Saqr Alsakarneh, Fouad Jaber, Khalid Ahmed, Fares Ghanem, Wael T Mohammad, Mohamed K Ahmed, Mohamad Khaled Almujarkesh, Thomas Bierman, John Campbell, Yazan Abboud, Muhammad Shah Miran, John H Helzberg, Hassan M Ghoz
{"title":"肝硬化患者内窥镜逆行胆管造影结果的发生率和跨洲差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Saqr Alsakarneh, Fouad Jaber, Khalid Ahmed, Fares Ghanem, Wael T Mohammad, Mohamed K Ahmed, Mohamad Khaled Almujarkesh, Thomas Bierman, John Campbell, Yazan Abboud, Muhammad Shah Miran, John H Helzberg, Hassan M Ghoz","doi":"10.14740/gr1610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There are conflicting data on the frequency and variability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on the incidence of post-ERCP adverse events in cirrhotic patients and to examine the differences across continents. Methods We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies reporting adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis from conception to September 30, 2022. The random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and confidence intervals (CIs). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q-statistic (I2). Results Twenty-one studies that included 2,576 cirrhotic patients and 3,729 individual ERCPs were analyzed. The pooled overall rate of adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis was 16.98% (95% CI: 13.06-21.29%, P < 0.001, I2 = 86.55%). ERCPs performed in Asia had the highest ERCP adverse events with an overall complication rate of 19.90%, while the lowest overall adverse events were in North America at 13.04%. The pooled post-ERCP bleeding, pancreatitis, cholangitis and perforation were 5.10% (95% CI: 3.33-7.19%, P < 0.001, I2 = 76.79%), 3.21% (95% CI: 2.20-5.36%, P = 0.03, I2 = 42.25%), 3.02% (95% CI: 1.19-5.52%, P < 0.001, I2 = 87.11%), and 0.12% (95% CI: 0.00 - 0.45, P = 0.26, I2 = 15.76%), respectively. The pooled post-ERCP mortality rate was 0.22% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85%, P = 0.01, I2 = 51.86%). Conclusions This meta-analysis shows that the overall complication rates after ERCP, bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are high in patients with cirrhosis. Because cirrhotic patients are more likely to have post-ERCP complications, with significant cross-continent variations, the risks and benefits of ERCP in this patient population should be carefully considered.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"16 2","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/65/gr-16-105.PMC10181340.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Cross-Continents Differences in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Outcomes Among Patients With Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Saqr Alsakarneh, Fouad Jaber, Khalid Ahmed, Fares Ghanem, Wael T Mohammad, Mohamed K Ahmed, Mohamad Khaled Almujarkesh, Thomas Bierman, John Campbell, Yazan Abboud, Muhammad Shah Miran, John H Helzberg, Hassan M Ghoz\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/gr1610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background There are conflicting data on the frequency and variability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on the incidence of post-ERCP adverse events in cirrhotic patients and to examine the differences across continents. Methods We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies reporting adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis from conception to September 30, 2022. The random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and confidence intervals (CIs). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q-statistic (I2). Results Twenty-one studies that included 2,576 cirrhotic patients and 3,729 individual ERCPs were analyzed. The pooled overall rate of adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis was 16.98% (95% CI: 13.06-21.29%, P < 0.001, I2 = 86.55%). ERCPs performed in Asia had the highest ERCP adverse events with an overall complication rate of 19.90%, while the lowest overall adverse events were in North America at 13.04%. The pooled post-ERCP bleeding, pancreatitis, cholangitis and perforation were 5.10% (95% CI: 3.33-7.19%, P < 0.001, I2 = 76.79%), 3.21% (95% CI: 2.20-5.36%, P = 0.03, I2 = 42.25%), 3.02% (95% CI: 1.19-5.52%, P < 0.001, I2 = 87.11%), and 0.12% (95% CI: 0.00 - 0.45, P = 0.26, I2 = 15.76%), respectively. The pooled post-ERCP mortality rate was 0.22% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85%, P = 0.01, I2 = 51.86%). Conclusions This meta-analysis shows that the overall complication rates after ERCP, bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are high in patients with cirrhosis. Because cirrhotic patients are more likely to have post-ERCP complications, with significant cross-continent variations, the risks and benefits of ERCP in this patient population should be carefully considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"105-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/65/gr-16-105.PMC10181340.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于肝硬化患者内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)结果的频率和可变性,有相互矛盾的数据。我们的目的是系统地回顾有关肝硬化患者ercp后不良事件发生率的文献,并检查各大洲之间的差异。方法:我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane数据库,以确定从受孕到2022年9月30日肝硬化患者ERCP后不良事件的研究报告。采用随机效应模型计算优势比(ORs)、平均差异(MDs)和置信区间(ci)。P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。采用Cochrane q统计量(I2)评估异质性。结果:21项研究包括2576名肝硬化患者和3729名个体ercp进行了分析。肝硬化患者ERCP术后不良事件总发生率为16.98% (95% CI: 13.06-21.29%, P < 0.001, I2 = 86.55%)。亚洲ERCP不良事件发生率最高,总并发症发生率为19.90%,而北美ERCP不良事件发生率最低,为13.04%。ercp术后合并出血、胰腺炎、胆管炎和穿孔分别为5.10% (95% CI: 3.33-7.19%, P < 0.001, I2 = 76.79%)、3.21% (95% CI: 2.20-5.36%, P = 0.03, I2 = 42.25%)、3.02% (95% CI: 1.19-5.52%, P < 0.001, I2 = 87.11%)和0.12% (95% CI: 0.00 - 0.45, P = 0.26, I2 = 15.76%)。ercp术后总死亡率为0.22% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85%, P = 0.01, I2 = 51.86%)。结论:本荟萃分析显示,肝硬化患者ERCP后的总并发症发生率、出血、胰腺炎和胆管炎较高。由于肝硬化患者更有可能出现ERCP后并发症,且存在显著的跨洲差异,因此应仔细考虑ERCP在该患者群体中的风险和益处。
Incidence and Cross-Continents Differences in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Outcomes Among Patients With Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background There are conflicting data on the frequency and variability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on the incidence of post-ERCP adverse events in cirrhotic patients and to examine the differences across continents. Methods We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies reporting adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis from conception to September 30, 2022. The random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and confidence intervals (CIs). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q-statistic (I2). Results Twenty-one studies that included 2,576 cirrhotic patients and 3,729 individual ERCPs were analyzed. The pooled overall rate of adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis was 16.98% (95% CI: 13.06-21.29%, P < 0.001, I2 = 86.55%). ERCPs performed in Asia had the highest ERCP adverse events with an overall complication rate of 19.90%, while the lowest overall adverse events were in North America at 13.04%. The pooled post-ERCP bleeding, pancreatitis, cholangitis and perforation were 5.10% (95% CI: 3.33-7.19%, P < 0.001, I2 = 76.79%), 3.21% (95% CI: 2.20-5.36%, P = 0.03, I2 = 42.25%), 3.02% (95% CI: 1.19-5.52%, P < 0.001, I2 = 87.11%), and 0.12% (95% CI: 0.00 - 0.45, P = 0.26, I2 = 15.76%), respectively. The pooled post-ERCP mortality rate was 0.22% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85%, P = 0.01, I2 = 51.86%). Conclusions This meta-analysis shows that the overall complication rates after ERCP, bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are high in patients with cirrhosis. Because cirrhotic patients are more likely to have post-ERCP complications, with significant cross-continent variations, the risks and benefits of ERCP in this patient population should be carefully considered.