Haonan Dong, Zexi He, Haifeng Wang, Mingxia Ding, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Hongjin Shi, Lan Mao, Chongzhi Hu, Jiansong Wang
{"title":"通过综合生物信息学分析确定肾透明细胞癌进展和预后的潜在生物标志物。","authors":"Haonan Dong, Zexi He, Haifeng Wang, Mingxia Ding, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Hongjin Shi, Lan Mao, Chongzhi Hu, Jiansong Wang","doi":"10.3233/THC-230282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and effective biomarkers will improve diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC through public databases and clinical samples and assessed its correlation with clinicopathological features and patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and clinical specimens were gathered, NPEPL1 expression levels were analyzed; a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of NPEPL1; and clinicopathological data was used to study the correlations between expression and clinical parameters. NPEPL1's prognostic value was appraised using a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve, Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model; Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of differently expressed genes between tissues with high and low NPEPL1 expression were used to estimate the underlying mechanisms involved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPEPL1 was significantly higher-expressed in ccRCC tissue. ROC analysis showed that NPEPL1 had noteworthy diagnostic efficacy. NPEPL1 expression was closely related to clinicopathological parameters, such as T and M stage. K-M analysis showed that overall survival was significantly shortened with high NPEPL1 expression. Cox regression analysis showed that NPEPL1 expression was an independent risk factor predicting overall survival. The nomogram showed a significantly high clinical value in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities in ccRCC. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis suggested that NPEPL1 may promote the occurrence and development of ccRCC via the Ras signaling and other pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC was higher than that in normal kidney tissues and was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. Therefore, NPEPL1 is a promising prognostic biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"897-914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of potential biomarkers for progression and prognosis of renal clear cell carcinoma by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haonan Dong, Zexi He, Haifeng Wang, Mingxia Ding, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Hongjin Shi, Lan Mao, Chongzhi Hu, Jiansong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/THC-230282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and effective biomarkers will improve diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC through public databases and clinical samples and assessed its correlation with clinicopathological features and patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and clinical specimens were gathered, NPEPL1 expression levels were analyzed; a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of NPEPL1; and clinicopathological data was used to study the correlations between expression and clinical parameters. NPEPL1's prognostic value was appraised using a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve, Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model; Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of differently expressed genes between tissues with high and low NPEPL1 expression were used to estimate the underlying mechanisms involved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPEPL1 was significantly higher-expressed in ccRCC tissue. ROC analysis showed that NPEPL1 had noteworthy diagnostic efficacy. NPEPL1 expression was closely related to clinicopathological parameters, such as T and M stage. K-M analysis showed that overall survival was significantly shortened with high NPEPL1 expression. Cox regression analysis showed that NPEPL1 expression was an independent risk factor predicting overall survival. The nomogram showed a significantly high clinical value in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities in ccRCC. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis suggested that NPEPL1 may promote the occurrence and development of ccRCC via the Ras signaling and other pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC was higher than that in normal kidney tissues and was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. Therefore, NPEPL1 is a promising prognostic biomarker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"897-914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification of potential biomarkers for progression and prognosis of renal clear cell carcinoma by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.
Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and effective biomarkers will improve diagnosis and treatment.
Objective: This study investigated NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC through public databases and clinical samples and assessed its correlation with clinicopathological features and patient prognosis.
Method: Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and clinical specimens were gathered, NPEPL1 expression levels were analyzed; a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of NPEPL1; and clinicopathological data was used to study the correlations between expression and clinical parameters. NPEPL1's prognostic value was appraised using a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve, Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram model; Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of differently expressed genes between tissues with high and low NPEPL1 expression were used to estimate the underlying mechanisms involved.
Results: NPEPL1 was significantly higher-expressed in ccRCC tissue. ROC analysis showed that NPEPL1 had noteworthy diagnostic efficacy. NPEPL1 expression was closely related to clinicopathological parameters, such as T and M stage. K-M analysis showed that overall survival was significantly shortened with high NPEPL1 expression. Cox regression analysis showed that NPEPL1 expression was an independent risk factor predicting overall survival. The nomogram showed a significantly high clinical value in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities in ccRCC. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis suggested that NPEPL1 may promote the occurrence and development of ccRCC via the Ras signaling and other pathways.
Conclusion: NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC was higher than that in normal kidney tissues and was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. Therefore, NPEPL1 is a promising prognostic biomarker.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).