一项新的图形修饰的营养评分对食物营养成分和超加工的客观理解的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599
Bernard Srour, Serge Hercberg, Pilar Galan, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Laurent Bourhis, Morgane Fialon, Barthélémy Sarda, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Chantal Julia, Mathilde Touvier
{"title":"一项新的图形修饰的营养评分对食物营养成分和超加工的客观理解的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Bernard Srour,&nbsp;Serge Hercberg,&nbsp;Pilar Galan,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Monteiro,&nbsp;Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi,&nbsp;Laurent Bourhis,&nbsp;Morgane Fialon,&nbsp;Barthélémy Sarda,&nbsp;Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo,&nbsp;Younes Esseddik,&nbsp;Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy,&nbsp;Chantal Julia,&nbsp;Mathilde Touvier","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When considering health-related impacts of foods, nutrient profile and (ultra)processing are two complementary dimensions. The Nutri-Score informs on the nutrient profile dimension. Recently, mounting evidence linked ultraprocessed food consumption to various adverse health outcomes, independently of their nutrient profile. To inform consumers about each of these health-related dimensions of food, we tested, in a randomised controlled trial, if a graphically modified version 'Nutri-Score V.2.0', including a black 'ultraprocessed' banner, would improve the capacity of consumers to rank products according to their nutrient profile and to detect those ultra-processed, compared with a no-label situation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>21 159 participants included in the NutriNet-Santé web-cohort were randomly assigned to a control arm (no front-of-pack label) or an experimental arm (Nutri-Score 2.0) and were presented an online questionnaire with three sets of food products (cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals) to rank according to nutrient profile and to identify ultraprocessed foods. The primary outcome was objective understanding of nutrient profile and ultraprocessing, represented by a score of correct answers. Secondary outcomes were purchasing intentions and the healthiest-perceived product. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Nutri-Score V.2.0 increased the objective understanding of both the nutrient profile dimension (OR <sub>highest vs lowest score category</sub>=29.0 (23.4-35.9), p<0.001) and the ultraprocessing dimension (OR=174.3 (151.4-200.5), p<0.001). Trends were similar for cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals. The Nutri-Score V.2.0 had a positive effect on purchasing intentions and on the products perceived as the healthiest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This randomised controlled trial demonstrates the interest of a front-of-pack label combining the Nutri-Score (informing on the nutrient profile dimension) with an additional graphic mention, indicating when the food is ultraprocessed, compared with a no-label situation. Our results show that a combined label enabled participants to independently understand these two complementary dimensions of foods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05610930.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/6e/bmjnph-2022-000599.PMC10359533.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a new graphically modified Nutri-Score on the objective understanding of foods' nutrient profile and ultraprocessing: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bernard Srour,&nbsp;Serge Hercberg,&nbsp;Pilar Galan,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Monteiro,&nbsp;Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi,&nbsp;Laurent Bourhis,&nbsp;Morgane Fialon,&nbsp;Barthélémy Sarda,&nbsp;Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo,&nbsp;Younes Esseddik,&nbsp;Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy,&nbsp;Chantal Julia,&nbsp;Mathilde Touvier\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When considering health-related impacts of foods, nutrient profile and (ultra)processing are two complementary dimensions. The Nutri-Score informs on the nutrient profile dimension. Recently, mounting evidence linked ultraprocessed food consumption to various adverse health outcomes, independently of their nutrient profile. To inform consumers about each of these health-related dimensions of food, we tested, in a randomised controlled trial, if a graphically modified version 'Nutri-Score V.2.0', including a black 'ultraprocessed' banner, would improve the capacity of consumers to rank products according to their nutrient profile and to detect those ultra-processed, compared with a no-label situation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>21 159 participants included in the NutriNet-Santé web-cohort were randomly assigned to a control arm (no front-of-pack label) or an experimental arm (Nutri-Score 2.0) and were presented an online questionnaire with three sets of food products (cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals) to rank according to nutrient profile and to identify ultraprocessed foods. The primary outcome was objective understanding of nutrient profile and ultraprocessing, represented by a score of correct answers. Secondary outcomes were purchasing intentions and the healthiest-perceived product. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Nutri-Score V.2.0 increased the objective understanding of both the nutrient profile dimension (OR <sub>highest vs lowest score category</sub>=29.0 (23.4-35.9), p<0.001) and the ultraprocessing dimension (OR=174.3 (151.4-200.5), p<0.001). Trends were similar for cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals. The Nutri-Score V.2.0 had a positive effect on purchasing intentions and on the products perceived as the healthiest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This randomised controlled trial demonstrates the interest of a front-of-pack label combining the Nutri-Score (informing on the nutrient profile dimension) with an additional graphic mention, indicating when the food is ultraprocessed, compared with a no-label situation. Our results show that a combined label enabled participants to independently understand these two complementary dimensions of foods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05610930.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/6e/bmjnph-2022-000599.PMC10359533.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:在考虑食品对健康的影响时,营养状况和(超)加工是两个互补的维度。营养评分显示营养状况维度。最近,越来越多的证据表明,超加工食品的消费与各种不良健康后果有关,与它们的营养状况无关。为了让消费者了解食品中与健康相关的每一个方面,我们在一项随机对照试验中测试了一个经过图形修改的版本“Nutri Score V.2.0”,包括一个黑色的“超加工”横幅,与无标签的情况相比,是否会提高消费者根据营养状况对产品进行排名和检测超加工产品的能力。方法:21 NutriNet Santéweb队列中的159名参与者被随机分配到对照组(无包装前标签)或实验组(Nutri Score 2.0),并接受了一份包含三组食品(饼干、早餐麦片和即食食品)的在线问卷,根据营养状况进行排名,以识别超加工食品。主要结果是对营养状况和超加工的客观理解,用正确答案的分数表示。次要结果是购买意愿和最健康的感知产品。进行多项逻辑回归。结果:Nutri Score V.2.0增加了对营养状况维度的客观理解(OR最高与最低评分类别=29.0(23.4-35.9),P结论:这项随机对照试验证明了包装前标签将Nutri评分(告知营养状况维度)与额外的图形提述相结合的兴趣,与无标签的情况相比,指示食品何时经过超加工。我们的研究结果表明,组合标签使参与者能够独立理解食物的这两个互补维度。试验注册号:NCT05610930。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of a new graphically modified Nutri-Score on the objective understanding of foods' nutrient profile and ultraprocessing: a randomised controlled trial.

