放射场设计和同时使用替莫唑胺治疗中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的疗效和毒性。

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npac052
Anna M Laucis, Katherine Selwa, Yilun Sun, Michelle M Kim, Kyle C Cuneo, Theodore S Lawrence, Daniel R Wahl, Larry Junck, Yoshie Umemura
{"title":"放射场设计和同时使用替莫唑胺治疗中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的疗效和毒性。","authors":"Anna M Laucis,&nbsp;Katherine Selwa,&nbsp;Yilun Sun,&nbsp;Michelle M Kim,&nbsp;Kyle C Cuneo,&nbsp;Theodore S Lawrence,&nbsp;Daniel R Wahl,&nbsp;Larry Junck,&nbsp;Yoshie Umemura","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no consensus on the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma refractory to first-line methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is sometimes used but may result in unacceptable neurocognitive dysfunction. We examined the efficacy and toxicities of WBRT with or without concurrent temozolomide in CNS lymphoma treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study included adults with CNS lymphoma who received WBRT, either consolidative low-dose WBRT alone or low-dose WBRT with a focal boost to residual disease and were previously treated with high-dose methotrexate. The relationships between the WBRT regimen, concurrent temozolomide, and clinical outcomes and toxicities were assessed using proportional hazards and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 24-74) treated from 2004 to 2019 were included. In total, 20 patients received concurrent temozolomide. In the WBRT + Boost cohort (<i>n</i> = 32), concurrent temozolomide resulted in better 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) (73% OS and 66% PFS) compared to patients treated without concurrent temozolomide (44% OS and 24% PFS). On multivariate analysis, concurrent temozolomide was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.28, <i>P</i> = .02). There were no significant differences between the two radiation groups or between those treated with or without concurrent temozolomide, with respect to significant acute hematologic, non-hematologic, and long-term neurocognitive toxicities (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy in CNS lymphoma was associated with better PFS and was well tolerated. Low-dose WBRT with a boost is a safe and reasonable treatment approach for focal refractory disease. Prospective research that includes rigorous neurocognitive assessments is now warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"9 6","pages":"536-544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665068/pdf/npac052.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and toxicity with radiation field designs and concurrent temozolomide for CNS lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Anna M Laucis,&nbsp;Katherine Selwa,&nbsp;Yilun Sun,&nbsp;Michelle M Kim,&nbsp;Kyle C Cuneo,&nbsp;Theodore S Lawrence,&nbsp;Daniel R Wahl,&nbsp;Larry Junck,&nbsp;Yoshie Umemura\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npac052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no consensus on the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma refractory to first-line methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is sometimes used but may result in unacceptable neurocognitive dysfunction. We examined the efficacy and toxicities of WBRT with or without concurrent temozolomide in CNS lymphoma treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study included adults with CNS lymphoma who received WBRT, either consolidative low-dose WBRT alone or low-dose WBRT with a focal boost to residual disease and were previously treated with high-dose methotrexate. The relationships between the WBRT regimen, concurrent temozolomide, and clinical outcomes and toxicities were assessed using proportional hazards and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 24-74) treated from 2004 to 2019 were included. In total, 20 patients received concurrent temozolomide. In the WBRT + Boost cohort (<i>n</i> = 32), concurrent temozolomide resulted in better 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) (73% OS and 66% PFS) compared to patients treated without concurrent temozolomide (44% OS and 24% PFS). On multivariate analysis, concurrent temozolomide was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.28, <i>P</i> = .02). There were no significant differences between the two radiation groups or between those treated with or without concurrent temozolomide, with respect to significant acute hematologic, non-hematologic, and long-term neurocognitive toxicities (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy in CNS lymphoma was associated with better PFS and was well tolerated. Low-dose WBRT with a boost is a safe and reasonable treatment approach for focal refractory disease. Prospective research that includes rigorous neurocognitive assessments is now warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"536-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665068/pdf/npac052.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于中枢神经系统(CNS)淋巴瘤一线甲氨蝶呤化疗难治的治疗尚无共识。全脑放疗(WBRT)有时被使用,但可能导致不可接受的神经认知功能障碍。我们检查了WBRT联合或不联合替莫唑胺治疗中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的疗效和毒性。方法:这项经irb批准的单机构回顾性研究纳入了接受WBRT的中枢神经系统淋巴瘤成人患者,这些患者要么单独接受低剂量巩固性WBRT,要么接受低剂量局部增强残余疾病的WBRT,之前接受过高剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗。使用比例风险和逻辑回归模型评估WBRT方案、同时使用替莫唑胺与临床结果和毒性之间的关系。结果:共纳入2004 - 2019年治疗的45例患者,中位年龄64岁(范围24-74)。总共有20名患者同时服用替莫唑胺。在WBRT + Boost队列(n = 32)中,与不同时使用替莫唑胺的患者(44% OS和24% PFS)相比,同时使用替莫唑胺的患者的2年总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS) (73% OS和66% PFS)更好。在多因素分析中,同时使用替莫唑胺与更好的PFS相关(HR 0.28, P = 0.02)。在急性、非血液学和长期神经认知毒性方面,两个放射组之间或同时使用替莫唑胺组与不使用替莫唑胺组之间没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:在这项研究中,替莫唑胺联合放疗治疗中枢神经系统淋巴瘤与更好的PFS相关,并且耐受性良好。小剂量强化WBRT是一种安全合理的治疗局灶性难治性疾病的方法。包括严格的神经认知评估在内的前瞻性研究现在是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and toxicity with radiation field designs and concurrent temozolomide for CNS lymphoma.

Background: There is no consensus on the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma refractory to first-line methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is sometimes used but may result in unacceptable neurocognitive dysfunction. We examined the efficacy and toxicities of WBRT with or without concurrent temozolomide in CNS lymphoma treatment.

Methods: This single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study included adults with CNS lymphoma who received WBRT, either consolidative low-dose WBRT alone or low-dose WBRT with a focal boost to residual disease and were previously treated with high-dose methotrexate. The relationships between the WBRT regimen, concurrent temozolomide, and clinical outcomes and toxicities were assessed using proportional hazards and logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 24-74) treated from 2004 to 2019 were included. In total, 20 patients received concurrent temozolomide. In the WBRT + Boost cohort (n = 32), concurrent temozolomide resulted in better 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) (73% OS and 66% PFS) compared to patients treated without concurrent temozolomide (44% OS and 24% PFS). On multivariate analysis, concurrent temozolomide was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.28, P = .02). There were no significant differences between the two radiation groups or between those treated with or without concurrent temozolomide, with respect to significant acute hematologic, non-hematologic, and long-term neurocognitive toxicities (P > .05).

Conclusions: In this study, concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy in CNS lymphoma was associated with better PFS and was well tolerated. Low-dose WBRT with a boost is a safe and reasonable treatment approach for focal refractory disease. Prospective research that includes rigorous neurocognitive assessments is now warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Reviewer List for the year 2024. Should we be testing for germline and "actionable" mutations in all glioma patients? Foreword. Role of the tumor board when prescribing mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors to patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1