Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2211
Megan Jaskowiak, Michelle Nielsen Ott, Karina Kletscher
Objectives: This study examines the experiences of librarians who support physician assistant/associate (PA) programs, describing the unique challenges of these programs and outlining strategies that librarians adopt to engage these programs.
Method: This mixed-methods study includes two phases: (1) a quantitative survey developed and distributed to library personnel in institutions with established or developing PA programs in the US and Canada, and (2) semi-structured interviews with fifteen selected survey respondents, focusing on their experiences and perceptions related to PA education support. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: Seventy-five survey responses were collected. Key findings from the survey include: most respondents were from universities with health sciences programs, with nursing and physical therapy being the most common additional programs. Most library-led instruction occurred during the didactic phase and focused on search skills and evidence-based practice. PubMed and UpToDate were the most library-promoted resources. Two thematic elements discovered through the semi-structured interviews were "relationship building as paramount" and "impact of the learning curve on librarian workload."
Conclusion: Librarians who support PA educational programs face challenges related to relationship building, financial resources, workload, and steep learning curves. The findings underscore the need for targeted professional development programs to equip librarians with the necessary knowledge and skills.
{"title":"Navigating unique challenges: librarian perceptions in supporting physician associate (assistant) programs.","authors":"Megan Jaskowiak, Michelle Nielsen Ott, Karina Kletscher","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2211","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the experiences of librarians who support physician assistant/associate (PA) programs, describing the unique challenges of these programs and outlining strategies that librarians adopt to engage these programs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-methods study includes two phases: (1) a quantitative survey developed and distributed to library personnel in institutions with established or developing PA programs in the US and Canada, and (2) semi-structured interviews with fifteen selected survey respondents, focusing on their experiences and perceptions related to PA education support. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five survey responses were collected. Key findings from the survey include: most respondents were from universities with health sciences programs, with nursing and physical therapy being the most common additional programs. Most library-led instruction occurred during the didactic phase and focused on search skills and evidence-based practice. PubMed and UpToDate were the most library-promoted resources. Two thematic elements discovered through the semi-structured interviews were \"relationship building as paramount\" and \"impact of the learning curve on librarian workload.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Librarians who support PA educational programs face challenges related to relationship building, financial resources, workload, and steep learning curves. The findings underscore the need for targeted professional development programs to equip librarians with the necessary knowledge and skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947935/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
bims: Biomed News. February 5, 2017-Present. https://biomed.news/, Created by Thomas Krichel and directed by Gavin P. McStay. Free. Accessible via any web browser.
bims:生物医学新闻。2017年2月5日至今。https://biomed.news/,由Thomas Krichel创作,Gavin P. McStay导演。免费的。可通过任何网络浏览器访问。
{"title":"bims: Biomed News.","authors":"Farhad Shokraneh","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2288","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>bims: Biomed News</b>. February 5, 2017-Present. https://biomed.news/, Created by Thomas Krichel and directed by Gavin P. McStay. Free. Accessible via any web browser.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"79-82"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947930/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2165
Hey Young Rhee, Kiyon Rhew
Background: Non-healthcare undergraduate students frequently seek drug-related information online, often relying on unverified sources such as Google or YouTube. Early exposure to professional drug information databases may promote evidence-based information-seeking habits.
Case presentation: A one-hour training session on using Lexicomp, a professional drug information database, was conducted for 55 non-healthcare students and 58 pharmacy students at a women's university in South Korea. The session included live demonstrations and guided search tasks. Participants completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing their information-seeking behaviors, perceptions of source reliability, and intention to use Lexicomp. Students also ranked drug information types they typically searched for and anticipated using Lexicomp to find. Only 1.8% of non-healthcare students had prior knowledge of Lexicomp, compared to 100% of pharmacy students. After the training, 100% of non-healthcare students rated Lexicomp as more reliable than their usual sources, and over 90% expressed willingness to use it in the future. A marked shift in information-seeking priorities was observed, with greater emphasis on clinically relevant topics such as adverse effects and contraindications. Students reported increased confidence and found the platform easier to use than expected.
Conclusion: A brief educational intervention was effective in improving drug information literacy among non-healthcare students. Early training in professional resources may foster long-term adoption of evidence-based practices in personal health information use.
