在溶胶-凝胶玻璃中浸渍的Rh-110/Rh-6G和Rh-19/Rh-B有机染料对的常规FRET和光捕获性能的比较研究。

IF 2.4 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Methods and Applications in Fluorescence Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4
Kapil Dev Mahato, Uday Kumar
{"title":"在溶胶-凝胶玻璃中浸渍的Rh-110/Rh-6G和Rh-19/Rh-B有机染料对的常规FRET和光捕获性能的比较研究。","authors":"Kapil Dev Mahato,&nbsp;Uday Kumar","doi":"10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two different pairs of laser dyes, Rhodamine-110 (Rh-110)/Rhodamine-6G (Rh-6G) and Rhodamine-19 (Rh-19)/Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (the first dye in each pair as a donor and the second as an acceptor) were impregnated in silica samples prepared by the sol-gel method and spectroscopically studied using absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The critical transfer distance (R<sub>0</sub>), actual distance (r) between the donor and acceptor, overlap integral [J(υ¯)], FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) efficiency (E), and antenna effect efficiency (AE) were investigated in detail based on the variation in acceptor concentration. The FRET efficiency, antenna effect efficiency, and actual donor-acceptor distance for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B dye pairs corresponding to acceptor concentration ranges (3.83 to 7.65) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>and (3.71 to 8.34) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, were found to be in the ranges of 57.38% to 74.89%, 36.97% to 24.13%, 5.44 nm to 4.77 nm, and 77.01%. Furthermore, maximum FRET efficiencies of 85.68% and 87.63% and antenna effect efficiencies of 36.97% and 40.95% for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B, respectively, were also reported. Our results demonstrate the superior FRET efficiency of Rh-19/Rh-B over Rh-110/Rh-6G dye pair in sol-gel glasses, while the antenna effect efficiency of Rh-110/Rh-6G is higher than that of Rh-19/Rh-B for the same donor to acceptor (D/A) ratio. Finally, Rh-110/Rh-6G is a better energy harvester than the Rh-19/Rh-B dye pair at the common D/A ratio. These results are explained in terms of molecular structure similarity, polarity, and rigidity of donor and acceptor.</p>","PeriodicalId":18596,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of conventional FRET and light harvesting properties of Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B organic dye pairs impregnated in sol-gel glasses.\",\"authors\":\"Kapil Dev Mahato,&nbsp;Uday Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two different pairs of laser dyes, Rhodamine-110 (Rh-110)/Rhodamine-6G (Rh-6G) and Rhodamine-19 (Rh-19)/Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (the first dye in each pair as a donor and the second as an acceptor) were impregnated in silica samples prepared by the sol-gel method and spectroscopically studied using absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The critical transfer distance (R<sub>0</sub>), actual distance (r) between the donor and acceptor, overlap integral [J(υ¯)], FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) efficiency (E), and antenna effect efficiency (AE) were investigated in detail based on the variation in acceptor concentration. The FRET efficiency, antenna effect efficiency, and actual donor-acceptor distance for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B dye pairs corresponding to acceptor concentration ranges (3.83 to 7.65) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>and (3.71 to 8.34) × 10<sup>-5</sup>M l<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, were found to be in the ranges of 57.38% to 74.89%, 36.97% to 24.13%, 5.44 nm to 4.77 nm, and 77.01%. Furthermore, maximum FRET efficiencies of 85.68% and 87.63% and antenna effect efficiencies of 36.97% and 40.95% for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B, respectively, were also reported. Our results demonstrate the superior FRET efficiency of Rh-19/Rh-B over Rh-110/Rh-6G dye pair in sol-gel glasses, while the antenna effect efficiency of Rh-110/Rh-6G is higher than that of Rh-19/Rh-B for the same donor to acceptor (D/A) ratio. Finally, Rh-110/Rh-6G is a better energy harvester than the Rh-19/Rh-B dye pair at the common D/A ratio. These results are explained in terms of molecular structure similarity, polarity, and rigidity of donor and acceptor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Applications in Fluorescence","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/accfe4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将两对不同的激光染料罗丹明-110 (Rh-110)/罗丹明- 6g (Rh-6G)和罗丹明-19 (Rh-19)/罗丹明- b (Rh-B)(每对中的第一个染料作为供体,第二个染料作为受体)浸染在溶胶-凝胶法制备的二氧化硅样品中,并使用吸收和稳态荧光技术对其进行光谱研究。