{"title":"Scopus和Web of Science之间的差异，医学期刊文章中资助信息的覆盖范围:一项后续研究。","authors":"Peter Kokol","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2023.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The number of all funded articles published in 2021 was identified in WoS and Scopus bibliographic databases using bibliometric analysis on a sample of 52 prestigious medical journals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the number of funded articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus and WoS due to substantial differences in the number of funded articles between some single journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to significant differences in the number of funded articles indexed in WoS and Scopus, which might be attributed to the different protocols for handling funding data in WoS and Scopus, we would still advise using both databases to obtain and analyze funding information.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"111 3","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361553/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Kokol\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/jmla.2023.1513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The number of all funded articles published in 2021 was identified in WoS and Scopus bibliographic databases using bibliometric analysis on a sample of 52 prestigious medical journals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the number of funded articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus and WoS due to substantial differences in the number of funded articles between some single journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to significant differences in the number of funded articles indexed in WoS and Scopus, which might be attributed to the different protocols for handling funding data in WoS and Scopus, we would still advise using both databases to obtain and analyze funding information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Library Association\",\"volume\":\"111 3\",\"pages\":\"703-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Library Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:本后续研究旨在确定2015 - 2021年Web of Science Core Collection (WoS)和Scopus中资助信息的覆盖范围是否发生了变化，以及发生了怎样的变化。方法:采用文献计量学分析方法，在WoS和Scopus书目数据库中确定2021年发表的所有资助文章的数量。结果:对有资助信息的资助文章数量的分析显示，由于某些单一期刊之间的资助文章数量存在较大差异，Scopus与WoS的差异具有统计学意义。结论:由于在WoS和Scopus中检索的资助文章数量存在显著差异，这可能是由于WoS和Scopus中处理资助数据的协议不同所致，我们仍然建议使用这两个数据库来获取和分析资助信息。
Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study.
Objective: This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021.
Methods: The number of all funded articles published in 2021 was identified in WoS and Scopus bibliographic databases using bibliometric analysis on a sample of 52 prestigious medical journals.
Results: The analysis of the number of funded articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus and WoS due to substantial differences in the number of funded articles between some single journals.
Conclusion: Due to significant differences in the number of funded articles indexed in WoS and Scopus, which might be attributed to the different protocols for handling funding data in WoS and Scopus, we would still advise using both databases to obtain and analyze funding information.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