{"title":"Introducing professional drug information resources to non-healthcare undergraduates: a case report on promoting drug information literacy.","authors":"Hey Young Rhee, Kiyon Rhew","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2165","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-healthcare undergraduate students frequently seek drug-related information online, often relying on unverified sources such as Google or YouTube. Early exposure to professional drug information databases may promote evidence-based information-seeking habits.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A one-hour training session on using Lexicomp, a professional drug information database, was conducted for 55 non-healthcare students and 58 pharmacy students at a women's university in South Korea. The session included live demonstrations and guided search tasks. Participants completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing their information-seeking behaviors, perceptions of source reliability, and intention to use Lexicomp. Students also ranked drug information types they typically searched for and anticipated using Lexicomp to find. Only 1.8% of non-healthcare students had prior knowledge of Lexicomp, compared to 100% of pharmacy students. After the training, 100% of non-healthcare students rated Lexicomp as more reliable than their usual sources, and over 90% expressed willingness to use it in the future. A marked shift in information-seeking priorities was observed, with greater emphasis on clinically relevant topics such as adverse effects and contraindications. Students reported increased confidence and found the platform easier to use than expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A brief educational intervention was effective in improving drug information literacy among non-healthcare students. Early training in professional resources may foster long-term adoption of evidence-based practices in personal health information use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947924/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2125
Shanshan Li, Wei Jiang, Xiaoli Dai
Background: Numerous studies have emphasized the crucial role of library resources in improving educational outcomes. However, there is a significant gap in research on how vocational medical students, a key group in the healthcare workforce, utilize these resources. This gap in the research highlights the need to further investigate the unique challenges and factors influencing library resource utilization in vocational medical students.
Case presentation: One hundred and seventeen vocational medical students from a medical vocational college were assessed what influenced their library resource usage. An online survey was conducted to collect data on usage patterns, satisfaction with library resources, and satisfaction with self-reported retrieval abilities. The sample included 48 males and 69 females, with an average age of 19.1±0.7 years. Of the participants, 38.5% (45 students) reported effective library resource utilization. Lasso regression and logistic regression analyses identified two key predictors: satisfaction with library's space capacity (OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.438~12.622) and satisfaction with resource retrieval ability (OR 7.362, 95% CI 1.311~41.341). ROC analysis revealed a high predictive value, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.866 (95% CI 0.796~0.936).
Conclusions: This study identified satisfaction with library's space capacity and satisfaction with resource retrieval ability as key factors influencing library resource utilization by vocational medical students. To enhance library resource utilization, targeted strategies such as strengthening library infrastructure and improving students' information literacy should be considered.
背景:许多研究都强调图书馆资源在改善教育成果方面的关键作用。然而,关于职业医学生如何利用这些资源的研究存在重大差距,这是医疗保健劳动力的关键群体。这一研究的空白突出表明,有必要进一步调查影响高职医学生图书馆资源利用的独特挑战和因素。案例介绍:对某医学职业学院117名医学生进行了影响其图书馆资源使用的因素评估。进行了一项在线调查,以收集有关使用模式、对图书馆资源的满意度以及对自我报告的检索能力的满意度的数据。男性48人,女性69人,平均年龄19.1±0.7岁。在参与者中,38.5%(45名学生)报告有效地利用了图书馆资源。Lasso回归和logistic回归分析确定了两个关键预测因子:图书馆空间容量满意度(OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.438~12.622)和资源检索能力满意度(OR 7.362, 95% CI 1.311~41.341)。ROC分析显示预测值较高,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.866 (95% CI 0.796~0.936)。结论:本研究发现对图书馆空间容量的满意度和对资源检索能力的满意度是影响高职医学生图书馆资源利用的关键因素。提高图书馆资源利用率,应考虑加强图书馆基础设施建设、提高学生信息素养等有针对性的策略。
{"title":"What factors influence vocational medical students' self-perceived utilization of library resources?","authors":"Shanshan Li, Wei Jiang, Xiaoli Dai","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2125","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous studies have emphasized the crucial role of library resources in improving educational outcomes. However, there is a significant gap in research on how vocational medical students, a key group in the healthcare workforce, utilize these resources. This gap in the research highlights the need to further investigate the unique challenges and factors influencing library resource utilization in vocational medical students.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>One hundred and seventeen vocational medical students from a medical vocational college were assessed what influenced their library resource usage. An online survey was conducted to collect data on usage patterns, satisfaction with library resources, and satisfaction with self-reported retrieval abilities. The sample included 48 males and 69 females, with an average age of 19.1±0.7 years. Of the participants, 38.5% (45 students) reported effective library resource utilization. Lasso regression and logistic regression analyses identified two key predictors: satisfaction with library's space capacity (OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.438~12.622) and satisfaction with resource retrieval ability (OR 7.362, 95% CI 1.311~41.341). ROC analysis revealed a high predictive value, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.866 (95% CI 0.796~0.936).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified satisfaction with library's space capacity and satisfaction with resource retrieval ability as key factors influencing library resource utilization by vocational medical students. To enhance library resource utilization, targeted strategies such as strengthening library infrastructure and improving students' information literacy should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947934/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2056
Laura Lipke, Neyda Gilman
Background: Health sciences librarians frequently engage in discussions about the appropriate assignment of evidence synthesis reviews (ES) for graduate students as course, thesis, or capstone projects. Such reviews are often assigned to build the research skills needed in a clinical environment. In the assignment of these reviews, it has become apparent that health sciences faculty are often not familiar with required standardized methodologies. Incorrect methodologies can contribute to research waste and produce evidence that cannot be applied for its intended purpose.
