{"title":"使用机器学习诊断躯体症状障碍:生物标志物对诊断有益吗?","authors":"Chi-Shin Wu, Shih-Cheng Liao, Wei-Lieh Huang","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of machine learning to diagnose somatic symptom disorder: Are the biomarkers beneficial for the diagnosis?\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Shin Wu, Shih-Cheng Liao, Wei-Lieh Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2149853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of machine learning to diagnose somatic symptom disorder: Are the biomarkers beneficial for the diagnosis?
Objectives: We used machine learning to incorporate three types of biomarkers (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA; skin conductance, SC; finger temperature, FT) for examining the performance of diagnosing somatic symptom disorder (SSD).
Methods: We recruited 97 SSD subjects and 96 controls without psychiatric history or somatic distress. The values of RSA, SC and FT were recorded in three situations (resting state, under a cognitive task and under paced breathing) and compared for the two populations. We used machine learning to combine the biological signals and then applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to examine the performance of diagnosing SSD regarding the distinct indicators and situations. Subgroup analysis for subjects without depression/anxiety was also conducted.
Results: FT was significantly different between SSD patients and controls, especially in the resting state and under paced breathing. However, the biomarkers (0.75-0.76) did not reveal an area under the curve (AUC) comparable with the psychological questionnaires (0.86). Combining the biological and psychological indicators gave a high AUC (0.86-0.92). When excluding individuals with depression/anxiety, combining three biomarkers (0.79-0.83) and adopting psychological questionnaires (0.78) revealed a similar AUC.
Conclusions: The performance of RSA/SC/FT was unsatisfactory for diagnosing SSD but became comparable when excluding comorbid depression/anxiety.
期刊介绍:
The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers.
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.