Jesse Dawson, Navzer D Engineer, Steven C Cramer, Steven L Wolf, Rushna Ali, Michael W O'Dell, David Pierce, Cecília N Prudente, Jessica Redgrave, Wuwei Feng, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Benjamin L Brown, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Louis DeMark, Vibor Krishna, Steven A Kautz, Arshad Majid, Brent Tarver, Duncan L Turner, Teresa J Kimberley
{"title":"迷走神经刺激配合康复治疗慢性缺血性卒中后上肢运动损伤和功能:随机、盲法、关键、vns -康复装置试验的亚组分析","authors":"Jesse Dawson, Navzer D Engineer, Steven C Cramer, Steven L Wolf, Rushna Ali, Michael W O'Dell, David Pierce, Cecília N Prudente, Jessica Redgrave, Wuwei Feng, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Benjamin L Brown, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Louis DeMark, Vibor Krishna, Steven A Kautz, Arshad Majid, Brent Tarver, Duncan L Turner, Teresa J Kimberley","doi":"10.1177/15459683221129274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improved upper extremity impairment and function in a recent pivotal, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial in people with chronic arm weakness after stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine whether treatment effects varied across candidate subgroups, such as younger age or less injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of 6-weeks in-clinic therapy. We explored the effect of VNS treatment by sex, age (≥62 years), time from stroke (>2 years), severity (baseline FMA-UE score >34), paretic side of body, country of enrollment (USA vs UK) and presence of cortical involvement of the index infarction. We assessed whether there was any interaction with treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The primary outcome increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (<i>P</i> = .001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03-4.2). The between group difference was similar across all subgroups and there were no significant treatment interactions. There was no important difference in rates of adverse events across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The response was similar across subgroups examined. The findings suggest that the effects of paired VNS observed in the VNS-REHAB trial are likely to be consistent in wide range of stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 6","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097830/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Impairment and Function After Chronic Ischemic Stroke: Subgroup Analysis of the Randomized, Blinded, Pivotal, VNS-REHAB Device Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jesse Dawson, Navzer D Engineer, Steven C Cramer, Steven L Wolf, Rushna Ali, Michael W O'Dell, David Pierce, Cecília N Prudente, Jessica Redgrave, Wuwei Feng, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Benjamin L Brown, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Louis DeMark, Vibor Krishna, Steven A Kautz, Arshad Majid, Brent Tarver, Duncan L Turner, Teresa J Kimberley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221129274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improved upper extremity impairment and function in a recent pivotal, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial in people with chronic arm weakness after stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine whether treatment effects varied across candidate subgroups, such as younger age or less injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of 6-weeks in-clinic therapy. We explored the effect of VNS treatment by sex, age (≥62 years), time from stroke (>2 years), severity (baseline FMA-UE score >34), paretic side of body, country of enrollment (USA vs UK) and presence of cortical involvement of the index infarction. We assessed whether there was any interaction with treatment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The primary outcome increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (<i>P</i> = .001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03-4.2). The between group difference was similar across all subgroups and there were no significant treatment interactions. There was no important difference in rates of adverse events across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The response was similar across subgroups examined. The findings suggest that the effects of paired VNS observed in the VNS-REHAB trial are likely to be consistent in wide range of stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"367-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221129274\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221129274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:在最近的一项关键、随机、三盲、假对照试验中,迷走神经刺激(VNS)与康复治疗相结合,改善了中风后慢性手臂无力患者的上肢损伤和功能。目的:我们的目的是确定治疗效果是否在候选亚组中有所不同,如年龄较小或损伤较小。方法:参与者被随机分为两组,一组是康复配合主动VNS,另一组是康复配合假刺激(对照组)。主要结果是在完成6周临床治疗后第一天通过Fugl-Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UE)评分测量的损伤变化。我们根据性别、年龄(≥62岁)、卒中时间(>2年)、严重程度(基线FMA-UE评分>34)、身体的双亲侧、入组国家(美国vs英国)和是否存在皮层累及指数梗死来探讨VNS治疗的效果。我们评估了是否与治疗有相互作用。结果:VNS组的主要转归提高5.0分(SD 4.4),对照组的主要转归提高2.4分(SD 3.8) (P =。0.001,组间差异2.6,95% CI 1.03-4.2)。各组之间的差异在所有亚组中相似,并且没有显著的治疗相互作用。亚组间不良事件发生率无显著差异。结论:亚组间的反应相似。研究结果表明,在VNS-康复试验中观察到的配对VNS的效果可能在中重度上肢损伤的中风幸存者中广泛一致。
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Impairment and Function After Chronic Ischemic Stroke: Subgroup Analysis of the Randomized, Blinded, Pivotal, VNS-REHAB Device Trial.
Background: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improved upper extremity impairment and function in a recent pivotal, randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial in people with chronic arm weakness after stroke.
Objective: We aimed to determine whether treatment effects varied across candidate subgroups, such as younger age or less injury.
Methods: Participants were randomized to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of 6-weeks in-clinic therapy. We explored the effect of VNS treatment by sex, age (≥62 years), time from stroke (>2 years), severity (baseline FMA-UE score >34), paretic side of body, country of enrollment (USA vs UK) and presence of cortical involvement of the index infarction. We assessed whether there was any interaction with treatment.
Findings: The primary outcome increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (P = .001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03-4.2). The between group difference was similar across all subgroups and there were no significant treatment interactions. There was no important difference in rates of adverse events across subgroups.
Conclusion: The response was similar across subgroups examined. The findings suggest that the effects of paired VNS observed in the VNS-REHAB trial are likely to be consistent in wide range of stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity impairment.
期刊介绍:
Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.