Case presentation: Health sciences librarians at an R1 institution ventured to address the ES review knowledge gap through a continuing education webinar for health sciences faculty and graduate students. The webinar provided guidance on systematic review (SR) methodology, optional alternative research assignments, and discussions encouraging the use of these assignments. The alternative assignments were developed based on those presented by Lipke & Price (2025), each with specific learning objectives and grading rubrics. Pre- and post-webinar surveys were conducted to gauge any changes in participants' knowledge, skills, or abilities related to the presented information.
Conclusions: Study participants included six faculty and a graduate student. Survey results showed that participants had an improved understanding of, and placed increased importance on, ES method guidelines, with an equal understanding of the need for alternative assignments. The authors of this study will further evaluate the impact of this webinar and assess its effectiveness in changing health sciences research assignments.
{"title":"Changing minds and methods: providing health sciences faculty with alternatives to systematic reviews assignments.","authors":"Laura Lipke, Neyda Gilman","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2056","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health sciences librarians frequently engage in discussions about the appropriate assignment of evidence synthesis reviews (ES) for graduate students as course, thesis, or capstone projects. Such reviews are often assigned to build the research skills needed in a clinical environment. In the assignment of these reviews, it has become apparent that health sciences faculty are often not familiar with required standardized methodologies. Incorrect methodologies can contribute to research waste and produce evidence that cannot be applied for its intended purpose.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Health sciences librarians at an R1 institution ventured to address the ES review knowledge gap through a continuing education webinar for health sciences faculty and graduate students. The webinar provided guidance on systematic review (SR) methodology, optional alternative research assignments, and discussions encouraging the use of these assignments. The alternative assignments were developed based on those presented by Lipke & Price (2025), each with specific learning objectives and grading rubrics. Pre- and post-webinar surveys were conducted to gauge any changes in participants' knowledge, skills, or abilities related to the presented information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study participants included six faculty and a graduate student. Survey results showed that participants had an improved understanding of, and placed increased importance on, ES method guidelines, with an equal understanding of the need for alternative assignments. The authors of this study will further evaluate the impact of this webinar and assess its effectiveness in changing health sciences research assignments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947928/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2185
Erin Roga
Background: Knowledge syntheses require complex searches of the literature, but many have poor quality, irreproducible search methods. Academic libraries support researchers conducting knowledge syntheses in many ways, including providing training such as workshops. However, for training to be successful, effective teaching theories and methods need to be used, such as andragogy and instructional design. These can help to develop learning strategies and experiences based on the needs of the learners.
Case presentation: At Federation University Australia Library, in response to increasing requests for support from researchers conducting knowledge syntheses, a series of workshops on systematic searching was developed using adult learning methods. We aimed to deliver quality, engaging learning experiences to researchers, and using instructional design was likely to help us meet this goal. Learning outcomes were identified, followed by developing active, collaborative learning strategies and activities. After implementation, the workshops were evaluated informally, resulting in planned changes and improvements to future offerings.
Conclusions: Using andragogy and instructional design was a successful method of developing the workshops as it provided a structure to follow, and centered researcher needs. While positive feedback was received from workshop participants, there is a need to formally evaluate the learning outcomes to determine if the workshops resulted in improvements in systematic searching practices. The approach to developing the workshops can be adapted by other libraries delivering similar training on systematic searching. It is our aim that by promoting the use of effective teaching methods, the quality of search methods in knowledge syntheses will improve.
