行为健康管理护理组织工作人员识别和应对自杀风险的培训评估。

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Professional Case Management Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000610
Marcie L Walker, Lori A Weems, Shari L Hutchison, Amy D Herschell, Irina O Karpov, Kim L MacDonald-Wilson
{"title":"行为健康管理护理组织工作人员识别和应对自杀风险的培训评估。","authors":"Marcie L Walker,&nbsp;Lori A Weems,&nbsp;Shari L Hutchison,&nbsp;Amy D Herschell,&nbsp;Irina O Karpov,&nbsp;Kim L MacDonald-Wilson","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Gatekeeper training for individuals who may be in contact with someone contemplating suicide is a recommended suicide prevention strategy. This study assessed organizational-level gatekeeper training.</p><p><strong>Primary care settings: </strong>Gatekeeper training was conducted in a behavioral health managed care organization (BHMCO), which facilitates integrated behavioral and physical health services for 1.4 million Medicaid-enrolled Pennsylvanians.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>Gatekeeper training was offered to BHMCO staff via a new training policy. Gatekeeper trainers were qualified BHMCO staff. Approximately half (47%) of trained staff served as care managers. Pre- and posttraining surveys were administered to assess self-reported confidence in ability to identify and assist individuals at risk for suicide. Post-training, staff responded to a hypothetical vignette involving suicide risk, which was evaluated for skills by gatekeeper trainers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two percent of staff completed training. Mean confidence scores improved significantly from pre- (η = 615) to posttraining (η = 556) (understanding = 3.41 vs. 4.11, respectively; knowledge = 3.47 vs. 4.04; identification = 3.30 vs. 3.94; respond = 3.30 vs. 4.04, p < .0001 for each). Intermediate and advanced skills to address suicide risk were demonstrated post-training in 68.6% and 17.2% of staff, respectively. More care managers versus other BHMCO staff demonstrated advanced skills (21.6% vs. 13.0%); however, both groups showed significant improvement pre- to post-training.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management: </strong>Care managers benefit from suicide prevention training and are uniquely positioned to serve as organizational leaders to successful population health initiatives to decrease suicide through training and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":"28 4","pages":"172-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Training in Identifying and Responding to Suicide Risk by Staff of a Behavioral Health Managed Care Organization.\",\"authors\":\"Marcie L Walker,&nbsp;Lori A Weems,&nbsp;Shari L Hutchison,&nbsp;Amy D Herschell,&nbsp;Irina O Karpov,&nbsp;Kim L MacDonald-Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Gatekeeper training for individuals who may be in contact with someone contemplating suicide is a recommended suicide prevention strategy. This study assessed organizational-level gatekeeper training.</p><p><strong>Primary care settings: </strong>Gatekeeper training was conducted in a behavioral health managed care organization (BHMCO), which facilitates integrated behavioral and physical health services for 1.4 million Medicaid-enrolled Pennsylvanians.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>Gatekeeper training was offered to BHMCO staff via a new training policy. Gatekeeper trainers were qualified BHMCO staff. Approximately half (47%) of trained staff served as care managers. Pre- and posttraining surveys were administered to assess self-reported confidence in ability to identify and assist individuals at risk for suicide. Post-training, staff responded to a hypothetical vignette involving suicide risk, which was evaluated for skills by gatekeeper trainers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two percent of staff completed training. Mean confidence scores improved significantly from pre- (η = 615) to posttraining (η = 556) (understanding = 3.41 vs. 4.11, respectively; knowledge = 3.47 vs. 4.04; identification = 3.30 vs. 3.94; respond = 3.30 vs. 4.04, p < .0001 for each). Intermediate and advanced skills to address suicide risk were demonstrated post-training in 68.6% and 17.2% of staff, respectively. More care managers versus other BHMCO staff demonstrated advanced skills (21.6% vs. 13.0%); however, both groups showed significant improvement pre- to post-training.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management: </strong>Care managers benefit from suicide prevention training and are uniquely positioned to serve as organizational leaders to successful population health initiatives to decrease suicide through training and education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"172-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:建议对可能与打算自杀的人有过接触的人进行门卫培训,以预防自杀。这项研究评估了组织层面的看门人培训。初级保健环境:门卫培训是在一家行为健康管理护理组织(BHMCO)中进行的,该组织为140万参加医疗补助的宾夕法尼亚州人提供综合行为和身体健康服务。方法和样本:通过新的培训政策向BHMCO工作人员提供门卫培训。门卫培训师是合格的BHMCO工作人员。大约一半(47%)受过培训的工作人员担任护理经理。进行训练前和训练后调查,以评估自我报告的对识别和帮助有自杀风险的个人的能力的信心。培训结束后,工作人员对一个涉及自杀风险的假设小插曲做出了回应,看门人培训师对其技能进行了评估。结果:82%的工作人员完成了培训。从训练前(η=615)到训练后(η=556),平均置信度得分显著提高(理解分别为3.41比4.11;知识为3.47比4.04;识别为3.30比3.94;反应为3.30对4.04,各p<0.0001)。68.6%和17.2%的员工在培训后分别展示了应对自杀风险的中级和高级技能。与其他BHMCO员工相比,更多的护理经理表现出了高级技能(21.6%对13.0%);然而,这两组患者在治疗前和治疗后都表现出了显著的改善。对病例管理的启示:护理管理人员受益于自杀预防培训,并处于独特的地位,可以作为成功的人口健康倡议的组织领导者,通过培训和教育减少自杀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Training in Identifying and Responding to Suicide Risk by Staff of a Behavioral Health Managed Care Organization.

Purpose of study: Gatekeeper training for individuals who may be in contact with someone contemplating suicide is a recommended suicide prevention strategy. This study assessed organizational-level gatekeeper training.

Primary care settings: Gatekeeper training was conducted in a behavioral health managed care organization (BHMCO), which facilitates integrated behavioral and physical health services for 1.4 million Medicaid-enrolled Pennsylvanians.

Methodology and sample: Gatekeeper training was offered to BHMCO staff via a new training policy. Gatekeeper trainers were qualified BHMCO staff. Approximately half (47%) of trained staff served as care managers. Pre- and posttraining surveys were administered to assess self-reported confidence in ability to identify and assist individuals at risk for suicide. Post-training, staff responded to a hypothetical vignette involving suicide risk, which was evaluated for skills by gatekeeper trainers.

Results: Eighty-two percent of staff completed training. Mean confidence scores improved significantly from pre- (η = 615) to posttraining (η = 556) (understanding = 3.41 vs. 4.11, respectively; knowledge = 3.47 vs. 4.04; identification = 3.30 vs. 3.94; respond = 3.30 vs. 4.04, p < .0001 for each). Intermediate and advanced skills to address suicide risk were demonstrated post-training in 68.6% and 17.2% of staff, respectively. More care managers versus other BHMCO staff demonstrated advanced skills (21.6% vs. 13.0%); however, both groups showed significant improvement pre- to post-training.

Implications for case management: Care managers benefit from suicide prevention training and are uniquely positioned to serve as organizational leaders to successful population health initiatives to decrease suicide through training and education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
期刊最新文献
Case Management in Prevention of 30-Day Readmission in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. What Do Medicaid Members Want From Their Health Plan?: Insights From a Qualitative Study to Improve Engagement in Case Management. Gather "Round": An Integrated Care Model for the Emergency Department Multi-Visit Patient. Case Managers: Embracing Lifelong Learning. Editor's Commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1