研究感知信息效果与实际信息效果之间的纵向关系:随机试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459
Haijing Ma, Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea, Talia Kieu, Jacob A Rohde, Marissa G Hall, Noel T Brewer, Seth M Noar
{"title":"研究感知信息效果与实际信息效果之间的纵向关系:随机试验。","authors":"Haijing Ma, Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea, Talia Kieu, Jacob A Rohde, Marissa G Hall, Noel T Brewer, Seth M Noar","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to examine the relationship between perceived message effectiveness (PME) and actual message effectiveness (AME) in a 3-week randomized trial of vaping prevention advertisements. Participants were US adolescents (<i>n</i> = 1,514) recruited in 2021. We randomly assigned them to view <i>The Real Cost</i> vaping prevention ads or control videos online. Participants viewed three videos at Visit 1, again at Visits 2 and 3, and completed a survey at each visit that assessed AME (susceptibility to vaping) and two types of PME - effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact) and message perceptions (potential for message processing). At Visit 4, AME was measured. Compared to control, <i>The Real Cost</i> ads led to improved AME (lower susceptibility to vaping at Visit 4, <i>p</i> < .001). This was anticipated by <i>The Real Cost</i> ads eliciting higher PME ratings (higher effects and message perceptions at Visit 1, both <i>p</i> < .001). Furthermore, PME (both effects and message perceptions) at Visit 1 predicted susceptibility to vaping at Visits 1, 2, 3, and 4 (all <i>p</i> < .001). Finally, effects perceptions fully mediated the impact of <i>The Real Cost</i> ads on susceptibility to vaping (β = -.30; <i>p</i> < .001), while message perceptions only partially mediated the effect (β = -.04; <i>p</i> = .001). Our findings indicate a relationship between PME and AME, especially effects perceptions, and suggest that PME may be useful in message pre-testing to select messages with greater behavior change potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived and Actual Message Effectiveness: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Haijing Ma, Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea, Talia Kieu, Jacob A Rohde, Marissa G Hall, Noel T Brewer, Seth M Noar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We sought to examine the relationship between perceived message effectiveness (PME) and actual message effectiveness (AME) in a 3-week randomized trial of vaping prevention advertisements. Participants were US adolescents (<i>n</i> = 1,514) recruited in 2021. We randomly assigned them to view <i>The Real Cost</i> vaping prevention ads or control videos online. Participants viewed three videos at Visit 1, again at Visits 2 and 3, and completed a survey at each visit that assessed AME (susceptibility to vaping) and two types of PME - effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact) and message perceptions (potential for message processing). At Visit 4, AME was measured. Compared to control, <i>The Real Cost</i> ads led to improved AME (lower susceptibility to vaping at Visit 4, <i>p</i> < .001). This was anticipated by <i>The Real Cost</i> ads eliciting higher PME ratings (higher effects and message perceptions at Visit 1, both <i>p</i> < .001). Furthermore, PME (both effects and message perceptions) at Visit 1 predicted susceptibility to vaping at Visits 1, 2, 3, and 4 (all <i>p</i> < .001). Finally, effects perceptions fully mediated the impact of <i>The Real Cost</i> ads on susceptibility to vaping (β = -.30; <i>p</i> < .001), while message perceptions only partially mediated the effect (β = -.04; <i>p</i> = .001). Our findings indicate a relationship between PME and AME, especially effects perceptions, and suggest that PME may be useful in message pre-testing to select messages with greater behavior change potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2222459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们试图在一项为期三周的预防吸食电子烟广告随机试验中,研究感知信息有效性(PME)与实际信息有效性(AME)之间的关系。参与者是 2021 年招募的美国青少年(n = 1,514)。我们随机分配他们在线观看 "真实成本"(The Real Cost)吸烟预防广告或对照视频。参与者在访问 1 观看三段视频,在访问 2 和访问 3 再次观看视频,并在每次访问时填写一份调查问卷,评估 AME(对吸食电子烟的易感性)和两种类型的 PME--效果感知(行为影响的潜力)和信息感知(信息处理的潜力)。在第 4 次访问时,对 AME 进行了测量。与对照组相比,"真实成本 "广告改善了 AME(第 4 次访问时对吸烟的易感性较低;第 1 次访问时对效果和信息的感知较高;第 2 次访问时对信息的感知较低;第 3 次访问时对信息的感知较高;第 4 次访问时对信息的感知较低)。我们的研究结果表明了 PME 与 AME 之间的关系,尤其是效果感知,并表明 PME 可能有助于信息预试,以选择具有更大行为改变潜力的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived and Actual Message Effectiveness: A Randomized Trial.

We sought to examine the relationship between perceived message effectiveness (PME) and actual message effectiveness (AME) in a 3-week randomized trial of vaping prevention advertisements. Participants were US adolescents (n = 1,514) recruited in 2021. We randomly assigned them to view The Real Cost vaping prevention ads or control videos online. Participants viewed three videos at Visit 1, again at Visits 2 and 3, and completed a survey at each visit that assessed AME (susceptibility to vaping) and two types of PME - effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact) and message perceptions (potential for message processing). At Visit 4, AME was measured. Compared to control, The Real Cost ads led to improved AME (lower susceptibility to vaping at Visit 4, p < .001). This was anticipated by The Real Cost ads eliciting higher PME ratings (higher effects and message perceptions at Visit 1, both p < .001). Furthermore, PME (both effects and message perceptions) at Visit 1 predicted susceptibility to vaping at Visits 1, 2, 3, and 4 (all p < .001). Finally, effects perceptions fully mediated the impact of The Real Cost ads on susceptibility to vaping (β = -.30; p < .001), while message perceptions only partially mediated the effect (β = -.04; p = .001). Our findings indicate a relationship between PME and AME, especially effects perceptions, and suggest that PME may be useful in message pre-testing to select messages with greater behavior change potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Promoting Resilience and Well-Being of Young Adults with Diabetes Through Digital Storytelling in Arts-Based Research. Has it Really Been 37 Years? The Journey of Health Communication. Narrative Force: How Science and Storytelling Impact Parental Concussion Beliefs and Intentions Through Transportation and Trust. Following Medical Advice of an AI or a Human Doctor? Experimental Evidence Based on Clinician-Patient Communication Pathway Model. COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancies: A Spanish-Language Focus Group Analysis in Texas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1