Moses技术是否提高了标准钬激光碎石术的效率和效果?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2022.156
Carlos A Riveros, Victor Chalfant, Thomas Melchart, Gurjot Singh, Ana M Forero, Braian Ledesma, Susan Harnett, Andrew A Stec, Michael Feloney, Joan C Delto, Dane E Klett
{"title":"Moses技术是否提高了标准钬激光碎石术的效率和效果?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carlos A Riveros,&nbsp;Victor Chalfant,&nbsp;Thomas Melchart,&nbsp;Gurjot Singh,&nbsp;Ana M Forero,&nbsp;Braian Ledesma,&nbsp;Susan Harnett,&nbsp;Andrew A Stec,&nbsp;Michael Feloney,&nbsp;Joan C Delto,&nbsp;Dane E Klett","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2022.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy (HLL) is a standard treatment for urolithiasis. Moses technology has been shown to improve fragmentation efficiency in vitro; however, it is still unclear how it performs clinically compared to standard HLL. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the differences in efficiency and outcomes between Moses mode and standard HLL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing Moses mode and standard HLL in adults with urolithiasis. Outcomes of interest included operative (operation, fragmentation, and lasing times; total energy used; and ablation speed) and perioperative parameters (stone-free rate and overall complication rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified six studies eligible for analysis. Compared to standard HLL, Moses was associated with significantly shorter average lasing time (mean difference [MD] -0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.22 to -0.69 minutes), faster stone ablation speed (MD 30.45, 95% CI 11.56-49.33 mm<sup>3</sup>/min), and higher energy used (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.33-1.76 kJ). Moses and standard HLL were not significantly different in terms of operation (MD -9.89, 95% CI -25.14 to 5.37 minutes) and fragmentation times (MD -1.71, 95% CI -11.81 to 8.38 minutes), as well as stone-free (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.49) and overall complication rates (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While perioperative outcomes were equivalent between Moses and standard HLL, Moses was associated with faster lasing time and stone ablation speeds at the expense of higher energy usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"75 4","pages":"409-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/e9/CEJU-75-156.PMC9903166.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Moses technology improve the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A Riveros,&nbsp;Victor Chalfant,&nbsp;Thomas Melchart,&nbsp;Gurjot Singh,&nbsp;Ana M Forero,&nbsp;Braian Ledesma,&nbsp;Susan Harnett,&nbsp;Andrew A Stec,&nbsp;Michael Feloney,&nbsp;Joan C Delto,&nbsp;Dane E Klett\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2022.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy (HLL) is a standard treatment for urolithiasis. Moses technology has been shown to improve fragmentation efficiency in vitro; however, it is still unclear how it performs clinically compared to standard HLL. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the differences in efficiency and outcomes between Moses mode and standard HLL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing Moses mode and standard HLL in adults with urolithiasis. Outcomes of interest included operative (operation, fragmentation, and lasing times; total energy used; and ablation speed) and perioperative parameters (stone-free rate and overall complication rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified six studies eligible for analysis. Compared to standard HLL, Moses was associated with significantly shorter average lasing time (mean difference [MD] -0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.22 to -0.69 minutes), faster stone ablation speed (MD 30.45, 95% CI 11.56-49.33 mm<sup>3</sup>/min), and higher energy used (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.33-1.76 kJ). Moses and standard HLL were not significantly different in terms of operation (MD -9.89, 95% CI -25.14 to 5.37 minutes) and fragmentation times (MD -1.71, 95% CI -11.81 to 8.38 minutes), as well as stone-free (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.49) and overall complication rates (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While perioperative outcomes were equivalent between Moses and standard HLL, Moses was associated with faster lasing time and stone ablation speeds at the expense of higher energy usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"409-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/e9/CEJU-75-156.PMC9903166.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导读:逆行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术(HLL)是治疗尿石症的标准方法。Moses技术已被证明可以提高体外破碎效率;然而,与标准HLL相比,其临床表现尚不清楚。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估Moses模式和标准HLL之间的效率和结果差异。材料和方法:我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中比较Moses模式和标准HLL在成人尿石症患者中的随机临床试验和队列研究。关注的结果包括手术(手术、碎片和激光时间);使用的总能源;消融速度)和围手术期参数(结石游离率和总并发症发生率)。结果:检索确定了6项符合分析条件的研究。与标准HLL相比,Moses与较短的平均激光时间(平均差[MD] -0.95, 95%可信区间[CI] -1.22至-0.69分钟)、更快的结石消融速度(MD 30.45, 95% CI 11.56-49.33 mm3/min)和较高的能量消耗(MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.33-1.76 kJ)相关。Moses和标准HLL在手术(MD -9.89, 95% CI -25.14至5.37分钟)、碎裂时间(MD -1.71, 95% CI -11.81至8.38分钟)、无结石(优势比[OR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.49)和总并发症发生率(OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.17)方面无显著差异。结论:虽然Moses和标准HLL的围手术期结果相当,但Moses与更快的激光时间和更快的结石消融速度相关,但以更高的能量消耗为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Moses technology improve the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Retrograde ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy (HLL) is a standard treatment for urolithiasis. Moses technology has been shown to improve fragmentation efficiency in vitro; however, it is still unclear how it performs clinically compared to standard HLL. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the differences in efficiency and outcomes between Moses mode and standard HLL.

Material and methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing Moses mode and standard HLL in adults with urolithiasis. Outcomes of interest included operative (operation, fragmentation, and lasing times; total energy used; and ablation speed) and perioperative parameters (stone-free rate and overall complication rate).

Results: The search identified six studies eligible for analysis. Compared to standard HLL, Moses was associated with significantly shorter average lasing time (mean difference [MD] -0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.22 to -0.69 minutes), faster stone ablation speed (MD 30.45, 95% CI 11.56-49.33 mm3/min), and higher energy used (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.33-1.76 kJ). Moses and standard HLL were not significantly different in terms of operation (MD -9.89, 95% CI -25.14 to 5.37 minutes) and fragmentation times (MD -1.71, 95% CI -11.81 to 8.38 minutes), as well as stone-free (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.49) and overall complication rates (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.17).

Conclusions: While perioperative outcomes were equivalent between Moses and standard HLL, Moses was associated with faster lasing time and stone ablation speeds at the expense of higher energy usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Transperitoneal single-port robotic Firefly-guided bladder diverticulectomy and simple prostatectomy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterolithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy challenges in managing spinal cord neuropathy patients. Lessons learned from a scoping review. Robotic left nephrectomy with level IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the AngioVac system. Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse. The role of gel-infused translabial ultrasound as a new modality in evaluation of female urethral stricture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1