衔接儿童疼痛护理:远程医疗利用。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001132
Amber M Sepsey, Olivia E Sokol, Samantha E Huestis, Rashmi P Bhandari
{"title":"衔接儿童疼痛护理:远程医疗利用。","authors":"Amber M Sepsey, Olivia E Sokol, Samantha E Huestis, Rashmi P Bhandari","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate subsequent shifts to patient access to tertiary pain management care following shelter-in-place (SIP) and increased telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Retrospective naturalistic design was used. Data for this study were extracted from a retrospective review of the Pediatric-Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry, with additional demographic information collected using chart review. Participants were 906 youth who received an initial evaluation either in-person (n=472) within the 18 months before SIP or through telehealth (n=434) within the 18 months after SIP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient variables to assess access included geographic distance from the clinic, ethnic and racial diversity, and patient’s insurance type. Descriptive characteristics for each group were analyzed using χ2 test, percentage change, and t-test analyses. Results: Data indicated that transitioning to telehealth resulted in maintained access rates between groups as measured by race and ethnic diversity as well as distance traveled from the clinic. A trend toward increase in government-funded insurance was found, though no statistically significant differences were identified between telehealth and in-person visits. Though the majority of participants (in-person: 52.75%; telehealth 55.81%) lived within 50 miles of the clinic, results indicated that telehealth allowed for a statistically significant increase in evaluation access for families living further from the clinic within a 50-mile radius. Discussion: Overall, accessibility to pediatric pain management through telehealth during SIP was maintained despite significant declines in overall access to health care, with some trends in increased accessibility for patients with government insurance.","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"39 8","pages":"408-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Access to Pediatric Pain Care: Telehealth Utilization.\",\"authors\":\"Amber M Sepsey, Olivia E Sokol, Samantha E Huestis, Rashmi P Bhandari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate subsequent shifts to patient access to tertiary pain management care following shelter-in-place (SIP) and increased telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Retrospective naturalistic design was used. Data for this study were extracted from a retrospective review of the Pediatric-Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry, with additional demographic information collected using chart review. Participants were 906 youth who received an initial evaluation either in-person (n=472) within the 18 months before SIP or through telehealth (n=434) within the 18 months after SIP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient variables to assess access included geographic distance from the clinic, ethnic and racial diversity, and patient’s insurance type. Descriptive characteristics for each group were analyzed using χ2 test, percentage change, and t-test analyses. Results: Data indicated that transitioning to telehealth resulted in maintained access rates between groups as measured by race and ethnic diversity as well as distance traveled from the clinic. A trend toward increase in government-funded insurance was found, though no statistically significant differences were identified between telehealth and in-person visits. Though the majority of participants (in-person: 52.75%; telehealth 55.81%) lived within 50 miles of the clinic, results indicated that telehealth allowed for a statistically significant increase in evaluation access for families living further from the clinic within a 50-mile radius. Discussion: Overall, accessibility to pediatric pain management through telehealth during SIP was maintained despite significant declines in overall access to health care, with some trends in increased accessibility for patients with government insurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"408-413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,就地避难(SIP)和增加远程医疗后,患者获得三级疼痛管理护理的后续转变。材料与方法:采用回顾性自然主义设计。本研究的数据来自儿科合作健康结果信息登记处的回顾性审查,并使用图表审查收集了额外的人口统计信息。参与者为906名青年,他们在SIP前18个月内接受了亲自(n=472)的初步评估,或在SIP后18个月内通过远程医疗(n=434)接受了初步评估。评估可及性的患者变量包括与诊所的地理距离、民族和种族多样性以及患者的保险类型。采用χ 2检验、百分比变化和t检验分析各组的描述性特征。结果:数据表明,通过种族和民族多样性以及距离诊所的距离来衡量,向远程医疗的过渡导致群体之间的接诊率保持不变。政府资助的保险有增加的趋势,尽管在远程医疗和亲自就诊之间没有统计学上的显著差异。尽管大多数参与者(面对面:52.75%;远程医疗(55.81%)居住在诊所50英里范围内,结果表明,远程医疗使居住在50英里半径范围内远离诊所的家庭获得评估的机会在统计上显著增加。讨论:总体而言,尽管总体上获得医疗保健的机会显著下降,但在SIP期间通过远程医疗获得儿科疼痛管理的机会仍然保持不变,有一些趋势是,获得政府保险的患者的可及性有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging Access to Pediatric Pain Care: Telehealth Utilization.
Objectives: To evaluate subsequent shifts to patient access to tertiary pain management care following shelter-in-place (SIP) and increased telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Retrospective naturalistic design was used. Data for this study were extracted from a retrospective review of the Pediatric-Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry, with additional demographic information collected using chart review. Participants were 906 youth who received an initial evaluation either in-person (n=472) within the 18 months before SIP or through telehealth (n=434) within the 18 months after SIP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient variables to assess access included geographic distance from the clinic, ethnic and racial diversity, and patient’s insurance type. Descriptive characteristics for each group were analyzed using χ2 test, percentage change, and t-test analyses. Results: Data indicated that transitioning to telehealth resulted in maintained access rates between groups as measured by race and ethnic diversity as well as distance traveled from the clinic. A trend toward increase in government-funded insurance was found, though no statistically significant differences were identified between telehealth and in-person visits. Though the majority of participants (in-person: 52.75%; telehealth 55.81%) lived within 50 miles of the clinic, results indicated that telehealth allowed for a statistically significant increase in evaluation access for families living further from the clinic within a 50-mile radius. Discussion: Overall, accessibility to pediatric pain management through telehealth during SIP was maintained despite significant declines in overall access to health care, with some trends in increased accessibility for patients with government insurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Block on Rebound Pain After Shoulder Arthroscopy. Occurrence of Opioid-Related Neurocognitive Symptoms Associated With Long-term Opioid Therapy. Study on the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy for Shoulder Pain Caused by Trigger Points. Assessment of Relationship Between Dietary Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Behavioral Factors, Physical Measurement, and Risk of Migraine: A Univariable and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study. Comparing Analgesic Efficacies of Combined Fascial Plane Blocks for Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1