局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤消退分级:影响因素及预后意义。

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY International journal of clinical and experimental pathology Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Xingang Lu, Ruihua Qi, Ying Xu, Xiao Wang, Yibo Cai, Chunliang Wang
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤消退分级:影响因素及预后意义。","authors":"Xingang Lu,&nbsp;Ruihua Qi,&nbsp;Ying Xu,&nbsp;Xiao Wang,&nbsp;Yibo Cai,&nbsp;Chunliang Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The extent of tumor regression varies widely among patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. We evaluated the tumor regression grade (TRG) classification of patients and analyzed factors related to TRG and its value in predicting prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic data of 269 consecutive patients with LARC treated from February 2002 to October 2014. The grade of TRG was based on the extent of primary tumor replaced by fibrosis. Clinical characteristics and relative survival were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 269 patients, among whom 67 patients (24.9%) achieved TRG0, whereas 46 patients (17.1%) showed TRG3. TRG1 and TRG2 were both found in 78 patients (29.0%). Clinicopathologic factors that were related to TRG included post-NACRT carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.002), clinical T stage (P=0.022), pathologic T stage (P<0.001) and pathologic lymph node status (P=0.003). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74.6%, 55.1%, 47.4%, 28.3% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 64.2%, 47.4%, 37.2%, 23.9% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). Based on multivariate analysis, TRG was a significant predictor for both OS (P=0.039) and DFS (P=0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicopathologic factors such as post-NACRT CEA level, clinical T stage, pathological T stage and pathological lymph node status are significantly associated with TRG. TRG is an independent predictor of survival. Therefore, it is reasonable to include the TRG for clinicopathologic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13943,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental pathology","volume":"16 6","pages":"124-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326522/pdf/ijcep0016-0124.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: influencing factors and prognostic significance.\",\"authors\":\"Xingang Lu,&nbsp;Ruihua Qi,&nbsp;Ying Xu,&nbsp;Xiao Wang,&nbsp;Yibo Cai,&nbsp;Chunliang Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The extent of tumor regression varies widely among patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. We evaluated the tumor regression grade (TRG) classification of patients and analyzed factors related to TRG and its value in predicting prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic data of 269 consecutive patients with LARC treated from February 2002 to October 2014. The grade of TRG was based on the extent of primary tumor replaced by fibrosis. Clinical characteristics and relative survival were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 269 patients, among whom 67 patients (24.9%) achieved TRG0, whereas 46 patients (17.1%) showed TRG3. TRG1 and TRG2 were both found in 78 patients (29.0%). Clinicopathologic factors that were related to TRG included post-NACRT carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.002), clinical T stage (P=0.022), pathologic T stage (P<0.001) and pathologic lymph node status (P=0.003). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74.6%, 55.1%, 47.4%, 28.3% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 64.2%, 47.4%, 37.2%, 23.9% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). Based on multivariate analysis, TRG was a significant predictor for both OS (P=0.039) and DFS (P=0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicopathologic factors such as post-NACRT CEA level, clinical T stage, pathological T stage and pathological lymph node status are significantly associated with TRG. TRG is an independent predictor of survival. Therefore, it is reasonable to include the TRG for clinicopathologic assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental pathology\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"124-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326522/pdf/ijcep0016-0124.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在接受新辅助放化疗(NACRT)后全肠系膜切除(TME)手术的患者中,肿瘤消退的程度差异很大。我们评估了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者的肿瘤消退等级(TRG)分类,分析了TRG相关因素及其预测预后的价值。方法:回顾性分析2002年2月至2014年10月连续治疗的269例LARC患者的临床病理资料。TRG的分级以原发肿瘤的程度代替纤维化程度。回顾性分析临床特点及相对生存率。结果:269例患者中,达到TRG0者67例(24.9%),达到TRG3者46例(17.1%)。78例(29.0%)患者均出现TRG1和TRG2。与TRG相关的临床病理因素有:nacrt后癌胚抗原(CEA)水平(P=0.002)、临床T分期(P=0.022)、病理T分期(P=0.022)。结论:nacrt后CEA水平、临床T分期、病理T分期、病理淋巴结状态等临床病理因素与TRG有显著相关性。TRG是一个独立的生存预测指标。因此,将TRG纳入临床病理评估是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tumor regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: influencing factors and prognostic significance.

Objective: The extent of tumor regression varies widely among patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. We evaluated the tumor regression grade (TRG) classification of patients and analyzed factors related to TRG and its value in predicting prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic data of 269 consecutive patients with LARC treated from February 2002 to October 2014. The grade of TRG was based on the extent of primary tumor replaced by fibrosis. Clinical characteristics and relative survival were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: There were 269 patients, among whom 67 patients (24.9%) achieved TRG0, whereas 46 patients (17.1%) showed TRG3. TRG1 and TRG2 were both found in 78 patients (29.0%). Clinicopathologic factors that were related to TRG included post-NACRT carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.002), clinical T stage (P=0.022), pathologic T stage (P<0.001) and pathologic lymph node status (P=0.003). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74.6%, 55.1%, 47.4%, 28.3% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 64.2%, 47.4%, 37.2%, 23.9% for TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, TRG3, respectively (P<0.001). Based on multivariate analysis, TRG was a significant predictor for both OS (P=0.039) and DFS (P=0.043).

Conclusion: Clinicopathologic factors such as post-NACRT CEA level, clinical T stage, pathological T stage and pathological lymph node status are significantly associated with TRG. TRG is an independent predictor of survival. Therefore, it is reasonable to include the TRG for clinicopathologic assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology (IJCEP, ISSN 1936-2625) is a peer reviewed, open access online journal. It was founded in 2008 by an international group of academic pathologists and scientists who are devoted to the scientific exploration of human disease and the rapid dissemination of original data. Unlike most other open access online journals, IJCEP will keep all the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume and issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to keep our warm feelings towards an academic journal. Unlike most other open access online journals, IJCEP will keep all the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume and issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to keep our warm feelings towards an academic journal.
期刊最新文献
Association of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms with aspirin or clopidogrel resistance in ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. Complete response to anti-PD1 therapy and chemotherapy in a patient with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Effects of serum HIF-1α, VEGF, and uPA levels on clinicopathologic findings and prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Erratum: Curcumin induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells and inhibits tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Erratum: LncRNA CCND2-AS1 is up-regulated and regulates proliferation, migration, and invasion in breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1