手和腕截肢:利用全国住院病人样本进行的人口统计学分析。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1177/15589447231167583
Stephen A Stearns, Allan A Weidman, Toni F Engmann, Lauren Valentine, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Jose Foppiani, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi
{"title":"手和腕截肢:利用全国住院病人样本进行的人口统计学分析。","authors":"Stephen A Stearns, Allan A Weidman, Toni F Engmann, Lauren Valentine, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Jose Foppiani, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi","doi":"10.1177/15589447231167583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision</i> codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods (<i>P</i> = .0188) and paid significantly more (<i>P</i> = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand and Wrist Amputation: A Demographic Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen A Stearns, Allan A Weidman, Toni F Engmann, Lauren Valentine, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Jose Foppiani, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447231167583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision</i> codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods (<i>P</i> = .0188) and paid significantly more (<i>P</i> = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481078/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231167583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231167583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外伤性手部和腕部截肢是一种罕见的致残性损伤。手部再植手术为翻修手术提供了一种独特的替代方法,但需要适当获取必要的医疗资源。本研究旨在了解全国创伤性手部截肢再植的实践情况,并确定在获得手术治疗方面是否存在差异:方法:使用《国际疾病分类》第 10 次修订版中有关再植和翻修截肢手术的代码,从全国住院病人样本中收集 2016 年至 2019 年的数据。对人口统计学、医院和结果变量进行了汇总统计,并对再植和翻修率的影响进行了子分析:确定了 72 名患者。患者平均年龄为 35 岁,男性占绝大多数(90%)。队列中的种族分布大致反映了美国人口的种族比例。15名患者(21%)接受了再植手术。这一比例在性别、种族和收入阶层之间相似。手部再植手术主要在大床位(87%)、非营利性私立医院(73%)和城市教学医院(94%)进行。这些患者最常见的保险状况是私人保险,其次是医疗补助、医疗保险和自费保险。47名患者接受了翻修截肢手术(65%),与人口统计学特征之间没有关联。这些患者的住院时间明显更长(P = .0188),如果接受了翻修截肢手术,支付的费用也明显更高(P = .0014)。患者最常出院回家(65%),其次是专业护理机构(18%):本研究描述了手部截肢管理的现状,没有发现社会人口因素影响手术护理的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hand and Wrist Amputation: A Demographic Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment.

Methods: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates.

Results: Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods (P = .0188) and paid significantly more (P = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%).

Conclusion: This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Early and Late Intrinsic Hand Muscle Reinnervation After End-to-Side AIN to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer. Generic Volar Locking Plate Use in Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes and Cost Reduction. Infections and Patient Satisfaction in WALANT Hand Surgery in a Hospital Procedure Room. Management Options and Clinical Outcomes After Flexor Tendon Ruptures Following Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures. Decreased Complication Rate Using Partially Threaded Compared With Fully Threaded Compression Screws in 4 Corner Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1