正常组织毒性预测:临床翻译的前景

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Seminars in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.010
Sarah L. Kerns , William A. Hall MD , Brian Marples PhD , Catharine M.L. West PhD
{"title":"正常组织毒性预测:临床翻译的前景","authors":"Sarah L. Kerns ,&nbsp;William A. Hall MD ,&nbsp;Brian Marples PhD ,&nbsp;Catharine M.L. West PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>Improvements in radiotherapy delivery have enabled higher therapeutic doses and improved efficacy, contributing to the growing number of long-term cancer survivors. These survivors are at risk of developing late toxicity from radiotherapy, and the inability to predict who is most susceptible results in substantial impact on </span>quality of life and limits further </span>curative dose<span> escalation. A predictive assay or algorithm for normal tissue </span></span>radiosensitivity<span><span> would allow more personalized treatment planning, reducing the burden of late toxicity, and improving the </span>therapeutic index. Progress over the last 10 years has shown that the etiology of late clinical radiotoxicity is multifactorial and informs development of predictive models that combine information on treatment (eg, dose, adjuvant treatment), demographic and health behaviors (eg, smoking, age), co-morbidities (eg, diabetes, collagen vascular disease), and biology (eg, genetics, </span></span><span><em>ex vivo</em></span><span> functional assays). AI has emerged as a useful tool and is facilitating extraction of signal from large datasets and development of high-level multivariable models. Some models are progressing to evaluation in clinical trials, and we anticipate adoption of these into the clinical workflow in the coming years. Information on predicted risk of toxicity could prompt modification of radiotherapy delivery (eg, use of protons, altered dose and/or fractionation, reduced volume) or, in rare instances of very high predicted risk, avoidance of radiotherapy. Risk information can also be used to assist treatment decision-making for cancers where efficacy of radiotherapy is equivalent to other treatments (eg, low-risk prostate cancer) and can be used to guide follow-up screening in instances where radiotherapy is still the best choice to maximize tumor control probability. Here, we review promising predictive assays for clinical radiotoxicity and highlight studies that are progressing to develop an evidence base for clinical utility.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal Tissue Toxicity Prediction: Clinical Translation on the Horizon\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L. Kerns ,&nbsp;William A. Hall MD ,&nbsp;Brian Marples PhD ,&nbsp;Catharine M.L. West PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span><span>Improvements in radiotherapy delivery have enabled higher therapeutic doses and improved efficacy, contributing to the growing number of long-term cancer survivors. These survivors are at risk of developing late toxicity from radiotherapy, and the inability to predict who is most susceptible results in substantial impact on </span>quality of life and limits further </span>curative dose<span> escalation. A predictive assay or algorithm for normal tissue </span></span>radiosensitivity<span><span> would allow more personalized treatment planning, reducing the burden of late toxicity, and improving the </span>therapeutic index. Progress over the last 10 years has shown that the etiology of late clinical radiotoxicity is multifactorial and informs development of predictive models that combine information on treatment (eg, dose, adjuvant treatment), demographic and health behaviors (eg, smoking, age), co-morbidities (eg, diabetes, collagen vascular disease), and biology (eg, genetics, </span></span><span><em>ex vivo</em></span><span> functional assays). AI has emerged as a useful tool and is facilitating extraction of signal from large datasets and development of high-level multivariable models. Some models are progressing to evaluation in clinical trials, and we anticipate adoption of these into the clinical workflow in the coming years. Information on predicted risk of toxicity could prompt modification of radiotherapy delivery (eg, use of protons, altered dose and/or fractionation, reduced volume) or, in rare instances of very high predicted risk, avoidance of radiotherapy. Risk information can also be used to assist treatment decision-making for cancers where efficacy of radiotherapy is equivalent to other treatments (eg, low-risk prostate cancer) and can be used to guide follow-up screening in instances where radiotherapy is still the best choice to maximize tumor control probability. Here, we review promising predictive assays for clinical radiotoxicity and highlight studies that are progressing to develop an evidence base for clinical utility.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429623000243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射治疗的改进提高了治疗剂量和疗效,有助于癌症长期幸存者的数量不断增加。这些幸存者有因放射治疗而产生晚期毒性的风险,并且无法预测谁最易感会对生活质量产生重大影响,并限制进一步的治疗剂量增加。正常组织放射敏感性的预测分析或算法将允许更个性化的治疗计划,减少晚期毒性的负担,并提高治疗指数。过去10年的进展表明,晚期临床放射性毒性的病因是多因素的,并为预测模型的开发提供了信息,该模型结合了治疗(如剂量、辅助治疗)、人口统计学和健康行为(如吸烟、年龄)、合并症(如糖尿病、胶原血管病)和生物学(如遗传学、离体功能测定)的信息。人工智能已成为一种有用的工具,有助于从大型数据集中提取信号和开发高级多变量模型。一些模型正在临床试验中进行评估,我们预计在未来几年将其纳入临床工作流程。关于预测毒性风险的信息可能会促使改变放射治疗递送(例如,使用质子、改变剂量和/或分级、减少体积),或者在极少数预测风险非常高的情况下,避免放射治疗。风险信息也可用于辅助癌症的治疗决策,其中放疗的疗效与其他治疗(例如,低风险前列腺癌症)相当,并可用于指导放疗仍然是最大限度提高肿瘤控制概率的最佳选择的情况下的后续筛查。在这里,我们回顾了有前景的临床放射性毒性预测分析,并强调了正在为临床实用性开发证据基础的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normal Tissue Toxicity Prediction: Clinical Translation on the Horizon

Improvements in radiotherapy delivery have enabled higher therapeutic doses and improved efficacy, contributing to the growing number of long-term cancer survivors. These survivors are at risk of developing late toxicity from radiotherapy, and the inability to predict who is most susceptible results in substantial impact on quality of life and limits further curative dose escalation. A predictive assay or algorithm for normal tissue radiosensitivity would allow more personalized treatment planning, reducing the burden of late toxicity, and improving the therapeutic index. Progress over the last 10 years has shown that the etiology of late clinical radiotoxicity is multifactorial and informs development of predictive models that combine information on treatment (eg, dose, adjuvant treatment), demographic and health behaviors (eg, smoking, age), co-morbidities (eg, diabetes, collagen vascular disease), and biology (eg, genetics, ex vivo functional assays). AI has emerged as a useful tool and is facilitating extraction of signal from large datasets and development of high-level multivariable models. Some models are progressing to evaluation in clinical trials, and we anticipate adoption of these into the clinical workflow in the coming years. Information on predicted risk of toxicity could prompt modification of radiotherapy delivery (eg, use of protons, altered dose and/or fractionation, reduced volume) or, in rare instances of very high predicted risk, avoidance of radiotherapy. Risk information can also be used to assist treatment decision-making for cancers where efficacy of radiotherapy is equivalent to other treatments (eg, low-risk prostate cancer) and can be used to guide follow-up screening in instances where radiotherapy is still the best choice to maximize tumor control probability. Here, we review promising predictive assays for clinical radiotoxicity and highlight studies that are progressing to develop an evidence base for clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.
期刊最新文献
Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making Safe Hypofractionation Amid Diverse Technologies: Using Teamwork to Manage the Complexity Advancing the Collaboration Between Imaging and Radiation Oncology Future of Multidisciplinary Team in the Context of Adaptive Therapy Green Horizons in Oncology: A Blueprint for Environmentally Sustainable Radiation Therapy Facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1