Louis A Schmidt, Christina A Brook, Raha Hassan, Taigan MacGowan, Kristie L Poole, Michelle K Jetha
{"title":"iGen还是shyGen?羞怯的代际差异。","authors":"Louis A Schmidt, Christina A Brook, Raha Hassan, Taigan MacGowan, Kristie L Poole, Michelle K Jetha","doi":"10.1177/09567976231163877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (<i>N</i> = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; <i>n</i> = 266, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into <i>prepandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 263, <i>M</i> = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and <i>midpandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 277, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"705-713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iGen or <i>shy</i>Gen? Generational Differences in Shyness.\",\"authors\":\"Louis A Schmidt, Christina A Brook, Raha Hassan, Taigan MacGowan, Kristie L Poole, Michelle K Jetha\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09567976231163877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (<i>N</i> = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; <i>n</i> = 266, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into <i>prepandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 263, <i>M</i> = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and <i>midpandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 277, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"705-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231163877\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231163877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
iGen or shyGen? Generational Differences in Shyness.
Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (N = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; n = 266, Mage = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into prepandemic (n = 263, M = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and midpandemic (n = 277, Mage = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.