增强型物种间交流手段在动物语言研究中的应用综述。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1002/wcs.1647
Gabriella E Smith, Amalia P M Bastos, Ashley Evenson, Leo Trottier, Federico Rossano
{"title":"增强型物种间交流手段在动物语言研究中的应用综述。","authors":"Gabriella E Smith,&nbsp;Amalia P M Bastos,&nbsp;Ashley Evenson,&nbsp;Leo Trottier,&nbsp;Federico Rossano","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Countless discussions have been generated by the animal language studies, specifically those utilizing mechanical interfaces, termed here Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC) devices (e.g., lexigrams; magnetic chips; keyboards). Overall, three concerns dominate the field: (1) claims that AIC device using animals manifest linguistic skills remain nebulous, and simpler alternative mechanisms have been proposed (e.g., associative learning); (2) such methodology may be unsuitable as some theorize AIC device interfaces are not sufficiently ecologically relevant to foster meaningful use; (3) data may be considered dubious due to potential cueing from experimenters and lack of systematicity in reporting training and performance. Despite such controversy-which eventually led to the field's deterioration around the last quarter of the twentieth century-this research also saw important successes, such as improvements in captive animal welfare, the outcomes of which hold promise for future interspecies communication work. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Evolution of Language.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":"14 4","pages":"e1647"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Augmentative Interspecies Communication devices in animal language studies: A review.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella E Smith,&nbsp;Amalia P M Bastos,&nbsp;Ashley Evenson,&nbsp;Leo Trottier,&nbsp;Federico Rossano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcs.1647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Countless discussions have been generated by the animal language studies, specifically those utilizing mechanical interfaces, termed here Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC) devices (e.g., lexigrams; magnetic chips; keyboards). Overall, three concerns dominate the field: (1) claims that AIC device using animals manifest linguistic skills remain nebulous, and simpler alternative mechanisms have been proposed (e.g., associative learning); (2) such methodology may be unsuitable as some theorize AIC device interfaces are not sufficiently ecologically relevant to foster meaningful use; (3) data may be considered dubious due to potential cueing from experimenters and lack of systematicity in reporting training and performance. Despite such controversy-which eventually led to the field's deterioration around the last quarter of the twentieth century-this research also saw important successes, such as improvements in captive animal welfare, the outcomes of which hold promise for future interspecies communication work. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Evolution of Language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"e1647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1647\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

动物语言研究已经产生了无数的讨论,特别是那些利用机械接口的研究,在这里被称为增强种间交流(AIC)设备(例如,词典;磁性芯片;键盘)。总的来说,这一领域主要有三个问题:(1)使用动物表现语言技能的AIC设备的说法仍然模糊不清,并且已经提出了更简单的替代机制(例如联想学习);(2)这种方法可能不合适,因为一些理论认为AIC设备接口的生态相关性不足以促进有意义的使用;(3)数据可能被认为是可疑的,因为实验者的潜在线索和缺乏系统性的报告培训和绩效。尽管存在这样的争议——这最终导致了该领域在20世纪最后25年左右的衰落——但这项研究也取得了重要的成功,比如圈养动物福利的改善,其结果为未来的物种间交流工作带来了希望。本文分类于:语言学>语言演化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Augmentative Interspecies Communication devices in animal language studies: A review.

Countless discussions have been generated by the animal language studies, specifically those utilizing mechanical interfaces, termed here Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC) devices (e.g., lexigrams; magnetic chips; keyboards). Overall, three concerns dominate the field: (1) claims that AIC device using animals manifest linguistic skills remain nebulous, and simpler alternative mechanisms have been proposed (e.g., associative learning); (2) such methodology may be unsuitable as some theorize AIC device interfaces are not sufficiently ecologically relevant to foster meaningful use; (3) data may be considered dubious due to potential cueing from experimenters and lack of systematicity in reporting training and performance. Despite such controversy-which eventually led to the field's deterioration around the last quarter of the twentieth century-this research also saw important successes, such as improvements in captive animal welfare, the outcomes of which hold promise for future interspecies communication work. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Evolution of Language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
The Multiple Dimensions of Familiarity: From Representations to Phenomenology. Compositionality in perception: A framework. An update of the development of motor behavior. Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience. Catching Mind Wandering With Pupillometry: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1