临床医生和65岁及以上老年人在使用预期寿命来告知癌症筛查方面的感知障碍:叙述回顾和比较。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-18 DOI:10.1177/10775587231153269
Laura E Brotzman, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
{"title":"临床医生和65岁及以上老年人在使用预期寿命来告知癌症筛查方面的感知障碍:叙述回顾和比较。","authors":"Laura E Brotzman, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher","doi":"10.1177/10775587231153269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While cancer screening guidelines increasingly recommend incorporating life expectancy estimates to inform screening decisions for older adults, little is known about how this happens in practice. This review summarizes current knowledge about primary care clinician and older adult (65+) perspectives about use of life expectancy to guide cancer screening decisions. Clinicians report operational barriers, uncertainty, and hesitation around use of life expectancy in screening decisions. They recognize it may help them more accurately weigh benefits and harms but are unsure how to estimate life expectancy for individual patients. Older adults face conceptual barriers and are generally unconvinced of the benefits of considering their life expectancy when making screening decisions. Life expectancy will always be a difficult topic for clinicians and patients, but there are advantages to incorporating it in cancer screening decisions. We highlight key takeaways from both clinician and older adult perspectives to guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 4","pages":"372-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Laura E Brotzman, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587231153269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While cancer screening guidelines increasingly recommend incorporating life expectancy estimates to inform screening decisions for older adults, little is known about how this happens in practice. This review summarizes current knowledge about primary care clinician and older adult (65+) perspectives about use of life expectancy to guide cancer screening decisions. Clinicians report operational barriers, uncertainty, and hesitation around use of life expectancy in screening decisions. They recognize it may help them more accurately weigh benefits and harms but are unsure how to estimate life expectancy for individual patients. Older adults face conceptual barriers and are generally unconvinced of the benefits of considering their life expectancy when making screening decisions. Life expectancy will always be a difficult topic for clinicians and patients, but there are advantages to incorporating it in cancer screening decisions. We highlight key takeaways from both clinician and older adult perspectives to guide future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"372-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231153269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231153269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然癌症筛查指南越来越多地建议将预期寿命估算纳入老年人的筛查决策,但人们对这在实践中是如何发生的知之甚少。这篇综述总结了目前初级保健临床医生和老年人(65岁以上)关于使用预期寿命指导癌症筛查决策的观点。临床医生报告了在筛查决策中使用预期寿命的操作障碍、不确定性和犹豫。他们认识到,这可能有助于他们更准确地权衡利弊,但不确定如何估计个体患者的预期寿命。老年人面临着观念上的障碍,通常不相信在做筛查决定时考虑他们的预期寿命有什么好处。对于临床医生和患者来说,预期寿命一直是一个困难的话题,但将其纳入癌症筛查决策是有好处的。我们强调了临床医生和老年人观点的关键要点,以指导未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.

While cancer screening guidelines increasingly recommend incorporating life expectancy estimates to inform screening decisions for older adults, little is known about how this happens in practice. This review summarizes current knowledge about primary care clinician and older adult (65+) perspectives about use of life expectancy to guide cancer screening decisions. Clinicians report operational barriers, uncertainty, and hesitation around use of life expectancy in screening decisions. They recognize it may help them more accurately weigh benefits and harms but are unsure how to estimate life expectancy for individual patients. Older adults face conceptual barriers and are generally unconvinced of the benefits of considering their life expectancy when making screening decisions. Life expectancy will always be a difficult topic for clinicians and patients, but there are advantages to incorporating it in cancer screening decisions. We highlight key takeaways from both clinician and older adult perspectives to guide future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Policy and Payment Decisions on Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States: A Review. Association Between Self-Direction and Personal Care Aide Wages. Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program. Health Care Use of ACA Marketplace Enrollees During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Changes in Patient Care Experiences and the Nurse Work Environment: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1