{"title":"主干神经嵴重编程为颅嵴样身份改变了它们的转录组和发育潜力","authors":"Sierra S. Marable, Marianne E. Bronner","doi":"10.1016/j.diff.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neural crest cells along the body axis of avian embryos differ in their developmental potential, such that the cranial neural crest forms cartilage and bone whereas the trunk neural crest is unable to do so. Previous studies have identified a cranial crest-specific subcircuit that can imbue the trunk neural crest with the ability to form cartilage after grafting to the head. Here, we examine transcriptional and cell fate changes that accompany this reprogramming. First, we examined whether reprogrammed trunk neural crest maintain the ability to form cartilage in their endogenous environment in the absence of cues from the head. The results show that some reprogrammed cells contribute to normal trunk neural crest derivatives, whereas others migrate ectopically to the forming vertebrae and express cartilage markers, thus mimicking heterotypically transplanted cranial crest cells. We find that reprogrammed trunk neural crest upregulated more than 3000 genes in common with cranial neural crest, including numerous transcriptional regulators. In contrast, many trunk neural crest genes are downregulated. Together, our findings show that reprogramming trunk neural crest with cranial crest subcircuit genes alters their gene regulatory program and developmental potential to be more cranial crest-like.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50579,"journal":{"name":"Differentiation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reprogramming of trunk neural crest to a cranial crest-like identity alters their transcriptome and developmental potential\",\"authors\":\"Sierra S. Marable, Marianne E. Bronner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diff.2023.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neural crest cells along the body axis of avian embryos differ in their developmental potential, such that the cranial neural crest forms cartilage and bone whereas the trunk neural crest is unable to do so. Previous studies have identified a cranial crest-specific subcircuit that can imbue the trunk neural crest with the ability to form cartilage after grafting to the head. Here, we examine transcriptional and cell fate changes that accompany this reprogramming. First, we examined whether reprogrammed trunk neural crest maintain the ability to form cartilage in their endogenous environment in the absence of cues from the head. The results show that some reprogrammed cells contribute to normal trunk neural crest derivatives, whereas others migrate ectopically to the forming vertebrae and express cartilage markers, thus mimicking heterotypically transplanted cranial crest cells. We find that reprogrammed trunk neural crest upregulated more than 3000 genes in common with cranial neural crest, including numerous transcriptional regulators. In contrast, many trunk neural crest genes are downregulated. Together, our findings show that reprogramming trunk neural crest with cranial crest subcircuit genes alters their gene regulatory program and developmental potential to be more cranial crest-like.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Differentiation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Differentiation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301468123000221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Differentiation","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301468123000221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reprogramming of trunk neural crest to a cranial crest-like identity alters their transcriptome and developmental potential
Neural crest cells along the body axis of avian embryos differ in their developmental potential, such that the cranial neural crest forms cartilage and bone whereas the trunk neural crest is unable to do so. Previous studies have identified a cranial crest-specific subcircuit that can imbue the trunk neural crest with the ability to form cartilage after grafting to the head. Here, we examine transcriptional and cell fate changes that accompany this reprogramming. First, we examined whether reprogrammed trunk neural crest maintain the ability to form cartilage in their endogenous environment in the absence of cues from the head. The results show that some reprogrammed cells contribute to normal trunk neural crest derivatives, whereas others migrate ectopically to the forming vertebrae and express cartilage markers, thus mimicking heterotypically transplanted cranial crest cells. We find that reprogrammed trunk neural crest upregulated more than 3000 genes in common with cranial neural crest, including numerous transcriptional regulators. In contrast, many trunk neural crest genes are downregulated. Together, our findings show that reprogramming trunk neural crest with cranial crest subcircuit genes alters their gene regulatory program and developmental potential to be more cranial crest-like.
期刊介绍:
Differentiation is a multidisciplinary journal dealing with topics relating to cell differentiation, development, cellular structure and function, and cancer. Differentiation of eukaryotes at the molecular level and the use of transgenic and targeted mutagenesis approaches to problems of differentiation are of particular interest to the journal.
The journal will publish full-length articles containing original work in any of these areas. We will also publish reviews and commentaries on topics of current interest.
The principal subject areas the journal covers are: • embryonic patterning and organogenesis
• human development and congenital malformation
• mechanisms of cell lineage commitment
• tissue homeostasis and oncogenic transformation
• establishment of cellular polarity
• stem cell differentiation
• cell reprogramming mechanisms
• stability of the differentiated state
• cell and tissue interactions in vivo and in vitro
• signal transduction pathways in development and differentiation
• carcinogenesis and cancer
• mechanisms involved in cell growth and division especially relating to cancer
• differentiation in regeneration and ageing
• therapeutic applications of differentiation processes.