香港脆弱拟杆菌群生物的耐药性,2020-2021年。

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Anaerobe Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102756
Hanshu Fang , Xin Li , Mei-Kum Yan , Man-Ki Tong , Kin-Hung Chow , Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng , Pak-Leung Ho
{"title":"香港脆弱拟杆菌群生物的耐药性,2020-2021年。","authors":"Hanshu Fang ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Mei-Kum Yan ,&nbsp;Man-Ki Tong ,&nbsp;Kin-Hung Chow ,&nbsp;Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng ,&nbsp;Pak-Leung Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This retrospective study analyzed the susceptibility levels of <span><em>Bacteroides fragilis</em></span><span><span> group (BFG) in a hospital-based laboratory where disk diffusion test (DDT) was routinely performed. Isolates non-susceptible to </span>imipenem<span> and metronidazole by DDT were further investigated using a gradient method.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The DDT and MIC susceptibility data of clindamycin<span><span>, metronidazole, moxifloxacin and imipenem obtained on </span>Brucella<span> blood agar for 1264 non-duplicated isolates during 2020–2021 were analyzed. Species identification was obtained by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA<span> sequencing. Interpretative agreement of DDT results using the 2015 EUCAST tentative and 2021 CA-SFM breakpoints was compared against MIC as the reference.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dataset included 604 <em>B. fragilis</em> (483 division I, 121 division II isolates), 415 non-<em>fragilis Bacteroides</em>, 177 <em>Phocaeicola</em> and 68 <span><em>Parabacteroides</em></span><span>. Susceptibility rates for clindamycin (22.1–62.1%) and moxifloxacin (59.9–80.9%) were low and many had no inhibition zones. At the EUCAST and CA-SFM breakpoints, 83.0 and 89.4% were imipenem-susceptible, and 89.6% and 97.4 were metronidazole-susceptible. MIC testing confirmed 11.4% and 2.8% isolates as imipenem-non-susceptible and metronidazole-resistant, respectively. Significant numbers of false-susceptibility and/or false-resistance results were observed at the CA-SFM breakpoint but not the EUCAST breakpoint. Higher rates of imipenem and/or metronidazole resistance were detected in </span><em>B. fragilis</em> division II, <em>B. caccae, B. ovatus, B. salyersiae, B. stercoris</em> and <em>Parabacteroides</em>. Co-resistance to imipenem and metronidazole was detected in 3 <em>B. fragilis</em> division II isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The data demonstrated emerging BFG resistance to several important anti-anaerobic antibiotics and highlights the importance of anaerobic susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories to guide therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8050,"journal":{"name":"Anaerobe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong, 2020–2021\",\"authors\":\"Hanshu Fang ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Mei-Kum Yan ,&nbsp;Man-Ki Tong ,&nbsp;Kin-Hung Chow ,&nbsp;Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng ,&nbsp;Pak-Leung Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This retrospective study analyzed the susceptibility levels of <span><em>Bacteroides fragilis</em></span><span><span> group (BFG) in a hospital-based laboratory where disk diffusion test (DDT) was routinely performed. Isolates non-susceptible to </span>imipenem<span> and metronidazole by DDT were further investigated using a gradient method.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The DDT and MIC susceptibility data of clindamycin<span><span>, metronidazole, moxifloxacin and imipenem obtained on </span>Brucella<span> blood agar for 1264 non-duplicated isolates during 2020–2021 were analyzed. Species identification was obtained by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA<span> sequencing. Interpretative agreement of DDT results using the 2015 EUCAST tentative and 2021 CA-SFM breakpoints was compared against MIC as the reference.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dataset included 604 <em>B. fragilis</em> (483 division I, 121 division II isolates), 415 non-<em>fragilis Bacteroides</em>, 177 <em>Phocaeicola</em> and 68 <span><em>Parabacteroides</em></span><span>. Susceptibility rates for clindamycin (22.1–62.1%) and moxifloxacin (59.9–80.9%) were low and many had no inhibition zones. At the EUCAST and CA-SFM breakpoints, 83.0 and 89.4% were imipenem-susceptible, and 89.6% and 97.4 were metronidazole-susceptible. MIC testing confirmed 11.4% and 2.8% isolates as imipenem-non-susceptible and metronidazole-resistant, respectively. Significant numbers of false-susceptibility and/or false-resistance results were observed at the CA-SFM breakpoint but not the EUCAST breakpoint. Higher rates of imipenem and/or metronidazole resistance were detected in </span><em>B. fragilis</em> division II, <em>B. caccae, B. ovatus, B. salyersiae, B. stercoris</em> and <em>Parabacteroides</em>. Co-resistance to imipenem and metronidazole was detected in 3 <em>B. fragilis</em> division II isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The data demonstrated emerging BFG resistance to several important anti-anaerobic antibiotics and highlights the importance of anaerobic susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories to guide therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaerobe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaerobe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaerobe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项回顾性研究分析了脆弱拟杆菌群(BFG)在医院实验室的易感性水平,该实验室定期进行纸片扩散试验(DDT)。用梯度法对DDT对亚胺培南和甲硝唑不敏感的分离株进行了进一步的研究。方法:分析2020-2021年期间1264株非重复分离株在布鲁氏菌血琼脂上获得的克林霉素、甲硝唑、莫西沙星和亚胺培南的DDT和MIC药敏数据。物种鉴定通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱和16S rRNA测序获得。将使用2015年EUCAST暂定和2021年CA-SFM断点的DDT结果的解释性一致性与MIC作为参考进行了比较。结果:数据集包括604个B。脆弱杆菌(483个I区,121个II区分离株)、415个非脆弱类杆菌、177个Phocaeicola和68个副杆菌。克林霉素(22.1-62.1%)和莫西沙星(59.9-80.9%)的敏感率较低,许多药物没有抑制区。在EUCAST和CA-SFM断点处,亚胺培南敏感性分别为83.0%和89.4%,甲硝唑敏感性分别为89.6%和97.4%。MIC检测证实,11.4%和2.8%的分离株对亚胺培南不敏感,对甲硝唑耐药。在CA-SFM断点处观察到大量的假易感性和/或假耐药性结果,但在EUCAST断点处没有观察到。脆弱B.fragilis division II、B.caccae、B.ovatus、B.salyersiae、B.stercoris和Parabacteroides中检测到较高的亚胺培南和/或甲硝唑耐药性。对亚胺培南和甲硝唑共耐药3例。脆弱性II区分离株。结论:这些数据表明BFG对几种重要的抗厌氧抗生素产生了新的耐药性,并强调了临床实验室厌氧药敏试验对指导治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong, 2020–2021