{"title":"Using andragogy and instructional design to teach workshops on systematic searching in an academic library: case report.","authors":"Erin Roga","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2185","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge syntheses require complex searches of the literature, but many have poor quality, irreproducible search methods. Academic libraries support researchers conducting knowledge syntheses in many ways, including providing training such as workshops. However, for training to be successful, effective teaching theories and methods need to be used, such as andragogy and instructional design. These can help to develop learning strategies and experiences based on the needs of the learners.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>At Federation University Australia Library, in response to increasing requests for support from researchers conducting knowledge syntheses, a series of workshops on systematic searching was developed using adult learning methods. We aimed to deliver quality, engaging learning experiences to researchers, and using instructional design was likely to help us meet this goal. Learning outcomes were identified, followed by developing active, collaborative learning strategies and activities. After implementation, the workshops were evaluated informally, resulting in planned changes and improvements to future offerings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using andragogy and instructional design was a successful method of developing the workshops as it provided a structure to follow, and centered researcher needs. While positive feedback was received from workshop participants, there is a need to formally evaluate the learning outcomes to determine if the workshops resulted in improvements in systematic searching practices. The approach to developing the workshops can be adapted by other libraries delivering similar training on systematic searching. It is our aim that by promoting the use of effective teaching methods, the quality of search methods in knowledge syntheses will improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947932/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2203
Christopher Duffy, Tovah Tripp, Ezra Schneier, Margaret Dreker, Miriam Hoffman, Joshua Josephs
Background: Use of evidence-based medicine (EBM) can improve patient outcomes, but translating classroom learning of EBM to clinical practice is challenging. Training students to utilize and apply principles of EBM is critical but data and methods for evaluating students' EBM skills are lacking.
Case presentation: The Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine has early curricular introduction of information mastery techniques to combat these challenges. Students create research presentations related to the weekly problem-based-learning (PBL) case to practice applying EBM skills. Medical librarians developed and utilized an assessment tool to evaluate students' weekly presentations. Librarian staff reviewed 595 presentations during the first year of the pre-clerkship curriculum using five criteria: (1) appropriate scope of presentation (2) correct categorization of the question based on the finding information framework (3) appropriate resource used (4) search strategy and (5) bibliographic citations according to American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines.
Conclusions: Of the evaluated presentations using these criteria, the majority of students routinely and reliably applied EBM skills in their case-based presentations. Further studies will need to look at continued development of these skills throughout other phases of training.
{"title":"Information mastery skills among pre-clerkship students in a problem-based learning curriculum: a case report.","authors":"Christopher Duffy, Tovah Tripp, Ezra Schneier, Margaret Dreker, Miriam Hoffman, Joshua Josephs","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2203","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of evidence-based medicine (EBM) can improve patient outcomes, but translating classroom learning of EBM to clinical practice is challenging. Training students to utilize and apply principles of EBM is critical but data and methods for evaluating students' EBM skills are lacking.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine has early curricular introduction of information mastery techniques to combat these challenges. Students create research presentations related to the weekly problem-based-learning (PBL) case to practice applying EBM skills. Medical librarians developed and utilized an assessment tool to evaluate students' weekly presentations. Librarian staff reviewed 595 presentations during the first year of the pre-clerkship curriculum using five criteria: (1) appropriate scope of presentation (2) correct categorization of the question based on the finding information framework (3) appropriate resource used (4) search strategy and (5) bibliographic citations according to American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Of the evaluated presentations using these criteria, the majority of students routinely and reliably applied EBM skills in their case-based presentations. Further studies will need to look at continued development of these skills throughout other phases of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947936/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.1756
Pierre Pluye, Vera Granikov, Virginie Paquet, Francesca Frati, Fabio Balli, Jiamin Dai, Reem El Sherif, Quan Nha Hong, Roland M Grad
Background: Community-dwelling patients with complex care needs (hereafter "patients") seek information to choose optimal care. However, patients with low ehealth literacy often have difficulty finding trustworthy, easy-to-understand information. Improving their ehealth literacy can lead to multiple positive health outcomes. This study aimed to describe patients' perceptions of the usability and potential impacts of a web-based, ehealth literacy-oriented intervention.
