教师素质公共评论:媒体对教学绩效评估的评论分析。

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Educational Researcher Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7
Donna Pendergast, Beryl Exley, Frances Hoyte
{"title":"教师素质公共评论:媒体对教学绩效评估的评论分析。","authors":"Donna Pendergast,&nbsp;Beryl Exley,&nbsp;Frances Hoyte","doi":"10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, mandatory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a growing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commentary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein's pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of publicly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":47159,"journal":{"name":"Australian Educational Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Donna Pendergast,&nbsp;Beryl Exley,&nbsp;Frances Hoyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, mandatory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a growing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commentary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein's pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of publicly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Educational Researcher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Educational Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00635-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚,教学表现评估(TPA)是一个相对较新的强制性障碍,必须在初级师范教育(ITE)课程毕业前完成。这项高风险任务是澳大利亚教学与学校领导学院(AITSL)ITE课程认证文件中列出的标准和问责制度中越来越多的要求之一。我们深入研究了关于更广泛的职前和研究生教师质量委员会的公开评论,特别是TPA。我们借鉴了伯恩斯坦的教育身份,并运用这一理论来探究这一现象。我们使用了一组从2019年8月到2020年5月的十个月时间内公开的传统媒体和社交媒体推文的数据集,来揭示这些公共话语所倡导的焦点、固有偏见和教育身份。文章最后讨论了这些驱动因素对公众对ITE质量感知的影响,以及对更广泛的教学状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public commentary on teacher quality: an analysis of media comment on the teaching performance assessment.

In Australia, the Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) is a relatively new, mandatory hurdle which must be completed just prior to the graduation stage of initial teacher education (ITE) programmes. This high-stakes task is one of a growing number of requirements to come out of the standards and accountability regime as outlined in the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) document for accreditation for ITE programmes. We delve into the public commentary about the broader commission of preservice and graduate teacher quality in general and the TPA in particular. We draw on Bernstein's pedagogic identities and deductively apply this theory to explore this phenomenon. We use a data set of publicly available legacy media and social media tweets made over a ten-month period from August 2019 to May 2020 to reveal the focus, inherent bias and pedagogic identities promoted by these public discourses. The paper concludes with discussion about the implications of these drivers on the public perception of quality in ITE and on the status of teaching more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Educational Researcher
Australian Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Australian Educational Researcher is the international, peer reviewed journal published by AARE. The Australian Educational Researcher is published three times a year and is a Thomson (ISI) indexed journal. The aim of AER is to:Promote understandings of educational issues through the publication of original research and scholarly essays.Inform education policy through the publication of papers utilising a range of research methodologies and addressing issues of theory and practice.Provide a research forum for education researchers to debate current problems and issues.Provide an international and national perspective on education research through the publication of book reviews, scholarly essays, original quantitative and qualitative research and papers that are methodologically or theoretically innovative.AER welcomes contributions from a variety of disciplinary perspectives on any level of education.
期刊最新文献
Researching teachers’ time use: Complexity, challenges and a possible way forward A National Study Exploring Factors Promoting Adolescent College Readiness in Math and Science (STEM-CR) Academic work from the perspectives of aspiring academics: a study of doctoral candidates and recent graduates Wealth-Based Inequalities in Higher Education Attendance: A Global Snapshot Transitional pathways through middle school for First Nations students in the Northern Territory of Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1