介绍政府间政策产出数据集。

Magnus Lundgren, Theresa Squatrito, Thomas Sommerer, Jonas Tallberg
{"title":"介绍政府间政策产出数据集。","authors":"Magnus Lundgren,&nbsp;Theresa Squatrito,&nbsp;Thomas Sommerer,&nbsp;Jonas Tallberg","doi":"10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing recognition that international organizations (IOs) formulate and adopt policy in a wide range of areas. IOs have emerged as key venues for states seeking joint solutions to contemporary challenges such as climate change or COVID-19, and to establish frameworks to bolster trade, development, security, and more. In this capacity, IOs produce both extraordinary and routine policy output with a multitude of purposes, ranging from policies of historic significance like admitting new members to the more mundane tasks of administering IO staff. This article introduces the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD), which covers close to 37,000 individual policy acts of 13 multi-issue IOs in the 1980-2015 period. The dataset fills a gap in the growing body of literature on the comparative study of IOs, providing researchers with a fine-grained perspective on the structure of IO policy output and data for comparisons across time, policy areas, and organizations. This article describes the construction and coverage of the dataset and identifies key temporal and cross-sectional patterns revealed by the data. In a concise illustration of the dataset's utility, we apply models of punctuated equilibria in a comparative study of the relationship between institutional features and broad policy agenda dynamics. Overall, the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset offers a unique resource for researchers to analyze IO policy output in a granular manner and to explore questions of responsiveness, performance, and legitimacy of IOs.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":75182,"journal":{"name":"The review of international organizations","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242228/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD).\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Lundgren,&nbsp;Theresa Squatrito,&nbsp;Thomas Sommerer,&nbsp;Jonas Tallberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a growing recognition that international organizations (IOs) formulate and adopt policy in a wide range of areas. IOs have emerged as key venues for states seeking joint solutions to contemporary challenges such as climate change or COVID-19, and to establish frameworks to bolster trade, development, security, and more. In this capacity, IOs produce both extraordinary and routine policy output with a multitude of purposes, ranging from policies of historic significance like admitting new members to the more mundane tasks of administering IO staff. This article introduces the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD), which covers close to 37,000 individual policy acts of 13 multi-issue IOs in the 1980-2015 period. The dataset fills a gap in the growing body of literature on the comparative study of IOs, providing researchers with a fine-grained perspective on the structure of IO policy output and data for comparisons across time, policy areas, and organizations. This article describes the construction and coverage of the dataset and identifies key temporal and cross-sectional patterns revealed by the data. In a concise illustration of the dataset's utility, we apply models of punctuated equilibria in a comparative study of the relationship between institutional features and broad policy agenda dynamics. Overall, the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset offers a unique resource for researchers to analyze IO policy output in a granular manner and to explore questions of responsiveness, performance, and legitimacy of IOs.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The review of international organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们越来越认识到,国际组织在广泛的领域制定和通过政策。国际组织已成为各国寻求共同解决气候变化或新冠肺炎等当代挑战的关键场所,并建立支持贸易、发展、安全等的框架。在这种能力下,IO产生了具有多种目的的特殊和常规政策输出,从具有历史意义的政策(如接纳新成员)到管理IO工作人员的更平凡的任务。本文介绍了政府间政策产出数据集(IPOD),该数据集涵盖了1980-2015年期间13个多问题IO的近37000项个人政策行为。该数据集填补了越来越多的IO比较研究文献中的空白,为研究人员提供了一个关于IO政策输出结构的细粒度视角,以及跨时间、政策领域和组织进行比较的数据。本文描述了数据集的构建和覆盖范围,并确定了数据所揭示的关键时间和横截面模式。在数据集效用的简明说明中,我们将间断均衡模型应用于制度特征与广泛政策议程动态之间关系的比较研究。总的来说,政府间政策输出数据集为研究人员提供了一个独特的资源,可以以细粒度的方式分析IO政策输出,并探索IO的响应性、性能和合法性问题。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introducing the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD).

There is a growing recognition that international organizations (IOs) formulate and adopt policy in a wide range of areas. IOs have emerged as key venues for states seeking joint solutions to contemporary challenges such as climate change or COVID-19, and to establish frameworks to bolster trade, development, security, and more. In this capacity, IOs produce both extraordinary and routine policy output with a multitude of purposes, ranging from policies of historic significance like admitting new members to the more mundane tasks of administering IO staff. This article introduces the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD), which covers close to 37,000 individual policy acts of 13 multi-issue IOs in the 1980-2015 period. The dataset fills a gap in the growing body of literature on the comparative study of IOs, providing researchers with a fine-grained perspective on the structure of IO policy output and data for comparisons across time, policy areas, and organizations. This article describes the construction and coverage of the dataset and identifies key temporal and cross-sectional patterns revealed by the data. In a concise illustration of the dataset's utility, we apply models of punctuated equilibria in a comparative study of the relationship between institutional features and broad policy agenda dynamics. Overall, the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset offers a unique resource for researchers to analyze IO policy output in a granular manner and to explore questions of responsiveness, performance, and legitimacy of IOs.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-023-09492-6.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The brothers Karamazov go abroad: A dataset of Russian leaders’ foreign visits Global value chains and the design of trade agreements Locking in democracy? Transitions, returning autocratic elites, and human rights treaty commitment Power by Proxy: Participation as a Resource in Global Governance Less is more: Property rights and dictators’ demand for foreign direct investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1