Case description: To support patients in finding, appraising, and using online health information (the three core principles of ehealth literacy) we developed the Online Health Information Aid (OHIA), which includes a website, an educational video, and a game. An evaluation was conducted with five patients who received the intervention. Pre-intervention (Day 1) and post-intervention (Day 30) data were collected. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared in a joint display. Participants included three women and two men aged 46 to 71 years (mean age: 62) with two to 11 chronic health conditions (mean: 5) and two to 20 medications (mean: 10). Participants found the website usable (e.g., "good tool"). For the video, usability scores were high (67%-96%; mean: 79%) with positive comments (e.g., "good and helpful"). However, the game's usability was lower (40%-78%; mean: 60%), and comments were negative (e.g., "complex and not readable"). For three participants, ehealth literacy levels (n=2) and/or knowledge for appraising online health information (n=2) increased post-intervention. However, they did not perceive any impact of the intervention.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the OHIA intervention, specifically the website and the video, is a promising approach to improving ehealth literacy among people with lower education, and a family income below or around the poverty line, including patients with complex care needs.
{"title":"Usability and potential impact of a web-based literacy-oriented intervention for community-dwelling patients with complex care needs: a mixed methods case report.","authors":"Pierre Pluye, Vera Granikov, Virginie Paquet, Francesca Frati, Fabio Balli, Jiamin Dai, Reem El Sherif, Quan Nha Hong, Roland M Grad","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.1756","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.1756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-dwelling patients with complex care needs (hereafter \"patients\") seek information to choose optimal care. However, patients with low ehealth literacy often have difficulty finding trustworthy, easy-to-understand information. Improving their ehealth literacy can lead to multiple positive health outcomes. This study aimed to describe patients' perceptions of the usability and potential impacts of a web-based, ehealth literacy-oriented intervention.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>To support patients in finding, appraising, and using online health information (the three core principles of ehealth literacy) we developed the Online Health Information Aid (OHIA), which includes a website, an educational video, and a game. An evaluation was conducted with five patients who received the intervention. Pre-intervention (Day 1) and post-intervention (Day 30) data were collected. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared in a joint display. Participants included three women and two men aged 46 to 71 years (mean age: 62) with two to 11 chronic health conditions (mean: 5) and two to 20 medications (mean: 10). Participants found the website usable (e.g., \"good tool\"). For the video, usability scores were high (67%-96%; mean: 79%) with positive comments (e.g., \"good and helpful\"). However, the game's usability was lower (40%-78%; mean: 60%), and comments were negative (e.g., \"complex and not readable\"). For three participants, ehealth literacy levels (n=2) and/or knowledge for appraising online health information (n=2) increased post-intervention. However, they did not perceive any impact of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the OHIA intervention, specifically the website and the video, is a promising approach to improving ehealth literacy among people with lower education, and a family income below or around the poverty line, including patients with complex care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947933/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-17DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2431
Jean P Shipman
The medical or health sciences library professional vocabulary uses many words that start with an I. On the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Janet Doe Lectureship, this lecture highlights and summarizes the 15 lectures (27%) that have included an I in their titles. The most frequent I word was information; this word appeared in four lectures. Only one lecture used more than one I word in the title. A new I word incorporated in this lecture but not its title is Intelligence, Artificial. +Italics were used to emphasize I words within the lecture or titles of published works.
{"title":"The I's have it: everything needed to practice medical librarianship starts with an I.","authors":"Jean P Shipman","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2431","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medical or health sciences library professional vocabulary uses many words that start with an <i>I</i>. On the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Janet Doe Lectureship, this lecture highlights and summarizes the 15 lectures (27%) that have included an <i>I</i> in their titles. The most frequent <i>I</i> word was information; this word appeared in four lectures. Only one lecture used more than one <i>I</i> word in the title. A new <i>I</i> word incorporated in this lecture but not its title is Intelligence, Artificial. +Italics were used to emphasize I words within the lecture or titles of published works.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
OpenEvidence. AI based Medical Information platform. Released 2023. OpenEvidence Inc. Cambridge. Massachusetts. https://www.openevidence.com/; Founder& CEO: DR. Daniel Nadler. Free of cost for Healthcare Professionals. Registration is required to use Open Evidence.
{"title":"OpenEvidence.","authors":"Suja Philip, Reghu Kurian","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2247","DOIUrl":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OpenEvidence</b>. AI based Medical Information platform. Released 2023. OpenEvidence Inc. Cambridge. Massachusetts. https://www.openevidence.com/; Founder& CEO: DR. Daniel Nadler. Free of cost for Healthcare Professionals. Registration is required to use Open Evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 1","pages":"86-87"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951846/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147349052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}