成人ADHD在自然环境下的长期治疗:损耗、药物选择、改善和反应的临床预测因素。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Biological Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/15622975.2023.2168750
Giulio Emilio Brancati, Francesco De Dominicis, Alessandra Petrucci, Alessandro Pallucchini, Marco Carli, Pierpaolo Medda, Elisa Schiavi, Pietro De Rossi, Stefano Vicari, Giulio Perugi
{"title":"成人ADHD在自然环境下的长期治疗:损耗、药物选择、改善和反应的临床预测因素。","authors":"Giulio Emilio Brancati,&nbsp;Francesco De Dominicis,&nbsp;Alessandra Petrucci,&nbsp;Alessandro Pallucchini,&nbsp;Marco Carli,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Medda,&nbsp;Elisa Schiavi,&nbsp;Pietro De Rossi,&nbsp;Stefano Vicari,&nbsp;Giulio Perugi","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2023.2168750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify clinical predictors of treatment attrition, medication choice, improvement and response to pharmacotherapy in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>150 ADHD patients were enrolled and naturalistically followed-up for at least 4 months. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Observer: Screening Version (CAARS-O:SV) were used to measure ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 subjects (38.7%) were lost at follow-up, while 75 (50%) completed follow-up assessment, on average after 26.05 ± 11.99 weeks; 35 were treated with atomoxetine (ATX) and 40 with methylphenidate (MPH). Treatments were moderately effective (<i>d</i> = 0.72) and 37 patients (49.3%) were responders (≥30% CAARS-O:SV decrease). Patients lost at follow-up had lower inattentive symptoms, less generalised anxiety and family history of bipolar disorder, more amphetamine use disorder than follow-up completers. Compared to ATX-treated subjects, MPH-treated patients had greater severity of hyperactivity/impulsivity and were more frequently diagnosed with alcohol use disorder. While MPH and ATX showed similar efficacy, more pronounced improvements were observed in patients with combined ADHD, anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD severity and comorbid substance use positively predicted response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus-based hierarchical treatment of ADHD comorbidity is not consistently supported. Comorbid anxiety, mood and substance use disorders should not discourage the treatment of adult ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"24 6","pages":"523-538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term treatment of adult ADHD in a naturalistic setting: Clinical predictors of attrition, medication choice, improvement, and response.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Emilio Brancati,&nbsp;Francesco De Dominicis,&nbsp;Alessandra Petrucci,&nbsp;Alessandro Pallucchini,&nbsp;Marco Carli,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Medda,&nbsp;Elisa Schiavi,&nbsp;Pietro De Rossi,&nbsp;Stefano Vicari,&nbsp;Giulio Perugi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2023.2168750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify clinical predictors of treatment attrition, medication choice, improvement and response to pharmacotherapy in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>150 ADHD patients were enrolled and naturalistically followed-up for at least 4 months. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Observer: Screening Version (CAARS-O:SV) were used to measure ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 subjects (38.7%) were lost at follow-up, while 75 (50%) completed follow-up assessment, on average after 26.05 ± 11.99 weeks; 35 were treated with atomoxetine (ATX) and 40 with methylphenidate (MPH). Treatments were moderately effective (<i>d</i> = 0.72) and 37 patients (49.3%) were responders (≥30% CAARS-O:SV decrease). Patients lost at follow-up had lower inattentive symptoms, less generalised anxiety and family history of bipolar disorder, more amphetamine use disorder than follow-up completers. Compared to ATX-treated subjects, MPH-treated patients had greater severity of hyperactivity/impulsivity and were more frequently diagnosed with alcohol use disorder. While MPH and ATX showed similar efficacy, more pronounced improvements were observed in patients with combined ADHD, anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD severity and comorbid substance use positively predicted response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consensus-based hierarchical treatment of ADHD comorbidity is not consistently supported. Comorbid anxiety, mood and substance use disorders should not discourage the treatment of adult ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"523-538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2023.2168750\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2023.2168750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)治疗损耗、药物选择、改善和药物治疗反应的临床预测因素。方法:选取150例ADHD患者,进行至少4个月的自然随访。采用Conners' s成人ADHD评定量表-观察者:筛选版(CAARS-O:SV)测量ADHD严重程度。结果:随访中丢失58例(38.7%),完成随访评估75例(50%),平均随访时间为26.05±11.99周;35例用托莫西汀(ATX)治疗,40例用哌甲酯(MPH)治疗。治疗效果中等(d = 0.72), 37例(49.3%)患者有应答(CAARS-O:SV降低≥30%)。与随访完成者相比,随访失败的患者注意力不集中症状较低,广泛性焦虑和双相情感障碍家族史较少,安非他明使用障碍较多。与atx治疗的受试者相比,mph治疗的患者有更严重的多动/冲动,更频繁地被诊断为酒精使用障碍。虽然MPH和ATX表现出相似的疗效,但在合并ADHD、焦虑和物质使用障碍的患者中观察到更明显的改善。ADHD严重程度和共病物质使用正预测反应。结论:基于共识的ADHD合并症分级治疗并没有得到一致的支持。合并症焦虑、情绪和物质使用障碍不应阻碍成人多动症的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term treatment of adult ADHD in a naturalistic setting: Clinical predictors of attrition, medication choice, improvement, and response.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify clinical predictors of treatment attrition, medication choice, improvement and response to pharmacotherapy in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Methods: 150 ADHD patients were enrolled and naturalistically followed-up for at least 4 months. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Observer: Screening Version (CAARS-O:SV) were used to measure ADHD severity.

Results: 58 subjects (38.7%) were lost at follow-up, while 75 (50%) completed follow-up assessment, on average after 26.05 ± 11.99 weeks; 35 were treated with atomoxetine (ATX) and 40 with methylphenidate (MPH). Treatments were moderately effective (d = 0.72) and 37 patients (49.3%) were responders (≥30% CAARS-O:SV decrease). Patients lost at follow-up had lower inattentive symptoms, less generalised anxiety and family history of bipolar disorder, more amphetamine use disorder than follow-up completers. Compared to ATX-treated subjects, MPH-treated patients had greater severity of hyperactivity/impulsivity and were more frequently diagnosed with alcohol use disorder. While MPH and ATX showed similar efficacy, more pronounced improvements were observed in patients with combined ADHD, anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD severity and comorbid substance use positively predicted response.

Conclusions: Consensus-based hierarchical treatment of ADHD comorbidity is not consistently supported. Comorbid anxiety, mood and substance use disorders should not discourage the treatment of adult ADHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
期刊最新文献
Clinical predictors of standard and accelerated theta burst rTMS treatment response in depression: an analysis from a multicentre RCT. Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 is safe and effective in the treatment of mild dementia - a meta-analysis of patient subgroups in randomised controlled trials. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in morphine-addicted rodents under different exercise protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis. An ALE meta-analysis of the neural evidence of facial emotion processing in autism. How difficult is to study the relationship between insomnia, circadian rhythms, inflammation and suicide attempt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1