[德国胸外科学会关于非小细胞肺癌分段切除术的德尔菲专家共识]。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2099-5793
Aris Koryllos, Stefanie Veit, Olaf Schega, Gunda Leschber, Corinna Ludwig
{"title":"[德国胸外科学会关于非小细胞肺癌分段切除术的德尔菲专家共识]。","authors":"Aris Koryllos, Stefanie Veit, Olaf Schega, Gunda Leschber, Corinna Ludwig","doi":"10.1055/a-2099-5793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Findings from two recently published randomised controlled trials have shown favourable oncological results of segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC < 2 cm. This has generated a growing interest in this procedure, which is however considered technically more challenging than lobectomy. The aim of the working group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) was to address, via an expert consensus project, topics concerning implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assigned group of the DGT designed and conducted two electronic rounds of questions in all major thoracic and lung cancer centres in Germany. The steering group predefined a priori the threshold of consensus of 75% or greater. The results were discussed in an expert meeting, leading to a final Delphi poll for selected topics and questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight questions on segmentectomy for NSCLC were proposed in two rounds and voted on. After the final Delphi process, a consensus was reached for the following topics: non-inferiority of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for tumours < 2 cm, segmentectomy as an alternative if lobectomy is functionally not feasible, use of intraoperative techniques for identification of intersegmental borders. No consensus could be reached for topics such as frozen section for intraoperative ascertainment of radicality, as also for the indication of a re-do lobectomy in case of an occult N1 lymph node status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our manuscript depicts the results of a Delphi process in 2020/2021 involving experts of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on the implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer patients. In general, a very high rate of consensus was documented for the majority of the topics concerning the indication and execution of lung segmentectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23956,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Delphi Expert Consensus of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on Segmentectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Aris Koryllos, Stefanie Veit, Olaf Schega, Gunda Leschber, Corinna Ludwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2099-5793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Findings from two recently published randomised controlled trials have shown favourable oncological results of segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC < 2 cm. This has generated a growing interest in this procedure, which is however considered technically more challenging than lobectomy. The aim of the working group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) was to address, via an expert consensus project, topics concerning implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assigned group of the DGT designed and conducted two electronic rounds of questions in all major thoracic and lung cancer centres in Germany. The steering group predefined a priori the threshold of consensus of 75% or greater. The results were discussed in an expert meeting, leading to a final Delphi poll for selected topics and questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight questions on segmentectomy for NSCLC were proposed in two rounds and voted on. After the final Delphi process, a consensus was reached for the following topics: non-inferiority of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for tumours < 2 cm, segmentectomy as an alternative if lobectomy is functionally not feasible, use of intraoperative techniques for identification of intersegmental borders. No consensus could be reached for topics such as frozen section for intraoperative ascertainment of radicality, as also for the indication of a re-do lobectomy in case of an occult N1 lymph node status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our manuscript depicts the results of a Delphi process in 2020/2021 involving experts of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on the implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer patients. In general, a very high rate of consensus was documented for the majority of the topics concerning the indication and execution of lung segmentectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2099-5793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2099-5793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近发表的两项随机对照试验结果表明,对早期 NSCLC 进行分段切除术具有良好的肿瘤效果:DGT 的指定小组设计并在德国所有主要胸腔和肺癌中心进行了两轮电子提问。指导小组事先设定了 75% 或更高的共识阈值。专家会议对结果进行了讨论,最终对选定的主题和问题进行了德尔菲投票:经过两轮投票,共提出了 38 个有关 NSCLC 分部切除术的问题。经过最后的德尔菲程序,就以下主题达成了共识:肿瘤分段切除术与肿瘤叶切除术的非劣效性 结论:我们的手稿描述了 2020/2021 年德尔菲程序的结果,德国胸外科学会的专家参与了该程序,讨论了肺癌患者分段切除术的实施问题。总体而言,关于肺段切除术的适应症和实施的大部分主题都达成了非常高的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Delphi Expert Consensus of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on Segmentectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Background: Findings from two recently published randomised controlled trials have shown favourable oncological results of segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC < 2 cm. This has generated a growing interest in this procedure, which is however considered technically more challenging than lobectomy. The aim of the working group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) was to address, via an expert consensus project, topics concerning implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer surgery.

Methods: The assigned group of the DGT designed and conducted two electronic rounds of questions in all major thoracic and lung cancer centres in Germany. The steering group predefined a priori the threshold of consensus of 75% or greater. The results were discussed in an expert meeting, leading to a final Delphi poll for selected topics and questions.

Results: Thirty-eight questions on segmentectomy for NSCLC were proposed in two rounds and voted on. After the final Delphi process, a consensus was reached for the following topics: non-inferiority of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for tumours < 2 cm, segmentectomy as an alternative if lobectomy is functionally not feasible, use of intraoperative techniques for identification of intersegmental borders. No consensus could be reached for topics such as frozen section for intraoperative ascertainment of radicality, as also for the indication of a re-do lobectomy in case of an occult N1 lymph node status.

Conclusion: Our manuscript depicts the results of a Delphi process in 2020/2021 involving experts of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery on the implementation of segmentectomy in lung cancer patients. In general, a very high rate of consensus was documented for the majority of the topics concerning the indication and execution of lung segmentectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Forschung und Praxis Das Zentralblatt für Chirurgie – alle Neuigkeiten aus der Allgemeinen, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.
期刊最新文献
[Correction: Chylothorax]. [Early Thoracic Endografting is Safe in Patients with Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection]. [Malperfusion after Aortic Dissection - Management and Techniques]. [Outpatient and "Admission-Substituting" Interventions in Vascular Surgery - What is Feasible and Where are the Limits? Previous and New Legal Requirements and their Implementation in Practice]. [Reduced Amputation Rate in Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome Since the Introduction of a Minimal-invasive Concept].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1