示了三个主题,解释了增加的带回家剂量如何支持康复:1)承担更多责任的信任感的价值;2)减少旅行时间,增加就业和娱乐;3)减少与恢复不稳定和潜在诱因的个体的接触。结论在临床稳定的患者中,美沙酮剂量放松与美沙酮带回家剂量增加、保留率改善和UDT阿片阳性结果降低相关。定性调查结果表明,减少带回家的限制是可行和可取的,不会对安全或公共卫生造成危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment retention, return to use, and recovery support following COVID-19 relaxation of methadone take-home dosing in two rural opioid treatment programs: A mixed methods analysis

Objectives

In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration permitted Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) to relax restrictions on take-home methadone and promoted telehealth to minimize potential exposures to COVID-19. We assessed the effects of COVID-19-related changes on take-home methadone dosing in two OTPs serving five rural Oregon counties.

Methods

We used a mixed-methods convergent design. The OTPs extracted urine drug test (UDT) results, take-home methadone regimens, and treatment retention from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients (n = 377). A mixed-effects negative binomial regression model assessed patient-level differences in take-home doses before and after the COVID-19 policy changes and the associations with treatment discontinuation, and UDT positivity. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 32) explored patient reactions to increased take-home dosing and reduced clinic visits to provide context for quantitative findings.

Results

The number of take-home doses increased in the post-COVID-19 period for patients engaged in treatment for more than 180 days (median: 8 vs 13 take-home doses per month, p = 0.011). Take-homes did not increase for patients with fewer days of treatment. Each percentage point increase in take-home dosing above what would be expected without COVID-19 policy changes was negatively associated with the percent of UDT positive for opioids (B = −0.12, CI [−0.21, −0.04], p = 0.005) and the probability of treatment discontinuation (aOR = 0.97, CI [0.95, 0.99], p = 0.003). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes explaining how increased take-home dosing supported recovery: 1) value of feeling trusted with increased responsibility; 2) reduced travel time permitted increased employment and recreation; and 3) reduced exposure to individuals less stable in recovery and potential triggers.

Conclusions

Take-home methadone dose relaxations were associated with increased methadone take-home doses, improved retention, and decreased UDT opioid positive results among clinically stable patients. Qualitative findings suggest that fewer take-home restrictions are feasible and desirable and do not pose safety or public health harms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1