七氟醚和丙泊酚对颅脑损伤患者术后早期神经功能恢复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Q2 Medicine Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.24920/004188
Bei Wu , Wan-Qing Song , Jin-Qian Dong , Hong-Li Yue , Yu Lu , Yun Yu , Shu-Yu Hao , Bai-Yun Liu , Wei-Hua Cui
{"title":"七氟醚和丙泊酚对颅脑损伤患者术后早期神经功能恢复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Bei Wu ,&nbsp;Wan-Qing Song ,&nbsp;Jin-Qian Dong ,&nbsp;Hong-Li Yue ,&nbsp;Yu Lu ,&nbsp;Yun Yu ,&nbsp;Shu-Yu Hao ,&nbsp;Bai-Yun Liu ,&nbsp;Wei-Hua Cui","doi":"10.24920/004188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on neurological recovery of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the early postoperative stage.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of TBI patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to analyze effects of propofol and sevoflurane on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on postoperative days 1,3, and 7. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze effects of the two anesthetics on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 340 TBI patients were enrolled in this study. There were 110 TBI patients who underwent craniotomy including 75 in the propofol group and 35 in the sevoflurane group, and 134 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy including 63 in the propofol group and 71 in the sevoflurane group. It showed no significant difference in GCS at admission between the propofol and the sevoflurane groups among craniotomy patients (<em>β</em> = 0.75, 95%<em>CI</em>: –0.55 to 2.05, <em>p</em> = 0.260). However, elevation in GCS from baseline was 1.73 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –2.81 to –0.66, <em>p</em> = 0.002) less in the sevoflurane group than that in the propofol group on postoperative day 1, 2.03 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –3.14 to –0.91, <em>p &lt;</em> 0.001) less on day 3, and 1.31 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –2.43 to –0.19, <em>p</em> = 0.022) less on day 7. The risk of unfavorable GOS (GOS 1,2, and 3) at discharge was higher in the sevoflurane group (<em>OR</em> = 4.93, 95%<em>CI</em>: 1.05 to 23.03, <em>p</em> = 0.043). No significant difference was observed among two-group decompressive craniectomy patients in GCS and GOS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to propofol, sevoflurane was associated with worse neurological recovery during the hospital stay in TBI patients undergoing craniotomy. This difference was not detected in TBI patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":"38 2","pages":"Pages 97-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Neurological Recovery of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Early Postoperative Stage: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Bei Wu ,&nbsp;Wan-Qing Song ,&nbsp;Jin-Qian Dong ,&nbsp;Hong-Li Yue ,&nbsp;Yu Lu ,&nbsp;Yun Yu ,&nbsp;Shu-Yu Hao ,&nbsp;Bai-Yun Liu ,&nbsp;Wei-Hua Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.24920/004188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on neurological recovery of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the early postoperative stage.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of TBI patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to analyze effects of propofol and sevoflurane on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on postoperative days 1,3, and 7. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze effects of the two anesthetics on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 340 TBI patients were enrolled in this study. There were 110 TBI patients who underwent craniotomy including 75 in the propofol group and 35 in the sevoflurane group, and 134 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy including 63 in the propofol group and 71 in the sevoflurane group. It showed no significant difference in GCS at admission between the propofol and the sevoflurane groups among craniotomy patients (<em>β</em> = 0.75, 95%<em>CI</em>: –0.55 to 2.05, <em>p</em> = 0.260). However, elevation in GCS from baseline was 1.73 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –2.81 to –0.66, <em>p</em> = 0.002) less in the sevoflurane group than that in the propofol group on postoperative day 1, 2.03 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –3.14 to –0.91, <em>p &lt;</em> 0.001) less on day 3, and 1.31 points (95%<em>CI</em>: –2.43 to –0.19, <em>p</em> = 0.022) less on day 7. The risk of unfavorable GOS (GOS 1,2, and 3) at discharge was higher in the sevoflurane group (<em>OR</em> = 4.93, 95%<em>CI</em>: 1.05 to 23.03, <em>p</em> = 0.043). No significant difference was observed among two-group decompressive craniectomy patients in GCS and GOS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to propofol, sevoflurane was associated with worse neurological recovery during the hospital stay in TBI patients undergoing craniotomy. This difference was not detected in TBI patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 97-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929423000263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929423000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨丙泊酚和七氟醚对颅脑损伤患者术后早期神经功能恢复的影响。方法回顾性分析经开颅或减压开颅手术治疗的脑外伤患者的临床资料。采用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析丙泊酚和七氟醚对术后第1、3和7天格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的影响。采用多元回归分析法分析两种麻醉剂对出院时格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)的影响。结果本研究共纳入340例创伤性脑损伤患者。有110名TBI患者接受了开颅手术,其中丙泊酚组75名,七氟醚组35名,134名患者接受了颅骨减压手术,其中异丙酚组63名,七氟烷组71名。开颅手术患者入院时,丙泊酚组和七氟醚组的GCS无显著差异(β=0.75,95%CI:0.55-2.05,P=0.260)。然而,七氟醚组术后第1天的GCS比丙泊酚组低1.73分(95%CI-2.81--0.66,P=0.002),第3天减少2.03分(95%可信区间:-3.14至-0.91,P<0.001),第7天减少1.31分(95%置信区间:-2.43至-0.19,P=0.022)。七氟醚组在出院时发生不良GOS(GOS 1、2和3)的风险更高(OR=4.93,95%CI:1.05至23.03,P=0.043)。两组开颅减压患者的GCS和GOS没有显著差异。结论与丙泊酚相比,在接受开颅手术的TBI患者住院期间,七氟醚与较差的神经恢复有关。在接受减压颅骨切除术的TBI患者中没有发现这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Neurological Recovery of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Early Postoperative Stage: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To investigate the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on neurological recovery of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the early postoperative stage.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of TBI patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to analyze effects of propofol and sevoflurane on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on postoperative days 1,3, and 7. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze effects of the two anesthetics on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge.

Results

A total of 340 TBI patients were enrolled in this study. There were 110 TBI patients who underwent craniotomy including 75 in the propofol group and 35 in the sevoflurane group, and 134 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy including 63 in the propofol group and 71 in the sevoflurane group. It showed no significant difference in GCS at admission between the propofol and the sevoflurane groups among craniotomy patients (β = 0.75, 95%CI: –0.55 to 2.05, p = 0.260). However, elevation in GCS from baseline was 1.73 points (95%CI: –2.81 to –0.66, p = 0.002) less in the sevoflurane group than that in the propofol group on postoperative day 1, 2.03 points (95%CI: –3.14 to –0.91, p < 0.001) less on day 3, and 1.31 points (95%CI: –2.43 to –0.19, p = 0.022) less on day 7. The risk of unfavorable GOS (GOS 1,2, and 3) at discharge was higher in the sevoflurane group (OR = 4.93, 95%CI: 1.05 to 23.03, p = 0.043). No significant difference was observed among two-group decompressive craniectomy patients in GCS and GOS.

Conclusions

Compared to propofol, sevoflurane was associated with worse neurological recovery during the hospital stay in TBI patients undergoing craniotomy. This difference was not detected in TBI patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
期刊最新文献
UBE2C as an Immune-Related Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Study Based on Multiple Databases Linggui Zhugan Decoction Improves High Glucose-Induced Autophagy in Podocytes Alignment Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where do We Stand Today? Vascular Calcification: Where is the Cure? BILL Strategy: Points to Consider During the Performance and Interpretation of Critical Care Echocardiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1