使用机器学习诊断躯体症状障碍:生物标志物对诊断有益吗?

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Biological Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853
Chi-Shin Wu, Shih-Cheng Liao, Wei-Lieh Huang
{"title":"使用机器学习诊断躯体症状障碍:生物标志物对诊断有益吗?","authors":"Chi-Shin Wu,&nbsp;Shih-Cheng Liao,&nbsp;Wei-Lieh Huang","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of machine learning to diagnose somatic symptom disorder: Are the biomarkers beneficial for the diagnosis?\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Shin Wu,&nbsp;Shih-Cheng Liao,&nbsp;Wei-Lieh Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:我们使用机器学习纳入三种类型的生物标志物(呼吸性窦性心律失常,RSA;皮肤电导,SC;手指温度(FT)用于检测躯体症状障碍(SSD)的诊断性能。方法:我们招募了97名SSD受试者和96名无精神病史和躯体困扰的对照组。在三种情况下(静息状态、认知任务下和呼吸节奏不足)记录RSA、SC和FT的值,并对两种人群进行比较。我们利用机器学习将生物信号结合起来,然后运用受者工作特征曲线分析,在不同的指标和情况下检验诊断SSD的性能。对无抑郁/焦虑的受试者进行亚组分析。结果:SSD患者与对照组的FT差异有统计学意义,静息状态和低节奏呼吸时差异更大。然而,生物标记(0.75-0.76)并没有显示与心理问卷(0.86)相当的曲线下面积(AUC)。综合生物学指标和心理指标,得到较高的AUC(0.86 ~ 0.92)。当排除抑郁/焦虑个体时,结合三种生物标志物(0.79-0.83)和采用心理问卷(0.78)显示相似的AUC。结论:RSA/SC/FT在诊断SSD方面的表现不理想,但在排除抑郁/焦虑合并症时具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of machine learning to diagnose somatic symptom disorder: Are the biomarkers beneficial for the diagnosis?

Objectives: We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).

Methods: We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.

Results: FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.

Conclusions: The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and suicide risk in an Indian ancestral population: A case-control study. Correlations between alterations in global brain functional connectivity in patients with major depressive disorder and their genetic characteristics. Morphological correlates of anxiety-related experiences during a ketamine infusion. Weekly transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) maintenance: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1