美国 1988 年临床实验室改进修正案》(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Certificate of Accreditation and Certificate of Compliance Laboratories)中检测人员数量和检测量的估算。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5858/arpa.2022-0345-OA
Yang Xia, Thomas H Taylor, Jufu Chen, Jason Hsia
{"title":"美国 1988 年临床实验室改进修正案》(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Certificate of Accreditation and Certificate of Compliance Laboratories)中检测人员数量和检测量的估算。","authors":"Yang Xia, Thomas H Taylor, Jufu Chen, Jason Hsia","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0345-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Two major categories of laboratories performing nonwaived testing under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) are the Certificate of Accreditation (CoA) and Certificate of Compliance (CoC) laboratories. Accreditation organizations collect more detailed laboratory personnel information than the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES).</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To estimate total numbers of testing personnel and testing volumes in CoA and CoC laboratories, by laboratory type and state.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We developed a statistical inference method by using the respective correlations between testing personnel counts and test volume by laboratory type.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>QIES reported 33 033 active CoA and CoC laboratories in July 2021. We estimated testing personnel to be 328 000 (95% CI, 309 000-348 000), which is supported by the count of 318 780 reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. There were twice as many testing personnel in hospital laboratories as in independent laboratories (158 778 versus 74 904, P < .001). Independent laboratories had the highest test volume per person, which was twice as high as physician office laboratories (62 228 versus 30 102, P < .001). Hospital and independent laboratories comprised 34% of all CoA and CoC laboratories but performed the largest portion of testing (81%). Physician office laboratories, accounting for 44% of all CoA and CoC laboratories, performed a comparatively low proportion of total tests (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Numbers of testing personnel vary considerably by laboratory type and across states. These data can provide valuable insight when assessing laboratory workforce training needs and planning for public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"443-452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Numbers of Testing Personnel and Test Volume in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Certificate of Accreditation and Certificate of Compliance Laboratories in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Xia, Thomas H Taylor, Jufu Chen, Jason Hsia\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2022-0345-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Two major categories of laboratories performing nonwaived testing under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) are the Certificate of Accreditation (CoA) and Certificate of Compliance (CoC) laboratories. Accreditation organizations collect more detailed laboratory personnel information than the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES).</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To estimate total numbers of testing personnel and testing volumes in CoA and CoC laboratories, by laboratory type and state.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We developed a statistical inference method by using the respective correlations between testing personnel counts and test volume by laboratory type.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>QIES reported 33 033 active CoA and CoC laboratories in July 2021. We estimated testing personnel to be 328 000 (95% CI, 309 000-348 000), which is supported by the count of 318 780 reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. There were twice as many testing personnel in hospital laboratories as in independent laboratories (158 778 versus 74 904, P < .001). Independent laboratories had the highest test volume per person, which was twice as high as physician office laboratories (62 228 versus 30 102, P < .001). Hospital and independent laboratories comprised 34% of all CoA and CoC laboratories but performed the largest portion of testing (81%). Physician office laboratories, accounting for 44% of all CoA and CoC laboratories, performed a comparatively low proportion of total tests (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Numbers of testing personnel vary considerably by laboratory type and across states. These data can provide valuable insight when assessing laboratory workforce training needs and planning for public health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"443-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0345-OA\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0345-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景根据《1988 年临床实验室改进修正案》(CLIA)的规定,进行非豁免检测的实验室主要有两类,即认可证书实验室(CoA)和达标证书实验室(CoC)。与美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的质量改进与评估系统(QIES)相比,认可组织收集的实验室人员信息更为详细:按实验室类型和州估算 CoA 和 CoC 实验室的检测人员总数和检测量:我们开发了一种统计推断方法,利用各实验室类型的检测人员数量和检测量之间的相关性进行推断:2021 年 7 月,QIES 报告了 33 033 家活跃的 CoA 和 CoC 实验室。我们估计检测人员为 328 000 人(95% CI,309 000-348 000),美国劳工统计局报告的 318 780 人也支持这一估计。医院实验室的检验人员数量是独立实验室的两倍(158 778 对 74 904,P < .001)。独立实验室的人均检测量最高,是医生办公室实验室的两倍(62 228 对 30 102,P < .001)。医院和独立实验室占所有 CoA 和 CoC 实验室的 34%,但承担的检测任务最多(81%)。医生诊室实验室占所有 CoA 和 CoC 实验室的 44%,但进行的检测占总检测的比例相对较低(9%):结论:不同类型的实验室和不同州的检测人员数量差异很大。这些数据可以为评估实验室人员培训需求和规划公共卫生突发事件提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Numbers of Testing Personnel and Test Volume in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Certificate of Accreditation and Certificate of Compliance Laboratories in the United States.

Context.—: Two major categories of laboratories performing nonwaived testing under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) are the Certificate of Accreditation (CoA) and Certificate of Compliance (CoC) laboratories. Accreditation organizations collect more detailed laboratory personnel information than the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES).

Objective.—: To estimate total numbers of testing personnel and testing volumes in CoA and CoC laboratories, by laboratory type and state.

Design.—: We developed a statistical inference method by using the respective correlations between testing personnel counts and test volume by laboratory type.

Results.—: QIES reported 33 033 active CoA and CoC laboratories in July 2021. We estimated testing personnel to be 328 000 (95% CI, 309 000-348 000), which is supported by the count of 318 780 reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. There were twice as many testing personnel in hospital laboratories as in independent laboratories (158 778 versus 74 904, P < .001). Independent laboratories had the highest test volume per person, which was twice as high as physician office laboratories (62 228 versus 30 102, P < .001). Hospital and independent laboratories comprised 34% of all CoA and CoC laboratories but performed the largest portion of testing (81%). Physician office laboratories, accounting for 44% of all CoA and CoC laboratories, performed a comparatively low proportion of total tests (9%).

Conclusions.—: Numbers of testing personnel vary considerably by laboratory type and across states. These data can provide valuable insight when assessing laboratory workforce training needs and planning for public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
期刊最新文献
New Entities and Concepts in Salivary Gland Tumor Pathology: The Role of Molecular Alterations. Update on Sinonasal Tract Malignancies: Advances in Diagnostic Modalities. Update on Salivary Gland Fine-Needle Aspiration and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. BRAF Exon 15 Mutations in the Evaluation of Well-Differentiated Epithelial Nephroblastic Neoplasms in Children: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN03B2. Neoplastic Progression in Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1