Gurpal Bisra, Brigette Rabel, Nick van der Westhuizen
{"title":"利用病理综合报告数据为病理学家和外科医生创建个人仪表板。","authors":"Gurpal Bisra, Brigette Rabel, Nick van der Westhuizen","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Electronic synoptic pathology reporting using xPert from mTuitive is available to all pathologists in British Columbia, Canada. Comparative feedback reports for pathologists and surgeons were created by using the synoptic reporting software.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To use data stored in a single central data repository to provide nonpunitive confidential comparative feedback reports (dashboards) to individual pathologists and surgeons for reflection on their practice and to use aggregate data for quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Integration of mTuitive middleware in 5 different laboratory information systems to have 1 software solution (xPert) sending discrete data elements to the central data repository was performed. Microsoft Office products were used to build comparative feedback reports and made the infrastructure sustainable. Two different types of reports were developed: individual confidential feedback reports (dashboards) and aggregated data reports.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Pathologists have access to an individual confidential live feedback report for the 5 major cancer sites. Surgeons get an annual confidential emailed PDF report. Several quality improvement initiatives were identified from the aggregate data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>We present 2 novel dashboards: a live pathologist dashboard and a static surgeon dashboard. Individual confidential dashboards incentivize use of nonmandated electronic synoptic pathology reporting tools and have increased adoption rates. Use of dashboards has also led to discussions about how patient care may be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Pathology Synoptic Reporting Data to Create Individual Dashboards for Pathologists and Surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Gurpal Bisra, Brigette Rabel, Nick van der Westhuizen\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Electronic synoptic pathology reporting using xPert from mTuitive is available to all pathologists in British Columbia, Canada. Comparative feedback reports for pathologists and surgeons were created by using the synoptic reporting software.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To use data stored in a single central data repository to provide nonpunitive confidential comparative feedback reports (dashboards) to individual pathologists and surgeons for reflection on their practice and to use aggregate data for quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Integration of mTuitive middleware in 5 different laboratory information systems to have 1 software solution (xPert) sending discrete data elements to the central data repository was performed. Microsoft Office products were used to build comparative feedback reports and made the infrastructure sustainable. Two different types of reports were developed: individual confidential feedback reports (dashboards) and aggregated data reports.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Pathologists have access to an individual confidential live feedback report for the 5 major cancer sites. Surgeons get an annual confidential emailed PDF report. Several quality improvement initiatives were identified from the aggregate data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>We present 2 novel dashboards: a live pathologist dashboard and a static surgeon dashboard. Individual confidential dashboards incentivize use of nonmandated electronic synoptic pathology reporting tools and have increased adoption rates. Use of dashboards has also led to discussions about how patient care may be improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"190-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0542-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Pathology Synoptic Reporting Data to Create Individual Dashboards for Pathologists and Surgeons.
Context.—: Electronic synoptic pathology reporting using xPert from mTuitive is available to all pathologists in British Columbia, Canada. Comparative feedback reports for pathologists and surgeons were created by using the synoptic reporting software.
Objective.—: To use data stored in a single central data repository to provide nonpunitive confidential comparative feedback reports (dashboards) to individual pathologists and surgeons for reflection on their practice and to use aggregate data for quality improvement initiatives.
Design.—: Integration of mTuitive middleware in 5 different laboratory information systems to have 1 software solution (xPert) sending discrete data elements to the central data repository was performed. Microsoft Office products were used to build comparative feedback reports and made the infrastructure sustainable. Two different types of reports were developed: individual confidential feedback reports (dashboards) and aggregated data reports.
Results.—: Pathologists have access to an individual confidential live feedback report for the 5 major cancer sites. Surgeons get an annual confidential emailed PDF report. Several quality improvement initiatives were identified from the aggregate data.
Conclusions.—: We present 2 novel dashboards: a live pathologist dashboard and a static surgeon dashboard. Individual confidential dashboards incentivize use of nonmandated electronic synoptic pathology reporting tools and have increased adoption rates. Use of dashboards has also led to discussions about how patient care may be improved.
期刊介绍:
Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals.
Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.