寻求治疗的抑郁症患者心理弹性的量表和干预措施:一项系统综述。

K Jayakrishnan, Arunjyoti Baruah, Pankaj Kumar, Athar Javeth
{"title":"寻求治疗的抑郁症患者心理弹性的量表和干预措施:一项系统综述。","authors":"K Jayakrishnan,&nbsp;Arunjyoti Baruah,&nbsp;Pankaj Kumar,&nbsp;Athar Javeth","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2023.31964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resilience is an ability of an individual to effectively adjust and thrive in adverse stressful conditions. Resilience has protective and compensatory effects against depression. Evaluating resilience clinically and modifying it among patients with depression hugely impacts their prognosis. We aimed to explore different clinical scales for measuring resilience as well as interventions used with an intent to improve resilience among patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed central, Biomed central, and google scholar, using relevant MeSH keywords. The population of interest were the patients who were clinically diagnosed with Bipolar or Unipolar Depression and the population were not restricted to any country. Clinical scales for evaluation and interventions for resilience among patients with depression were set as an outcome of the study. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), Quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and narrative reviews were considered relevant research designs for extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8689 articles were identified and 13 articles were included in the final review, which yielded five scales that have been identified and have been used to evaluate resilience among the patients who are clinically diagnosed with depression and six different interventions for building resilience among patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resilience-building interventions will not only act as a preventive measure against depression but also help in promoting recovery and sustaining remission after a depressive episode. Clinical evaluation of resilience and management will significantly support boosting emotional experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"12 2","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/5f/jcs-12-84.PMC10352640.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scales and Interventions for Resilience among Treatment-Seeking Patients with Depression: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"K Jayakrishnan,&nbsp;Arunjyoti Baruah,&nbsp;Pankaj Kumar,&nbsp;Athar Javeth\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcs.2023.31964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resilience is an ability of an individual to effectively adjust and thrive in adverse stressful conditions. Resilience has protective and compensatory effects against depression. Evaluating resilience clinically and modifying it among patients with depression hugely impacts their prognosis. We aimed to explore different clinical scales for measuring resilience as well as interventions used with an intent to improve resilience among patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed central, Biomed central, and google scholar, using relevant MeSH keywords. The population of interest were the patients who were clinically diagnosed with Bipolar or Unipolar Depression and the population were not restricted to any country. Clinical scales for evaluation and interventions for resilience among patients with depression were set as an outcome of the study. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), Quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and narrative reviews were considered relevant research designs for extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8689 articles were identified and 13 articles were included in the final review, which yielded five scales that have been identified and have been used to evaluate resilience among the patients who are clinically diagnosed with depression and six different interventions for building resilience among patients with depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resilience-building interventions will not only act as a preventive measure against depression but also help in promoting recovery and sustaining remission after a depressive episode. Clinical evaluation of resilience and management will significantly support boosting emotional experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"84-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/5f/jcs-12-84.PMC10352640.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2023.31964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2023.31964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:弹性是一个人在不利的压力条件下有效调整和茁壮成长的能力。适应力对抑郁有保护和补偿作用。临床评估和调整抑郁症患者的心理弹性对其预后有很大影响。我们的目的是探索不同的临床量表来测量心理弹性,以及用于改善抑郁症患者心理弹性的干预措施。方法:通过检索PubMed central、Biomed central和google scholar,使用相关MeSH关键词进行系统文献综述。研究对象是临床诊断为双相或单相抑郁症的患者,研究对象不限于任何国家。作为研究的结果,我们设定了抑郁症患者心理弹性的临床评估量表和干预措施。随机对照试验(rct)、准实验研究、观察性研究和叙述性综述被认为是提取的相关研究设计。结果:共识别8689篇文章,最终纳入13篇文章,产生了5个已识别并已用于评估临床诊断为抑郁症的患者心理弹性的量表,以及6种不同的抑郁症患者心理弹性构建干预措施。结论:恢复力建设干预不仅可以作为预防抑郁症的措施,而且有助于促进抑郁症发作后的恢复和持续缓解。心理弹性和管理的临床评估将显著支持情绪体验的提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scales and Interventions for Resilience among Treatment-Seeking Patients with Depression: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Resilience is an ability of an individual to effectively adjust and thrive in adverse stressful conditions. Resilience has protective and compensatory effects against depression. Evaluating resilience clinically and modifying it among patients with depression hugely impacts their prognosis. We aimed to explore different clinical scales for measuring resilience as well as interventions used with an intent to improve resilience among patients with depression.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed central, Biomed central, and google scholar, using relevant MeSH keywords. The population of interest were the patients who were clinically diagnosed with Bipolar or Unipolar Depression and the population were not restricted to any country. Clinical scales for evaluation and interventions for resilience among patients with depression were set as an outcome of the study. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), Quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and narrative reviews were considered relevant research designs for extraction.

Results: A total of 8689 articles were identified and 13 articles were included in the final review, which yielded five scales that have been identified and have been used to evaluate resilience among the patients who are clinically diagnosed with depression and six different interventions for building resilience among patients with depression.

Conclusion: Resilience-building interventions will not only act as a preventive measure against depression but also help in promoting recovery and sustaining remission after a depressive episode. Clinical evaluation of resilience and management will significantly support boosting emotional experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Seeking Psychological Help Associated to Self-Stigma and Perceived Social Stigma Effectiveness of Swallowing and Oral Care Interventions on Oral Intake and Salivary Flow of Patients Following Endotracheal Extubation at a Tertiary Care Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial Abnormal Burnout of Nurses in Crisis; Double Pressure of Low Support and Competence Psychometric Assessment of Infant Colic Scale in Iranian Population Novel Memories of Motherhood: Childbirth Lived Experiences of Mothers with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1