Micheline L Chipman, Christine M Schreiber, Jamie M Fey, Susan J Lane, Chris DiLisio, Leah A Mallory
{"title":"跨专业参与:跨专业团队培训后汇报的混合方法研究。","authors":"Micheline L Chipman, Christine M Schreiber, Jamie M Fey, Susan J Lane, Chris DiLisio, Leah A Mallory","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation is an ideal tool for interprofessional (IP) team training. Debriefing after simulation is key to IP learning, although engagement and participation may be adversely influenced by cultural and hierarchical barriers. This mixed-methods study explored factors influencing learner engagement and participation in IP debriefing and the experience of \"silent but apparently engaged\" participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured profession-specific focus groups were conducted with participants from a weekly IP pediatric simulation program. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Eligible participants were assigned to \"silent\" or \"verbal\" groups according to observed behavior and received a questionnaire. Participants' self-rated engagement scores were compared using a t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six of 81 eligible participants were included, 13 completed a questionnaire, and 23 (8 physicians, 10 nursing staff, 4 pharmacists, 1 respiratory therapist) participated in 13 focus groups. Twenty-two subthemes were grouped into 6 themes: psychological safety, realism, distractors, stress, group characteristics, and facilitator behavior, with differences in perspective according to profession. Of the 36 respondents, 18 were \"silent\" and 18 \"verbal.\" Self-rated engagement scores differed between groups (3.65 vs. 4.17, P = 0.06); however, \"silent\" participants described themselves as engaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Themes identified that influenced learner engagement in debriefing included aspects of prebriefing and the simulation. Some aligned with general simulation best practices, such as psychological safety, prebriefing, and facilitator behavior. Findings unique to IP simulation included importance of realism to nonphysician professions, protecting time for training, group composition, and direct probing by cofacilitators to decrease physician bias and emphasize IP contributions. Silent participants reported engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"228-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement Across Professions: A Mixed Methods Study of Debriefing After Interprofessional Team Training.\",\"authors\":\"Micheline L Chipman, Christine M Schreiber, Jamie M Fey, Susan J Lane, Chris DiLisio, Leah A Mallory\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation is an ideal tool for interprofessional (IP) team training. Debriefing after simulation is key to IP learning, although engagement and participation may be adversely influenced by cultural and hierarchical barriers. This mixed-methods study explored factors influencing learner engagement and participation in IP debriefing and the experience of \\\"silent but apparently engaged\\\" participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured profession-specific focus groups were conducted with participants from a weekly IP pediatric simulation program. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Eligible participants were assigned to \\\"silent\\\" or \\\"verbal\\\" groups according to observed behavior and received a questionnaire. Participants' self-rated engagement scores were compared using a t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six of 81 eligible participants were included, 13 completed a questionnaire, and 23 (8 physicians, 10 nursing staff, 4 pharmacists, 1 respiratory therapist) participated in 13 focus groups. Twenty-two subthemes were grouped into 6 themes: psychological safety, realism, distractors, stress, group characteristics, and facilitator behavior, with differences in perspective according to profession. Of the 36 respondents, 18 were \\\"silent\\\" and 18 \\\"verbal.\\\" Self-rated engagement scores differed between groups (3.65 vs. 4.17, P = 0.06); however, \\\"silent\\\" participants described themselves as engaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Themes identified that influenced learner engagement in debriefing included aspects of prebriefing and the simulation. Some aligned with general simulation best practices, such as psychological safety, prebriefing, and facilitator behavior. Findings unique to IP simulation included importance of realism to nonphysician professions, protecting time for training, group composition, and direct probing by cofacilitators to decrease physician bias and emphasize IP contributions. Silent participants reported engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000736\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:模拟是跨专业(IP)团队培训的理想工具。模拟后的汇报是 IP 学习的关键,但文化和等级障碍可能会对学员的投入和参与产生不利影响。这项混合方法研究探讨了影响学员投入和参与 IP 汇报的因素,以及 "沉默但表面上参与 "的学员的经历:方法:与每周 IP 儿科模拟项目的参与者进行了半结构化的专业焦点小组讨论。对焦点小组进行了记录、转录和主题分析。根据观察到的行为,将符合条件的参与者分配到 "沉默 "组或 "言语 "组,并向他们发放调查问卷。使用 t 检验比较参与者的自评参与度得分:在 81 名符合条件的参与者中,有 36 人被纳入其中,13 人填写了调查问卷,23 人(8 名医生、10 名护理人员、4 名药剂师、1 名呼吸治疗师)参加了 13 个焦点小组。22 个子主题被归纳为 6 个主题:心理安全、现实主义、干扰因素、压力、小组特征和主持人行为,不同职业的观点存在差异。在 36 位受访者中,18 位是 "沉默型",18 位是 "言语型"。两组参与者的自我评价参与度得分不同(3.65 vs. 4.17,P = 0.06);但是,"沉默 "的参与者认为自己参与度高:结论:影响学员参与汇报的主题包括汇报前和模拟的各个方面。其中一些主题与一般的模拟最佳实践相一致,如心理安全、汇报前和主持人的行为。知识产权模拟的独特发现包括对非医生专业的现实主义的重要性、保护培训时间、小组组成以及共同主持人的直接试探,以减少医生的偏见并强调知识产权的贡献。无声的参与者报告了参与情况。
Engagement Across Professions: A Mixed Methods Study of Debriefing After Interprofessional Team Training.
Introduction: Simulation is an ideal tool for interprofessional (IP) team training. Debriefing after simulation is key to IP learning, although engagement and participation may be adversely influenced by cultural and hierarchical barriers. This mixed-methods study explored factors influencing learner engagement and participation in IP debriefing and the experience of "silent but apparently engaged" participants.
Methods: Semistructured profession-specific focus groups were conducted with participants from a weekly IP pediatric simulation program. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Eligible participants were assigned to "silent" or "verbal" groups according to observed behavior and received a questionnaire. Participants' self-rated engagement scores were compared using a t test.
Results: Thirty-six of 81 eligible participants were included, 13 completed a questionnaire, and 23 (8 physicians, 10 nursing staff, 4 pharmacists, 1 respiratory therapist) participated in 13 focus groups. Twenty-two subthemes were grouped into 6 themes: psychological safety, realism, distractors, stress, group characteristics, and facilitator behavior, with differences in perspective according to profession. Of the 36 respondents, 18 were "silent" and 18 "verbal." Self-rated engagement scores differed between groups (3.65 vs. 4.17, P = 0.06); however, "silent" participants described themselves as engaged.
Conclusions: Themes identified that influenced learner engagement in debriefing included aspects of prebriefing and the simulation. Some aligned with general simulation best practices, such as psychological safety, prebriefing, and facilitator behavior. Findings unique to IP simulation included importance of realism to nonphysician professions, protecting time for training, group composition, and direct probing by cofacilitators to decrease physician bias and emphasize IP contributions. Silent participants reported engagement.
期刊介绍:
Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.