理疗师为心血管疾病患者开具的运动处方是否符合欧洲建议?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad065
Nastasia Marinus, Véronique Cornelissen, Raf Meesen, Karin Coninx, Dominique Hansen
{"title":"理疗师为心血管疾病患者开具的运动处方是否符合欧洲建议?","authors":"Nastasia Marinus, Véronique Cornelissen, Raf Meesen, Karin Coninx, Dominique Hansen","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvad065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Physiotherapists often treat patients with (elevated risk for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), and should thus be able to provide evidence-based exercise advice to these patients. This study, therefore, aims to examine whether exercise prescriptions by physiotherapists to patients with CVD are in accordance with European recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This prospective observational survey included forty-seven Belgian physiotherapists. The participants agreed to prescribe exercise intensity, frequency, session duration, program duration, and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same three patient cases. Exercise prescriptions were compared between physiotherapists and relations with their characteristics were studied. The agreement between physiotherapists' exercise prescriptions and those from European recommendations ('agreement score': based on a maximal score of 60/per case) was assessed. A wide inter-clinician variability was noticed for all exercise modalities, leading to a large variance for total peak-effort training minutes (from 461 up to 9000 over the three cases). The exercise frequency was prescribed fully out of range of the recommendations and the prescription of additional exercise modes was generally flawed. Exercise intensity and program duration were prescribed partially correct. The addition of strength exercises and session duration was prescribed correctly. This led to physiotherapist agreement scores of 25.3 ± 9.6, 23.2 ± 9.9, and 27.1 ± 10.6 (all out of 60), for cases one, two, and three, respectively. A greater agreement score was found in younger colleagues and those holding a Ph.D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise prescriptions for CVD patients vary widely among physiotherapists and often disagree with European recommendations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05449652.</p>","PeriodicalId":50493,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are exercise prescriptions for patients with cardiovascular disease, made by physiotherapists, in agreement with European recommendations?\",\"authors\":\"Nastasia Marinus, Véronique Cornelissen, Raf Meesen, Karin Coninx, Dominique Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjcn/zvad065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Physiotherapists often treat patients with (elevated risk for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), and should thus be able to provide evidence-based exercise advice to these patients. This study, therefore, aims to examine whether exercise prescriptions by physiotherapists to patients with CVD are in accordance with European recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This prospective observational survey included forty-seven Belgian physiotherapists. The participants agreed to prescribe exercise intensity, frequency, session duration, program duration, and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same three patient cases. Exercise prescriptions were compared between physiotherapists and relations with their characteristics were studied. The agreement between physiotherapists' exercise prescriptions and those from European recommendations ('agreement score': based on a maximal score of 60/per case) was assessed. A wide inter-clinician variability was noticed for all exercise modalities, leading to a large variance for total peak-effort training minutes (from 461 up to 9000 over the three cases). The exercise frequency was prescribed fully out of range of the recommendations and the prescription of additional exercise modes was generally flawed. Exercise intensity and program duration were prescribed partially correct. The addition of strength exercises and session duration was prescribed correctly. This led to physiotherapist agreement scores of 25.3 ± 9.6, 23.2 ± 9.9, and 27.1 ± 10.6 (all out of 60), for cases one, two, and three, respectively. A greater agreement score was found in younger colleagues and those holding a Ph.D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise prescriptions for CVD patients vary widely among physiotherapists and often disagree with European recommendations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05449652.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:物理治疗师经常为心血管疾病(CVD)高风险患者提供治疗,因此应该能够为这些患者提供循证运动建议。因此,本研究旨在探讨物理治疗师为心血管疾病患者开具的运动处方是否符合欧洲建议:这项前瞻性观察调查包括 47 名比利时物理治疗师。参与者同意为相同的三个病例开具运动强度、频率、疗程时间、项目持续时间和运动类型(耐力或力量训练)的处方。对物理治疗师之间的运动处方进行了比较,并研究了运动处方与物理治疗师特征之间的关系。评估了物理治疗师的运动处方与欧洲建议的运动处方之间的一致性("一致性评分":基于每例最高 60 分)。在所有运动方式中,医生之间的差异都很大,导致总峰值努力训练分钟数的差异也很大(三个病例中从 461 分钟到 9000 分钟不等)。运动频率的处方完全超出了建议范围,额外运动模式的处方普遍存在缺陷。运动强度和项目持续时间的建议部分正确。增加力量练习和疗程时间的处方是正确的。因此,物理治疗师对病例一、病例二和病例三的一致性评分分别为 25.3 ± 9.6、23.2 ± 9.9 和 27.1 ± 10.6(满分均为 60 分)。年轻同事和拥有博士学位的同事的一致得分更高:物理治疗师对心血管疾病患者的运动处方差异很大,而且往往与欧洲的建议不一致:注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05449652。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are exercise prescriptions for patients with cardiovascular disease, made by physiotherapists, in agreement with European recommendations?

Aims: Physiotherapists often treat patients with (elevated risk for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), and should thus be able to provide evidence-based exercise advice to these patients. This study, therefore, aims to examine whether exercise prescriptions by physiotherapists to patients with CVD are in accordance with European recommendations.

Methods and results: This prospective observational survey included forty-seven Belgian physiotherapists. The participants agreed to prescribe exercise intensity, frequency, session duration, program duration, and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same three patient cases. Exercise prescriptions were compared between physiotherapists and relations with their characteristics were studied. The agreement between physiotherapists' exercise prescriptions and those from European recommendations ('agreement score': based on a maximal score of 60/per case) was assessed. A wide inter-clinician variability was noticed for all exercise modalities, leading to a large variance for total peak-effort training minutes (from 461 up to 9000 over the three cases). The exercise frequency was prescribed fully out of range of the recommendations and the prescription of additional exercise modes was generally flawed. Exercise intensity and program duration were prescribed partially correct. The addition of strength exercises and session duration was prescribed correctly. This led to physiotherapist agreement scores of 25.3 ± 9.6, 23.2 ± 9.9, and 27.1 ± 10.6 (all out of 60), for cases one, two, and three, respectively. A greater agreement score was found in younger colleagues and those holding a Ph.D.

Conclusion: Exercise prescriptions for CVD patients vary widely among physiotherapists and often disagree with European recommendations.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05449652.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-NURSING
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed journal of the European Society of Cardiology’s Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP) covering the broad field of cardiovascular nursing including chronic and acute care, cardiac rehabilitation, primary and secondary prevention, heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, interventional cardiology, cardiac care, and vascular nursing.
期刊最新文献
Interviewing people on sensitive topics: challenges and strategies Prehospital treatment-seeking for acute coronary syndrome in culturally and linguistically diverse immigrant populations: a scoping review Finding peace in a new version of oneself- a qualitative study of post operative patients after aorta dissection and their experiences of cardiac rehabilitation Psychometric properties of the KCCQ-12 in an european cohort of patients with heart failure Patients' experiences of a digital group education targeting kinesiophobia after myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation - a qualitative pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1