我们还在这里:忽视和察觉到的歧视激发了美国原住民的公民参与。

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/09567976231165271
J Doris Dai, Jamie L Yellowtail, Ariana Munoz-Salgado, Julisa J Lopez, Emma Ward-Griffin, Crystal Echo Hawk, Judith LeBlanc, Nikki Santos, Adam Farero, Arianne E Eason, Stephanie A Fryberg
{"title":"我们还在这里:忽视和察觉到的歧视激发了美国原住民的公民参与。","authors":"J Doris Dai,&nbsp;Jamie L Yellowtail,&nbsp;Ariana Munoz-Salgado,&nbsp;Julisa J Lopez,&nbsp;Emma Ward-Griffin,&nbsp;Crystal Echo Hawk,&nbsp;Judith LeBlanc,&nbsp;Nikki Santos,&nbsp;Adam Farero,&nbsp;Arianne E Eason,&nbsp;Stephanie A Fryberg","doi":"10.1177/09567976231165271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Native American organizations and tribes launched get-out-the-vote campaigns that motivated Native peoples to vote in record numbers and helped flip battleground states. We conducted four studies (total <i>N</i> = 11,661 Native American adults) to examine the social and cultural factors explaining this historic Native civic engagement (e.g., campaigning). Results revealed that the more participants identified as being Native, the more they reported (a) engaging in civic activities, including get-out-the-vote behaviors during the 2020 election (Study 1); (b) civic engagement more broadly across a 5-year period (pilot study, Study 2); and (c) intentions to engage in civic activities in the future (Study 3). Moreover, participants who more strongly identified as Native were more likely to recognize the omission of their group from society and perceive greater group discrimination, which both independently and serially predicted greater civic engagement. These results suggest that leveraging the link between Native identification and group injustices can motivate action.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 7","pages":"739-753"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We Are Still Here: Omission and Perceived Discrimination Galvanized Civic Engagement Among Native Americans.\",\"authors\":\"J Doris Dai,&nbsp;Jamie L Yellowtail,&nbsp;Ariana Munoz-Salgado,&nbsp;Julisa J Lopez,&nbsp;Emma Ward-Griffin,&nbsp;Crystal Echo Hawk,&nbsp;Judith LeBlanc,&nbsp;Nikki Santos,&nbsp;Adam Farero,&nbsp;Arianne E Eason,&nbsp;Stephanie A Fryberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09567976231165271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Native American organizations and tribes launched get-out-the-vote campaigns that motivated Native peoples to vote in record numbers and helped flip battleground states. We conducted four studies (total <i>N</i> = 11,661 Native American adults) to examine the social and cultural factors explaining this historic Native civic engagement (e.g., campaigning). Results revealed that the more participants identified as being Native, the more they reported (a) engaging in civic activities, including get-out-the-vote behaviors during the 2020 election (Study 1); (b) civic engagement more broadly across a 5-year period (pilot study, Study 2); and (c) intentions to engage in civic activities in the future (Study 3). Moreover, participants who more strongly identified as Native were more likely to recognize the omission of their group from society and perceive greater group discrimination, which both independently and serially predicted greater civic engagement. These results suggest that leveraging the link between Native identification and group injustices can motivate action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"34 7\",\"pages\":\"739-753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231165271\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231165271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2020年美国总统大选之前,美国原住民组织和部落发起了一场动员投票的运动,激励原住民以创纪录的数量投票,并帮助扭转了战场州的局面。我们进行了四项研究(总共N = 11,661名美洲原住民成年人),以检查解释这种历史性的土著公民参与(例如,竞选活动)的社会和文化因素。结果显示,被认为是本地人的参与者越多,他们报告的(a)参与公民活动的次数就越多,包括在2020年大选期间的投票行为(研究1);(b)在五年期间更广泛的公民参与(试点研究,研究2);(c)未来参与公民活动的意愿(研究3)。此外,更强烈地认同原住民身份的参与者更有可能认识到他们的群体被社会忽视,并感受到更大的群体歧视,这既独立又连续地预示着更大的公民参与。这些结果表明,利用土著认同和群体不公正之间的联系可以激励行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
We Are Still Here: Omission and Perceived Discrimination Galvanized Civic Engagement Among Native Americans.

Leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Native American organizations and tribes launched get-out-the-vote campaigns that motivated Native peoples to vote in record numbers and helped flip battleground states. We conducted four studies (total N = 11,661 Native American adults) to examine the social and cultural factors explaining this historic Native civic engagement (e.g., campaigning). Results revealed that the more participants identified as being Native, the more they reported (a) engaging in civic activities, including get-out-the-vote behaviors during the 2020 election (Study 1); (b) civic engagement more broadly across a 5-year period (pilot study, Study 2); and (c) intentions to engage in civic activities in the future (Study 3). Moreover, participants who more strongly identified as Native were more likely to recognize the omission of their group from society and perceive greater group discrimination, which both independently and serially predicted greater civic engagement. These results suggest that leveraging the link between Native identification and group injustices can motivate action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
期刊最新文献
People Place Larger Bets When Risky Choices Provide a Postbet Option to Cash Out. On the Unequal Burden of Obesity: Obesity's Adverse Consequences Are Contingent on Regional Obesity Prevalence. Corrigendum to "A Practical Significance Bias in Laypeople's Evaluation of Scientific Findings". Racial Minorities Face Discrimination From Across the Political Spectrum When Seeking to Form Ties on Social Media: Evidence From a Field Experiment. Gender Differences in Climbing up the Ladder: Why Experience Closes the Ambition Gender Gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1