癫痫发作导致的精神错乱和预防措施。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatria polska Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154806
Przemysław Cynkier
{"title":"癫痫发作导致的精神错乱和预防措施。","authors":"Przemysław Cynkier","doi":"10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The analysis covers the case of a driver suffering from epilepsy for many years, who during an epileptic seizure, in a state of profound disturbance of consciousness, caused a road accident. Such situations usually result in the perpetrator being considered insane in relation to the allegation. The task of expert psychiatrists and psychologists is then to assess the likelihood of the perpetrator of the prohibited act repeating it, and to indicate to the court the optimal therapeutic precautionary or penal measure. These legal solutions also apply to perpetrators who were considered insane due to disturbances of consciousness occurring in the course of various somatic diseases, and not permanent mental disorders. Currently, there are no grounds for appointing expert neurologists, diabetologists, cardiologists, pulmonologists, and other specialists who would assess the legitimacy of taking precautionary measures, which may raise judicial doubts. Moreover, applying in such cases only the measures indicated in Article 93a § 1 of the Penal Code does not find any psychiatric and psychological justification. Consideration should be given to extending the catalog of protective measures to include the therapy of various somatic diseases in order to minimize the risk of developing deep mental disorders in the future. The work proposes new opinion-making solutions, which, however, requires changes in legal regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20863,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria polska","volume":" ","pages":"303-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insanity as a consequence of an epileptic seizure and precautionary measures.\",\"authors\":\"Przemysław Cynkier\",\"doi\":\"10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The analysis covers the case of a driver suffering from epilepsy for many years, who during an epileptic seizure, in a state of profound disturbance of consciousness, caused a road accident. Such situations usually result in the perpetrator being considered insane in relation to the allegation. The task of expert psychiatrists and psychologists is then to assess the likelihood of the perpetrator of the prohibited act repeating it, and to indicate to the court the optimal therapeutic precautionary or penal measure. These legal solutions also apply to perpetrators who were considered insane due to disturbances of consciousness occurring in the course of various somatic diseases, and not permanent mental disorders. Currently, there are no grounds for appointing expert neurologists, diabetologists, cardiologists, pulmonologists, and other specialists who would assess the legitimacy of taking precautionary measures, which may raise judicial doubts. Moreover, applying in such cases only the measures indicated in Article 93a § 1 of the Penal Code does not find any psychiatric and psychological justification. Consideration should be given to extending the catalog of protective measures to include the therapy of various somatic diseases in order to minimize the risk of developing deep mental disorders in the future. The work proposes new opinion-making solutions, which, however, requires changes in legal regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"303-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154806\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析涉及一名患有多年癫痫病的司机,他在癫痫发作时意识极度混乱,导致了一起交通事故。这种情况通常会导致肇事者被视为与指控有关的精神病患者。精神病学专家和心理学家的任务是评估违禁行为实施者再次实施该行为的可能性,并向法院指出最佳的治疗预防或刑事措施。这些法律解决方案也适用于因各种躯体疾病而非永久性精神障碍导致的意识障碍而被视为精神失常的犯罪人。目前,没有理由任命神经科专家、糖尿病专家、心脏病专家、肺病专家和其他专家来评估采取预防措施的合法性,这可能会引起司法质疑。此外,在此类案件中仅适用《刑法典》第 93a 条第 1 款规定的措施在精神病学和心理学上是站不住脚的。应考虑扩大保护措施的范围,将各种躯体疾病的治疗也包括在内,以最大限度地降低将来患上深度精神障碍的风险。这项工作提出了新的舆论解决方案,但这需要修改法律法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insanity as a consequence of an epileptic seizure and precautionary measures.

The analysis covers the case of a driver suffering from epilepsy for many years, who during an epileptic seizure, in a state of profound disturbance of consciousness, caused a road accident. Such situations usually result in the perpetrator being considered insane in relation to the allegation. The task of expert psychiatrists and psychologists is then to assess the likelihood of the perpetrator of the prohibited act repeating it, and to indicate to the court the optimal therapeutic precautionary or penal measure. These legal solutions also apply to perpetrators who were considered insane due to disturbances of consciousness occurring in the course of various somatic diseases, and not permanent mental disorders. Currently, there are no grounds for appointing expert neurologists, diabetologists, cardiologists, pulmonologists, and other specialists who would assess the legitimacy of taking precautionary measures, which may raise judicial doubts. Moreover, applying in such cases only the measures indicated in Article 93a § 1 of the Penal Code does not find any psychiatric and psychological justification. Consideration should be given to extending the catalog of protective measures to include the therapy of various somatic diseases in order to minimize the risk of developing deep mental disorders in the future. The work proposes new opinion-making solutions, which, however, requires changes in legal regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria polska
Psychiatria polska 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Study directions and development of cognitive theory of depression. Prevalence and determinants of psychotropic medication use in Poland. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of delirium. An outline of savant syndrome. Use of the opioid receptor antagonist - naltrexone in the treatment of non-suicidal self-injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1