Objectives

This retrospective study analyzed the susceptibility levels of Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) in a hospital-based laboratory where disk diffusion test (DDT) was routinely performed. Isolates non-susceptible to imipenem and metronidazole by DDT were further investigated using a gradient method.

Methods

The DDT and MIC susceptibility data of clindamycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin and imipenem obtained on Brucella blood agar for 1264 non-duplicated isolates during 2020–2021 were analyzed. Species identification was obtained by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA sequencing. Interpretative agreement of DDT results using the 2015 EUCAST tentative and 2021 CA-SFM breakpoints was compared against MIC as the reference.

Results

The dataset included 604 B. fragilis (483 division I, 121 division II isolates), 415 non-fragilis Bacteroides, 177 Phocaeicola and 68 Parabacteroides. Susceptibility rates for clindamycin (22.1–62.1%) and moxifloxacin (59.9–80.9%) were low and many had no inhibition zones. At the EUCAST and CA-SFM breakpoints, 83.0 and 89.4% were imipenem-susceptible, and 89.6% and 97.4 were metronidazole-susceptible. MIC testing confirmed 11.4% and 2.8% isolates as imipenem-non-susceptible and metronidazole-resistant, respectively. Significant numbers of false-susceptibility and/or false-resistance results were observed at the CA-SFM breakpoint but not the EUCAST breakpoint. Higher rates of imipenem and/or metronidazole resistance were detected in B. fragilis division II, B. caccae, B. ovatus, B. salyersiae, B. stercoris and Parabacteroides. Co-resistance to imipenem and metronidazole was detected in 3 B. fragilis division II isolates.

Conclusions

The data demonstrated emerging BFG resistance to several important anti-anaerobic antibiotics and highlights the importance of anaerobic susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories to guide therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaerobe
Anaerobe 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Anaerobe is essential reading for those who wish to remain at the forefront of discoveries relating to life processes of strictly anaerobes. The journal is multi-disciplinary, and provides a unique forum for those investigating anaerobic organisms that cause infections in humans and animals, as well as anaerobes that play roles in microbiomes or environmental processes. Anaerobe publishes reviews, mini reviews, original research articles, notes and case reports. Relevant topics fall into the broad categories of anaerobes in human and animal diseases, anaerobes in the microbiome, anaerobes in the environment, diagnosis of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories, molecular biology, genetics, pathogenesis, toxins and antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong, 2020-2021". Editorial: Pathogenic clostridia Editorial Board A subanalysis of Clostridium perfringens bloodstream infections from a 5-year retrospective nationwide survey (ITANAEROBY) Clostridium perfringens antigens and challenges for development of vaccines against necrotic enteritis in poultry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1