Youness Arjoune, Trong N Nguyen, Robin W Doroshow, Raj Shekhar
{"title":"数字听诊器的技术特征:面向可扩展的基于人工智能的听诊。","authors":"Youness Arjoune, Trong N Nguyen, Robin W Doroshow, Raj Shekhar","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2023.2174198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital stethoscopes can enable the development of integrated artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can remove the subjectivity of manual auscultation, improve diagnostic accuracy, and compensate for diminishing auscultatory skills. Developing scalable AI systems can be challenging, especially when acquisition devices differ and thus introduce sensor bias. To address this issue, a precise knowledge of these differences, i.e., frequency responses of these devices, is needed, but the manufacturers often do not provide complete device specifications. In this study, we reported an effective methodology for determining the frequency response of a digital stethoscope and used it to characterise three common digital stethoscopes: Littmann 3200, Eko Core, and Thinklabs One. Our results show significant inter-device variability in that the frequency responses of the three studied stethoscopes were distinctly different. A moderate intra-device variability was seen when comparing two separate units of Littmann 3200. The study highlights the need for normalisation across devices for developing successful AI-assisted auscultation and provides a technical characterisation approach as a first step to accomplish it.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical characterisation of digital stethoscopes: towards scalable artificial intelligence-based auscultation.\",\"authors\":\"Youness Arjoune, Trong N Nguyen, Robin W Doroshow, Raj Shekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03091902.2023.2174198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Digital stethoscopes can enable the development of integrated artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can remove the subjectivity of manual auscultation, improve diagnostic accuracy, and compensate for diminishing auscultatory skills. Developing scalable AI systems can be challenging, especially when acquisition devices differ and thus introduce sensor bias. To address this issue, a precise knowledge of these differences, i.e., frequency responses of these devices, is needed, but the manufacturers often do not provide complete device specifications. In this study, we reported an effective methodology for determining the frequency response of a digital stethoscope and used it to characterise three common digital stethoscopes: Littmann 3200, Eko Core, and Thinklabs One. Our results show significant inter-device variability in that the frequency responses of the three studied stethoscopes were distinctly different. A moderate intra-device variability was seen when comparing two separate units of Littmann 3200. The study highlights the need for normalisation across devices for developing successful AI-assisted auscultation and provides a technical characterisation approach as a first step to accomplish it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2023.2174198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2023.2174198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technical characterisation of digital stethoscopes: towards scalable artificial intelligence-based auscultation.
Digital stethoscopes can enable the development of integrated artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can remove the subjectivity of manual auscultation, improve diagnostic accuracy, and compensate for diminishing auscultatory skills. Developing scalable AI systems can be challenging, especially when acquisition devices differ and thus introduce sensor bias. To address this issue, a precise knowledge of these differences, i.e., frequency responses of these devices, is needed, but the manufacturers often do not provide complete device specifications. In this study, we reported an effective methodology for determining the frequency response of a digital stethoscope and used it to characterise three common digital stethoscopes: Littmann 3200, Eko Core, and Thinklabs One. Our results show significant inter-device variability in that the frequency responses of the three studied stethoscopes were distinctly different. A moderate intra-device variability was seen when comparing two separate units of Littmann 3200. The study highlights the need for normalisation across devices for developing successful AI-assisted auscultation and provides a technical characterisation approach as a first step to accomplish it.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.