基于受体浓度的变化,详细研究了临界转移距离(R0)、施主和受主之间的实际距离(r)、重叠积分[J(υ¯)]、荧光共振能量转移效率(FRET)和天线效应效率(AE)。受体浓度范围分别为(3.83 ~ 7.65)× 10-5M -1和(3.71 ~ 8.34)× 10-5M -1时,Rh-110/Rh-6G和Rh-19/Rh-B染料对的FRET效率、天线效应效率和实际供体-受体距离分别为57.38% ~ 74.89%、36.97% ~ 24.13%、5.44 ~ 4.77 nm和77.01%。Rh-110/Rh-6G和Rh-19/Rh-B的最大FRET效率分别为85.68%和87.63%,天线效应效率分别为36.97%和40.95%。结果表明,在溶胶-凝胶玻璃中,Rh-19/Rh-B染料对的FRET效率优于Rh-110/Rh-6G染料对,而在相同的供体/受体(D/A)比下,Rh-110/Rh-6G染料对的天线效应效率高于Rh-19/Rh-B染料对。最后,在普通D/ a比下,Rh-110/Rh-6G是比Rh-19/Rh-B染料对更好的能量收集器。这些结果解释了分子结构的相似性,极性,和刚性的供体和受体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of conventional FRET and light harvesting properties of Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B organic dye pairs impregnated in sol-gel glasses.

Two different pairs of laser dyes, Rhodamine-110 (Rh-110)/Rhodamine-6G (Rh-6G) and Rhodamine-19 (Rh-19)/Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (the first dye in each pair as a donor and the second as an acceptor) were impregnated in silica samples prepared by the sol-gel method and spectroscopically studied using absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The critical transfer distance (R0), actual distance (r) between the donor and acceptor, overlap integral [J(υ¯)], FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) efficiency (E), and antenna effect efficiency (AE) were investigated in detail based on the variation in acceptor concentration. The FRET efficiency, antenna effect efficiency, and actual donor-acceptor distance for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B dye pairs corresponding to acceptor concentration ranges (3.83 to 7.65) × 10-5M l-1and (3.71 to 8.34) × 10-5M l-1, respectively, were found to be in the ranges of 57.38% to 74.89%, 36.97% to 24.13%, 5.44 nm to 4.77 nm, and 77.01%. Furthermore, maximum FRET efficiencies of 85.68% and 87.63% and antenna effect efficiencies of 36.97% and 40.95% for Rh-110/Rh-6G and Rh-19/Rh-B, respectively, were also reported. Our results demonstrate the superior FRET efficiency of Rh-19/Rh-B over Rh-110/Rh-6G dye pair in sol-gel glasses, while the antenna effect efficiency of Rh-110/Rh-6G is higher than that of Rh-19/Rh-B for the same donor to acceptor (D/A) ratio. Finally, Rh-110/Rh-6G is a better energy harvester than the Rh-19/Rh-B dye pair at the common D/A ratio. These results are explained in terms of molecular structure similarity, polarity, and rigidity of donor and acceptor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICALCHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL&n-CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Methods and Applications in Fluorescence focuses on new developments in fluorescence spectroscopy, imaging, microscopy, fluorescent probes, labels and (nano)materials. It will feature both methods and advanced (bio)applications and accepts original research articles, reviews and technical notes.
期刊最新文献
Detection of Antimicrobial-Induced Survival/Dead Bacteria via mEos4b Photoconversion: A Preliminary Study. Naphthylated LEGO-lipophosphonoxin antibiotics used as a fluorescent tool for the observation of target membrane perturbations preceding its disruption. CombiningNitellopsis obtusaautofluorescence intensity and F680/F750 ratio to discriminate responses to environmental stressors. Effect of Mn2+doping and DDAB-assisted postpassivation on the structural and optical properties of CsPb(Cl/Br)3halide perovskite nanocrystals. Effect of molecular crowders on ligand binding kinetics with G-quadruplex DNA probed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1