Ewa Kulis, Zofia Szczuka, Anna Banik, Maria Siwa, Monika Boberska, Karolina Zarychta, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Urte Scholz, Konstantin Schenkel, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"体育活动计划干预、二人组的体脂和高能量食物摄入:涟漪效应、溢出效应还是补偿效应?","authors":"Ewa Kulis, Zofia Szczuka, Anna Banik, Maria Siwa, Monika Boberska, Karolina Zarychta, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Urte Scholz, Konstantin Schenkel, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2233001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is unclear if planning to change one behavior may prompt changes in other health behaviors or health outcomes. This study tested if physical activity (PA) planning interventions may result in (i) a body fat reduction in target persons and their dyadic partners (a ripple effect), (ii) a decrease in energy-dense food intake (a spillover effect), or an increase in energy-dense food intake (a compensatory effect).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong><i>N</i> = 320 adult-adult dyads were assigned to an individual ('I-for-me'), dyadic ('we-for-me'), or collaborative ('we-for-us') PA planning intervention or a control condition. Body fat and energy-dense food intake were measured at baseline and at the 36-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No Time x Condition effects were found for target persons' body fat. There was a reduction in body fat among partners participating in any PA planning intervention, compared to the control condition. Across conditions, target persons and partners reduced energy-dense food intake over time. The reduction was smaller among target persons assigned to the individual PA planning condition compared to the control condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA planning interventions delivered to dyads may result in a ripple effect involving body fat reduction among partners. Among target persons, the individual PA planning may activate compensatory changes in energy-dense food intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"433-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical activity planning interventions, body fat and energy-dense food intake in dyads: ripple, spillover, or compensatory effects?\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Kulis, Zofia Szczuka, Anna Banik, Maria Siwa, Monika Boberska, Karolina Zarychta, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Urte Scholz, Konstantin Schenkel, Aleksandra Luszczynska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2023.2233001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is unclear if planning to change one behavior may prompt changes in other health behaviors or health outcomes. This study tested if physical activity (PA) planning interventions may result in (i) a body fat reduction in target persons and their dyadic partners (a ripple effect), (ii) a decrease in energy-dense food intake (a spillover effect), or an increase in energy-dense food intake (a compensatory effect).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong><i>N</i> = 320 adult-adult dyads were assigned to an individual ('I-for-me'), dyadic ('we-for-me'), or collaborative ('we-for-us') PA planning intervention or a control condition. Body fat and energy-dense food intake were measured at baseline and at the 36-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No Time x Condition effects were found for target persons' body fat. There was a reduction in body fat among partners participating in any PA planning intervention, compared to the control condition. Across conditions, target persons and partners reduced energy-dense food intake over time. The reduction was smaller among target persons assigned to the individual PA planning condition compared to the control condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA planning interventions delivered to dyads may result in a ripple effect involving body fat reduction among partners. Among target persons, the individual PA planning may activate compensatory changes in energy-dense food intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2233001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2233001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:目前还不清楚计划改变一种行为是否会促使其他健康行为或健康结果发生变化。本研究测试了体力活动(PA)计划干预是否会导致:(i)目标人群及其伴侣的体脂减少(涟漪效应);(ii)高能量食物摄入量减少(溢出效应)或高能量食物摄入量增加(补偿效应):N=320个成人-成人二人组被分配到个人("我为我")、二人组("我们为我")或合作("我们为我们")PA规划干预或对照条件下。在基线和36周的随访中测量了体脂和高能量食物的摄入量:结果:在目标人群的体脂方面没有发现时间 x 条件效应。与对照组相比,参与任何PA规划干预的伴侣的体脂都有所减少。在不同的条件下,目标人群和伴侣随着时间的推移减少了高能量食物的摄入量。与对照组相比,被分配到个人PA规划条件下的目标人群减少的幅度较小:结论:对二人进行体育锻炼规划干预可能会产生连锁效应,使伴侣的体脂减少。在目标人群中,个人PA规划可能会激活能量密度食物摄入量的补偿性变化。
Physical activity planning interventions, body fat and energy-dense food intake in dyads: ripple, spillover, or compensatory effects?
Objectives: It is unclear if planning to change one behavior may prompt changes in other health behaviors or health outcomes. This study tested if physical activity (PA) planning interventions may result in (i) a body fat reduction in target persons and their dyadic partners (a ripple effect), (ii) a decrease in energy-dense food intake (a spillover effect), or an increase in energy-dense food intake (a compensatory effect).
Method: N = 320 adult-adult dyads were assigned to an individual ('I-for-me'), dyadic ('we-for-me'), or collaborative ('we-for-us') PA planning intervention or a control condition. Body fat and energy-dense food intake were measured at baseline and at the 36-week follow-up.
Results: No Time x Condition effects were found for target persons' body fat. There was a reduction in body fat among partners participating in any PA planning intervention, compared to the control condition. Across conditions, target persons and partners reduced energy-dense food intake over time. The reduction was smaller among target persons assigned to the individual PA planning condition compared to the control condition.
Conclusions: PA planning interventions delivered to dyads may result in a ripple effect involving body fat reduction among partners. Among target persons, the individual PA planning may activate compensatory changes in energy-dense food intake.
期刊介绍:
Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.