使用根管冲洗方案(即常规针头冲洗、PUI、PIPS和SWEEPS)进行单次根管治疗后疼痛评分降低的比较分析:一项随机对照试验。

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22
Neelam Mittal, Harakh Chand Baranwal, Sakshi Gupta, Thivya Shankari, Supriya Gupta, Shubham Kharat
{"title":"使用根管冲洗方案(即常规针头冲洗、PUI、PIPS和SWEEPS)进行单次根管治疗后疼痛评分降低的比较分析:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Neelam Mittal,&nbsp;Harakh Chand Baranwal,&nbsp;Sakshi Gupta,&nbsp;Thivya Shankari,&nbsp;Supriya Gupta,&nbsp;Shubham Kharat","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess the effects of different irrigation activation systems on postoperative pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), using new laser irrigation activation system shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques, compared with the conventional irrigation (CI) method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty patients suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary or mandibular molars were enrolled and randomly assigned to four different irrigation activation groups (<i>n</i> = 15) after chemomechanical root canal preparation. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were recorded using VAS. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that mean pain scores decreased with time in all patients in all groups. The decrease in pain score was found to be statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) among both the genders in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 4 (SWEEPS). Postoperatively, pain scores decreased significantly using Group 4 (SWEEPS), followed by Group 3 (PIPS), Group 2 (ultrasonic activation), and Group 1 (conventional needle irrigation). No significant relation was observed statistically between pain scores and age groups among all groups, except for preoperative score in Group 3 and age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative scores were lower in laser-activated irrigation systems as compared to the other activation systems. The highest pain scores were observed in case of CI method, at pre- and post-operative periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 2","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190097/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of reduction in pain scores after single visit root canal treatment using endodontic irrigation protocols, namely, Conventional needle irrigation, PUI, PIPS and SWEEPS: A randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Neelam Mittal,&nbsp;Harakh Chand Baranwal,&nbsp;Sakshi Gupta,&nbsp;Thivya Shankari,&nbsp;Supriya Gupta,&nbsp;Shubham Kharat\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess the effects of different irrigation activation systems on postoperative pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), using new laser irrigation activation system shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques, compared with the conventional irrigation (CI) method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty patients suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary or mandibular molars were enrolled and randomly assigned to four different irrigation activation groups (<i>n</i> = 15) after chemomechanical root canal preparation. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were recorded using VAS. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that mean pain scores decreased with time in all patients in all groups. The decrease in pain score was found to be statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) among both the genders in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 4 (SWEEPS). Postoperatively, pain scores decreased significantly using Group 4 (SWEEPS), followed by Group 3 (PIPS), Group 2 (ultrasonic activation), and Group 1 (conventional needle irrigation). No significant relation was observed statistically between pain scores and age groups among all groups, except for preoperative score in Group 3 and age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative scores were lower in laser-activated irrigation systems as compared to the other activation systems. The highest pain scores were observed in case of CI method, at pre- and post-operative periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"143-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、新型激光冲洗激活系统冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)、光子诱导光声流、被动超声冲洗激活技术,与传统冲洗(CI)方法进行比较,评估不同冲洗激活系统对术后疼痛的影响。材料和方法:60例上颌或下颌磨牙症状性不可逆牙髓炎患者在化学机械根管预备后被随机分为四个不同的冲洗激活组(n=15)。使用VAS记录术前和术后疼痛评分。收集数据并使用IBM SPSS 20.0软件进行统计学分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果:我们观察到,所有组中所有患者的平均疼痛评分都随着时间的推移而下降。在第3组(PIPS)和第4组(SWEEPS)中,疼痛评分的下降在性别之间具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,使用第4组(SWEEPS),疼痛评分显著降低,其次是第3组(PIPS)、第2组(超声激活)和第1组(常规针头冲洗)。除了第3组和年龄组的术前评分外,所有组的疼痛评分与年龄组之间没有统计学上的显著关系。结论:与其他激活系统相比,激光激活灌溉系统的术后评分较低。在CI法的情况下,在术前和术后阶段观察到最高的疼痛评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of reduction in pain scores after single visit root canal treatment using endodontic irrigation protocols, namely, Conventional needle irrigation, PUI, PIPS and SWEEPS: A randomized control trial.

Introduction: To assess the effects of different irrigation activation systems on postoperative pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), using new laser irrigation activation system shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques, compared with the conventional irrigation (CI) method.

Materials and methods: Sixty patients suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary or mandibular molars were enrolled and randomly assigned to four different irrigation activation groups (n = 15) after chemomechanical root canal preparation. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were recorded using VAS. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.

Results: We observed that mean pain scores decreased with time in all patients in all groups. The decrease in pain score was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) among both the genders in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 4 (SWEEPS). Postoperatively, pain scores decreased significantly using Group 4 (SWEEPS), followed by Group 3 (PIPS), Group 2 (ultrasonic activation), and Group 1 (conventional needle irrigation). No significant relation was observed statistically between pain scores and age groups among all groups, except for preoperative score in Group 3 and age groups.

Conclusion: Postoperative scores were lower in laser-activated irrigation systems as compared to the other activation systems. The highest pain scores were observed in case of CI method, at pre- and post-operative periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Adding Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the Porosity of Calcium Hydroxide Determination of gamma radiation sterilization dose on bioceramic BCP-Sr-Ag as bone graft according to ISO 11137 standards Compressive strength of nanohybrid composite resin after the application of glycerin immersed in fermented milk Differences in the solubility of CaCO3 from blood clam shells and Ca(OH)2 as a candidate pulp capping material Effective Dose of Nano Propolis as Anti-Pain in Animal Models of Mus Musculus Using Writhing Test Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1