Introduction: When considering health-related impacts of foods, nutrient profile and (ultra)processing are two complementary dimensions. The Nutri-Score informs on the nutrient profile dimension. Recently, mounting evidence linked ultraprocessed food consumption to various adverse health outcomes, independently of their nutrient profile. To inform consumers about each of these health-related dimensions of food, we tested, in a randomised controlled trial, if a graphically modified version 'Nutri-Score V.2.0', including a black 'ultraprocessed' banner, would improve the capacity of consumers to rank products according to their nutrient profile and to detect those ultra-processed, compared with a no-label situation.

Methods: 21 159 participants included in the NutriNet-Santé web-cohort were randomly assigned to a control arm (no front-of-pack label) or an experimental arm (Nutri-Score 2.0) and were presented an online questionnaire with three sets of food products (cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals) to rank according to nutrient profile and to identify ultraprocessed foods. The primary outcome was objective understanding of nutrient profile and ultraprocessing, represented by a score of correct answers. Secondary outcomes were purchasing intentions and the healthiest-perceived product. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed.

Results: The Nutri-Score V.2.0 increased the objective understanding of both the nutrient profile dimension (OR highest vs lowest score category=29.0 (23.4-35.9), p<0.001) and the ultraprocessing dimension (OR=174.3 (151.4-200.5), p<0.001). Trends were similar for cookies, breakfast cereals and ready-to-eat meals. The Nutri-Score V.2.0 had a positive effect on purchasing intentions and on the products perceived as the healthiest.

Conclusion: This randomised controlled trial demonstrates the interest of a front-of-pack label combining the Nutri-Score (informing on the nutrient profile dimension) with an additional graphic mention, indicating when the food is ultraprocessed, compared with a no-label situation. Our results show that a combined label enabled participants to independently understand these two complementary dimensions of foods.

Trial registration number: NCT05610930.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Landscape analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing metrics for consumer nutrition and health in the food and beverage sector. Maternal prenatal, with or without postpartum, vitamin D3 supplementation does not improve maternal iron status at delivery or infant iron status at 6 months of age: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial Effects of behavioural change communication (BCC) on menstrual hygiene practices among urban school adolescent girls: a pilot study Physiotherapy-led telehealth and exercise intervention to improve mobility in older people receiving aged care services (TOP UP): protocol for a randomised controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial Effects of a 5-week intake of erythritol and xylitol on vascular function, abdominal fat and glucose tolerance in humans with obesity: a pilot trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1