作为争吵理由的治疗决定

Q4 Medicine L'' Orthodontie française Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1684/orthodfr.2023.109
Aymeric Philibert
{"title":"作为争吵理由的治疗决定","authors":"Aymeric Philibert","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The therapeutic decision usually is a regalia prerogative of the practitioner. However it seems to be contested. Materials and Methods From three definition of sovereignty, given by classical author of political science and the observations of the current practices and needs (new attitude and need of the patients, changes in training’s methods, use of new numeric tools) is illustrated this phenomenon of the decisions making field’s degradation. Conclusion Without a resistance to all current form of concurrence in the field of therapeutic decision, a transformation of the profession of practitioner in dento-maxill-ofacial orthopedics on a simple executive or animator of the care process in this field is expected. The practitioner awareness and a reenforcement of the training resources could limit the impact.","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"94 1","pages":"233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The therapeutic decision as a reason of quarrel\",\"authors\":\"Aymeric Philibert\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The therapeutic decision usually is a regalia prerogative of the practitioner. However it seems to be contested. Materials and Methods From three definition of sovereignty, given by classical author of political science and the observations of the current practices and needs (new attitude and need of the patients, changes in training’s methods, use of new numeric tools) is illustrated this phenomenon of the decisions making field’s degradation. Conclusion Without a resistance to all current form of concurrence in the field of therapeutic decision, a transformation of the profession of practitioner in dento-maxill-ofacial orthopedics on a simple executive or animator of the care process in this field is expected. The practitioner awareness and a reenforcement of the training resources could limit the impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"233-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:治疗决定通常是医生的特权。然而,这似乎是有争议的。材料和方法:从经典政治学作者给出的主权的三个定义和对当前实践和需求的观察(患者的新态度和需求,培训方法的变化,新的数字工具的使用)来说明决策领域退化的这种现象。结论:在治疗决策领域,如果没有对所有当前形式的一致意见的抵制,预计牙颌面矫形外科医生的职业将转变为该领域护理过程的简单执行或动画师。从业者的意识和培训资源的加强可以限制影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The therapeutic decision as a reason of quarrel
Introduction The therapeutic decision usually is a regalia prerogative of the practitioner. However it seems to be contested. Materials and Methods From three definition of sovereignty, given by classical author of political science and the observations of the current practices and needs (new attitude and need of the patients, changes in training’s methods, use of new numeric tools) is illustrated this phenomenon of the decisions making field’s degradation. Conclusion Without a resistance to all current form of concurrence in the field of therapeutic decision, a transformation of the profession of practitioner in dento-maxill-ofacial orthopedics on a simple executive or animator of the care process in this field is expected. The practitioner awareness and a reenforcement of the training resources could limit the impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
期刊最新文献
Orofacial myofunctional reeducation assisted by a prefabricated reeducation appliance: towards a necessary paradigm shift The « patient casting »: a key decision in orthognathic surgery How to adapt orthodontic treatment for a patient with a general pathology? Review of the literature based on six scenarios that challenge the practitioner Simultaneous rehabilitation of the tongue and breathing: a physiological necessity Repousser les limites des possibilités de mise en place des canines incluses maxillaires ou mandibulaires avec le système simplifié CT8. Un entretien avec Daniel Chillès, Sylvia Riemenschneider-Chillès et Jean-Gabriel Chillès.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1