Giorgio Bosso, Gennaro Sansone, Martina Papillo, Alessandro Giaquinto, Silvia Orefice, Enrico Allegorico, Claudia Serra, Valentina Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Francesca Cannavacciuolo, Ferdinando Dello Vicario, Giovanni Porta, Antonio Pagano, Fabio Giuliano Numis
{"title":"接受CPAP治疗的新冠肺炎患者的肺部超声引导PEEP滴定。","authors":"Giorgio Bosso, Gennaro Sansone, Martina Papillo, Alessandro Giaquinto, Silvia Orefice, Enrico Allegorico, Claudia Serra, Valentina Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Francesca Cannavacciuolo, Ferdinando Dello Vicario, Giovanni Porta, Antonio Pagano, Fabio Giuliano Numis","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An increasing number of COVID-19 patients were treated with continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP). To evaluate the clinical effects of personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to standard fixed PEEP in COVID-19 patients requiring CPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single center, prospective, randomized clinical study. Sixty-three COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pneumonia were randomized in two Groups: Group A received CPAP with fixed PEEP of 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, Group B performed the \"PEEP trial\", that consists in the evaluation of best PEEP defined as the PEEP value that precedes the echographic appearance of \"lung pulse\" determining a PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increase. Primary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality + intubation, secondary outcome was the percentage increase of PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>. As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were enrolled in <b>Group A</b> and 31 in <b>Group B</b>. The two groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome occurred in 36 (57.1 %) patients: 23 (71.8 %) in <b>Group A</b> and 13 (41.9 %) in <b>Group B</b> (p<0.01). Mortality was higher in <b>Group A</b> (53.1 vs. 19.3 %, p<0.01), while intubation rate was comparable between groups. <b>Group B</b> showed a higher PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increase than <b>Group A</b> (34.9 vs. 13.1 %, p<0.01). Five cases of pneumothorax were reported in <b>Group A</b>, none in <b>Group B</b>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP trial is associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP. Identifying the best PEEP is useful to increase oxygenation and reduce the incidence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"677-682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP titration in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Bosso, Gennaro Sansone, Martina Papillo, Alessandro Giaquinto, Silvia Orefice, Enrico Allegorico, Claudia Serra, Valentina Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Francesca Cannavacciuolo, Ferdinando Dello Vicario, Giovanni Porta, Antonio Pagano, Fabio Giuliano Numis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An increasing number of COVID-19 patients were treated with continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP). To evaluate the clinical effects of personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to standard fixed PEEP in COVID-19 patients requiring CPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single center, prospective, randomized clinical study. Sixty-three COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pneumonia were randomized in two Groups: Group A received CPAP with fixed PEEP of 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, Group B performed the \\\"PEEP trial\\\", that consists in the evaluation of best PEEP defined as the PEEP value that precedes the echographic appearance of \\\"lung pulse\\\" determining a PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increase. Primary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality + intubation, secondary outcome was the percentage increase of PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>. As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were enrolled in <b>Group A</b> and 31 in <b>Group B</b>. The two groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome occurred in 36 (57.1 %) patients: 23 (71.8 %) in <b>Group A</b> and 13 (41.9 %) in <b>Group B</b> (p<0.01). Mortality was higher in <b>Group A</b> (53.1 vs. 19.3 %, p<0.01), while intubation rate was comparable between groups. <b>Group B</b> showed a higher PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increase than <b>Group A</b> (34.9 vs. 13.1 %, p<0.01). Five cases of pneumothorax were reported in <b>Group A</b>, none in <b>Group B</b>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP trial is associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP. Identifying the best PEEP is useful to increase oxygenation and reduce the incidence of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"677-682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:越来越多的新冠肺炎患者接受持续气道正压(CPAP)治疗。在需要CPAP的新冠肺炎患者中,评估个性化呼气末正压(PEEP)与标准固定式PEEP的临床效果。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机的临床研究。将63名患有低氧性呼吸衰竭和双侧肺炎的新冠肺炎患者随机分为两组:A组接受CPAP,固定PEEP为10 cm H2O,B组进行了“PEEP试验”,该试验包括评估最佳PEEP,定义为在确定PaO2/FiO2增加的“肺脉冲”回声出现之前的PEEP值。主要结果是复合住院死亡率+插管,次要结果是PaO2/FiO2的百分比增加。作为安全性指标,收集了发生率。结果:A组32例,B组31例。两组患者的临床特征和实验室参数具有可比性。主要转归发生在36例(57.1 %) 患者:23(71.8 %) A组和13组(41.9 %) B组(p A组(53.1对19.3 %, p B组显示出高于a组的PaO2/FiO2增加(34.9对13.1 %, p A组,B组无。结论:肺超声引导下PEEP试验与接受CPAP治疗的新冠肺炎患者的低死亡率相关。确定最佳PEEP有助于增加氧合并降低并发症的发生率。
Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP titration in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP.
Objectives: An increasing number of COVID-19 patients were treated with continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP). To evaluate the clinical effects of personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to standard fixed PEEP in COVID-19 patients requiring CPAP.
Methods: This is a single center, prospective, randomized clinical study. Sixty-three COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pneumonia were randomized in two Groups: Group A received CPAP with fixed PEEP of 10 cm H2O, Group B performed the "PEEP trial", that consists in the evaluation of best PEEP defined as the PEEP value that precedes the echographic appearance of "lung pulse" determining a PaO2/FiO2 increase. Primary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality + intubation, secondary outcome was the percentage increase of PaO2/FiO2. As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected.
Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in Group A and 31 in Group B. The two groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome occurred in 36 (57.1 %) patients: 23 (71.8 %) in Group A and 13 (41.9 %) in Group B (p<0.01). Mortality was higher in Group A (53.1 vs. 19.3 %, p<0.01), while intubation rate was comparable between groups. Group B showed a higher PaO2/FiO2 increase than Group A (34.9 vs. 13.1 %, p<0.01). Five cases of pneumothorax were reported in Group A, none in Group B.
Conclusions: Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP trial is associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP. Identifying the best PEEP is useful to increase oxygenation and reduce the incidence of complications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.